Contributions of international Political Economy to the theoretical comprehension of the relation between the IMF and developing countries

Authors

  • Pablo Nemiña Universidad Nacional de San Martín

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2017.1.24570

Keywords:

IMF. Developing countries. Negotiations. Interests. Rational action.

Abstract

While there is consensus that the IMF succeeded in extending globalization and the domination of finance to developing countries, the relationship between the IMF and developing countries is not a link in which invariably the former imposes and the latter complies, nor one in which the organism necessarily disagrees with countries’ non-fulfilments. Understanding the historical sense of the relationship and the changing balance of power between actors requires analysing the negotiations through which conflicts between these actors emerge and are resolved. The aim of this paper is to present a contribution on the theoretical status of the relationship between the IMF and the developing countries, considering their role as main borrowers, based on the contributions of the International Political Economy (IPE) concerning the importance of interests as well as those of Sociology concerning the criticism of rational action. We propose a famework of analysis that considers the relationship between the IMF and a developing country as a complex and dynamic link whose result is not determined in advance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BABB, Sarah; BUIRA, Ariel. Mission creep, mission push and discretion: the case of IMF conditionality. In: Ariel En Buira (org.). The IMF and the World Bank at sixty. London: Anthem Press, 2005. p. 59-83.

BABB, Sarah. The IMF on sociological perspective: a tale of organizational slippage. Studies in comparative International Development, v. 38, n. 2, p. 3-27, 2003 <10.1007/BF02686266>.

BARNETT, Michael; FINNEMORE, Martha. The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization, v. 53, n. 4, p. 699-732, 1999 <10.1162/002081899551048>.

BARRO, Robert; LEE, Jong-Wha. IMF programs: who is chosen and what are the effects. NBER Working paper series, n. 8951, 2002.

BECKERT, Jens. Economic sociology and embeddedness: how shall we conceptualize economic action? Journal of Economic Issues, v. 37, n. 3, p. 769-787, 2003 <10.1080/00213624.2003.11506613>.

BHAGWATI, Jagdish. The capital myth: the difference between trade in widgets and dollars. Foreign Affairs, v. 77, n. 3, p. 7-12, 1998.

BIRD, Graham; ROWLANDS, Dane. Political economy influences within the lifecycle of IMF programmes. The World Economy, v. 26, n. 9, p. 1255-1278, 2003 <10.1046/j.1467-9701.2003.00572.x>.

BRENTA, Noemí. Argentina atrapada: historia de las relaciones con el FMI 1956- 2006. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Cooperativas, 2008.

BRETHERTON, Charlotte; VOGLER, John. The European Union as a global actor. 2. ed. New York: Routledge, 2006.

CHESNAIS, François. Introducción general. In: François Chesnais (coord.). La mundialización financiera. Génesis, costo y desafíos. Buenos Aires: Losada, 2001. p. 19-43.

COPELOVITCH, Mark. Master or servant? Agency slack and the politics of IMF lending. La Follette School working paper, n. 2007-039, 2007.

DREHER, Axel; JENSEN, Nathan. Independent actor or agent? An empirical analysis of the impact of U.S. interests on IMF conditions. KOF working papers, n. 118, 2005.

DREHER, Axel. IMF conditionality: theory and evidence. Public Choice, v. 141, n. 1, p. 233-267, 2009 <10.1007/s11127-009-9486-z>.

EMIRBAYER, Mustafa. Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, v. 103, n. 2, p. 281-317, 1997 <10.1086/231209>.

FOUCAULT, Michel. Vigilar y castigar: nacimiento de la prisión. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, 1976.

FRENKEL, Roberto; O’DONNELL, Guillermo. Los programas de estabilización convenidos con el FMI y sus impactos internos. Estudios Cedes, n. 1, 1978.

GIDDENS, Anthony. La constitución de la sociedad: bases para la teoría de la estructuración. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1998.

GINER, Salvador; LAMO de Espinosa, E.; TORRES, C. (orgs.). Diccionario de Sociología. 2. ed. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 2006.

GOULD, Erica. Money talks: the international monetary fund, conditionality, and supplementary financiers. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.

GRANOVETTER, Mark. Acción económica y estructura social: el problema de la incrustación. In: F. Requena Santos (comp.). Análisis de redes sociales: orígenes, teorías y aplicaciones. Madrid: Alianza, [1985] 2003. p. 231-269.

GUTNER, Tamar. Minding the gap: understanding IO performance. Paper presented to the ISA Conference, Chicago IL, february 28-march 3, 2007

HAQUE, Nadeem; KHAN, Mohsin. Do IMF-supported programswork? A survey of the cross-country empirical evidence. IMF working paper, n. 169, 1998.

HELLEINER, Eric. Explaining the globalization of financial markets: bringing states back in. Review of International Political Economy, v. 2, n. 2, p. 315-341, 1995 <10.1080/09692299508434322>.

JENSEN, Nathan. Crisis, conditions, and capital: the effect of international monetary fund agreements on foreign direct investment inflows. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, v. 48, n. 2, p. 194-210, 2004.

KAHLER, Miles. Bargaining with the IMF. Two-level strategies and developing countries. In: P. Evans; H. Jacobson; R. Putnam (orgs.). Double-edged diplomacy: international bargaining and domestic politics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993. p. 363-394.

KAHLER, Miles. The United States and the International Monetary Fund: declining influence or declining interest? In: M. Karns; K. Mingst (orgs.). The United States and multilateral institutions: patterns of changing instrumentality and influence. London and New York: Routledge, 1992. p. 62-77.

KRIPPNER, Greta. The financialization of the American economy. Socio-economic Review, v. 3, n. 2, p. 173-208, 2005 <10.1093/SER/mwi008>.

LAFFONT, Jean-Jacques; MARTIMORT, David. The theory of incentives: the principal-agent model. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002.

LEITERITZ, Ralf. Explaining organizational outcomes: the International Monetary Fund and capital account liberalization. Journal of International Relations and Development. v. 8, n. 1, p. 1-26, 2005 <10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800044>.

MARTIN, Lisa. Distribution, information, and delegation to international organizations: the case of IMF conditionality. In: Darren Hawkins, David A. Lake, Daniel L. Nielson, Michael J. Tierney (orgs.). Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. p. 140-164.

MOMANI, Bessma. American politicization of the International Monetary Fund. Review of International Political Economy, v. 11, n. 5, p. 880-904, 2004 <10.1080/0969229042000313064>.

NEMIÑA, Pablo. ¿Cómo se toman decisiones en el FMI? La incidencia de los países centrales en el otorgamiento del “blindaje” a la Argentina en 2001. Revista Electrónica de Fuentes y Archivos, n. 4, p. 306-321, 2013.

NEMIÑA, Pablo. La relación entre el FMI y los gobiernos tomadores de créditos: los procesos de negociación con la Argentina durante el estallido y la salida de la crisis de la convertibilidad (1998-2006). Buenos Aires, 2011. Tesis de doctorado, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Buenos Aires.

NOORUDDIN, Irfan; WOO, Byungwon. Heeding the sirens: why some states enter IMF programs sooner than others? Paper presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, New York February 15, 2009.

SINCLAIR, Timothy. Let’s get it right this time! Why regulation will not solve or prevent global financial crises. International Political Sociology, v. 3, n. 4, p. 450-453, 2009 <10.1111/j.1749-5687.2009.00086_2.x>.

STALLINGS, Bárbara. La economía política de las negociaciones de la deuda: América Latina en la década de los ochenta. In: J. Ocampo et al. La crisis latinoamericana de la deuda desde la perspectiva histórica. Santiago: Cepal, 2015. p. 53-82.

STIGLITZ, Joseph. El malestar en la globalización. Argentina: Editorial Taurus, 2002.

STRANGE, Susan. IMF: Monetary Managers. In: R. Cox; H. Jacobson. The anatomy of influence: decision making in international organization. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974. p. 263-297.

THACKER, Strom. The high politics of IMF lending. World Politics, n. 52, n. 1, p. 38-75, 1999 <10.1017/S0043887100020025>.

VAUBEL, Roland. Bureaucracy at the IMF and the World Bank: a comparison of the evidence. The World Economy, v. 19, n. 2, p. 195-210, 1996 <10.1111/j.1467-9701.1996.tb00672.x>.

VAUBEL, Roland. The political economy of the International Monetary Fund: a public choice analysis. In: R. Vaubel; T. Willett (orgs.). The political economy of international organizations: a public choice approach. Boulder: Westview Press, 1991. p. 204-244.

VREELAND, James R. The effect of IMF programs on labor. World Development, v. 30, n. 1, p. 121-139, 2002.

VREELAND, James R. The IMF and economic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

WENDT, Alexander. Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, v. 46, n. 2, p. 391-425, 1992 <10.1017/S0020818300027764>.

WOODS, Ngaire. The globalizers. The IMF, the World Bank and their borrowers. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006.

WOODS, Ngaire. The United States and the international financial institutions: power and influence within the World Bank and the IMF. In: R. Foot; N. Macfarlane; M. Mastanduno (orgs.). US hegemony and international organizations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003. p. 92-114.

Published

2017-05-09

How to Cite

Nemiña, P. (2017). Contributions of international Political Economy to the theoretical comprehension of the relation between the IMF and developing countries. Civitas: Journal of Social Sciences, 17(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2017.1.24570

Issue

Section

Finances and society