Além da distribuição: A teoria ética da justiça de Honneth

Louis Carré

doi:10.15448/1984-7289.2015.4.22524

Autores

Louis Carré l’Université Libre de Bruxelles

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2015.4.22524

Palavras-chave:

Axel Honneth. Teoria da justiça. Distribuição. Reconhecimento. Liberdade. Democracia. Rawls.

Resumo

Neste artigo, o autor considera a crítica que Axel Honneth formulou contra o modelo de justiça distributiva do qual Rawls é hoje um dos mais importantes representantes teóricos. Depois de ter delineado os três principais limites do “paradigma distributivo” (em termos de procedimentalismo, atomismo e estado-centrismo), o texto discute então o contra-modelo de teoria da justiça de Honneth. A teoria “ética” da justiça de Honneth consiste num “reconhecimento normativo” das “instituições de reconhecimento”, que permitem aos indivíduos experimentarem certas formas de “liberdade social” baseada no reconhecimento recíproco. Como conclusão, o autor trata de algumas das dificuldades associadas com a teoria “ética” da justiça de Honneth.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Cohen, G. (2008), Rescuing Justice and Equality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Fraser, N., Honneth, A. (2003), Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, Verson, London and New-York.

Habermas, J. (1998), Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, MIT Press, Boston.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1991), Elements of the Philosophy of Right, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Honneth, A. (2012), “The Fabric of Justice. On the Limits of Contemporary Proceduralism”, in The I in the We. Studies on the Theory of Recognition, Polity Press, Cambridge, p. 35-55.

Honneth, A. (2014), Freedom’s Right. The Social Foundations of Democratic Life, Columbia University Press, New-York.

Jütten, T. (2015), “Is the Market a Sphere of Social Freedom?”, Critical Horizons, vol. 16, n°2, p. 187-203.

Macpherson, C.B. (1973), Democratic Theory. Essays in retrieval, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Miller, D. (2001), Principles of Social Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Neuhouser, F. (2000), Foundations of Hegel’s social theory: actualizing freedom, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Pateman, C. (1988), The Sexual Contract, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Polanyi, K. (1957), “The economy as instituted process”, in Polanyi, K., Arensberg, C. M., Trade and Market in the Early Empires, Chicago, p. 243-270.

Rawls, J. (1999), A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Sandel, M. (1982), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Taylor, C. (1985a), “Atomism’, in Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Philosophical Papers 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 187-210.

Taylor, C. (1985b), “The nature and scope of distributive justice”, in Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Philosophical Papers 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 289-317.

Okin, S. M. (1989), Justice, Gender and the Family, Basic Books, New-York.

Walzer, M. (1983), Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, Basic Books, New-York.

Young, I.M. (1990), Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Young, I.M. (2007), “Recognition of Love’s Labor. Reconsidering Axel Honneth’s Feminism”, in van den Brink, B., Owen, D. (ed.), Recognition and Power. Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 189-213.