Work engagement, mental health and personality in justice officers

Authors

  • Natália dos Santos Dalanhol Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre
  • Clarissa Pinto Pizarro de Freitas Universidade Salgado de Oliveira
  • Wagner de Lara Machado Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas
  • Claudio Simon Hutz Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Ana Claudia Souza Vazquez Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2017.2.25885

Keywords:

worker’s health, psychosocial factors, personality, well-being, positive psychology

Abstract

Work engagement is defined as a positive experience related to well-being and job performance. The aim of this study was to investigate its associations with mental health and personality in judiciary workers. The sample consisted of 82 justice officers (57.3% female) with mean age of 47.4 years (SD = 9.8 years), who answered a socio-demographic survey and validated instruments of the constructs studied. Descriptive analysis, correlations analysis, hierarchical regression (stepwise method) and network analysis were performed. The results showed that the justice officers have mental health problems and that vital energy was the main predictor of engagement. Also, engagement associates negatively with minor psychiatric disorders and, indirectly, with neuroticism. These findings indicate the importance of promoting mental health and engagement of these workers through interventions at the organizational level, because these factors are influenced by environment and labor organization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D., & Borsboom, D. (2012). Qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i04

Foygel, R. and Drton, M. (2010). Extended Bayesian information criteria for Gaussian graphical models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 23, 2020-2028.

Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2008). Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics, 9(3), 432-441. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045

Fruchterman, T. M. J. & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software – Practice and Experience, 12, 1129-1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380211102

Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical models. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press,

Hakanen, J. J. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 141, 415-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.043

Hu, Q., Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T. W. (2011). The Job Demands–Resources model: An analysis of additive and joint effects of demands and resources. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.12.009

Hutz, C. S. & Nunes, C. H. S. S. (2001). Escala Fatorial de Ajustamento Emocional/Neuroticismo. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000200009

Innstrand, S. T., Langballe, E. M., & Falkum, E. (2012). A Longitudinal Study of the Relationship between Work Engagement and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression. Stress and Health, 28, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1395

Lin, W., Wang, L., Bamberger, P. A., Zhang, Q., Wang, H., Guo, W., & Zhang, T. (2016). Leading future orientations for current effectiveness: The role of engagement and supervisor coaching in linking future work self salience to job performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 145-156.

Machado, W. L., Vissoci, J., & Epskamp, S. (2015). Análise de rede aplicada à Psicometria e à Avaliação Psicológica. In C. S. Hutz, D. R. Bandeira, & C. M. Trentini (Orgs.). Psicometria (pp. 125-146). Porto Alegre: ArtMed.

Maas, H. & Spinath, F. M. (2012). Personality and Coping with Professional Demands: A Behavioral Genetics Analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(3), 376-385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027641

Merlo, A. R. C., Dornelles, R. A. N., Bottega, C. G., & Trentini, L. (2012). O trabalho e a saúde dos oficiais de Justiça Federal de Porto Alegre. Cadernos de Psicologia Social do Trabalho, 15(1), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-0490.v15i1p101-113

Miles, J. & Shevlin, M. (2001). Applying Regression and Correlation: A Guide for Students and Researchers, Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Ministério da Previdência Social. (2015). Acompanhamento mensal dos benefícios auxílios-doença previdenciários concedidos segundo os códigos da CID-10. Recuperado de: http://www.mtps.gov.br/arquivos/office/4_100111-115547-873.pdf

Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 23, 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006

Paulhus, D. L., Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Tracy, J. L. (2004). Two replicable suppressor situations in personality research. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 303-328. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_7

Pereira, P. V. A. & Assunção, A. A. (2007). Trabalho e emoção: o caso dos oficiais de justiça. Pesquisas e Práticas Psicossociais, 2(1). Recuperado de: http://www.ufsj.edu.br/portal2-epositorio/File/revistalapip/11artigo.pdf

Pizzinato, A., Carlotto, M. S., Cé, J. P., & Conceição, I. K. (2014). Significados do trabalho e qualidade de vida percebida em trabalhadores do judiciário. Revista Interinstitucional de Psicologia, 7 (2), 188-198. Recuperado de: http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/pdf/gerais/v7n2/v7n2a07.pdf

Santos, K. O. B., Araújo, T. M., & Oliveira, N. F. (2009). Estrutura fatorial e consistência interna do Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) em população urbana. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 25(1), 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009000100023

Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). What is engagement? In C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, A. Shantz, & E. Soane (Eds.). Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Schaufeli, W. B., Dijkstra, P., & Vazquez, A. C. (2013). Engajamento no trabalho. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.

Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T.W. (2014). A critical review of the Job Demands-Resources Model: Implications for improving work and health. In G. F. Bauer & O. Hämmig (Eds.). Bridging occupational, organizational and public health (pp. 43-68). Amsterdam: Springer.

Sulea, C., Van Beek, I., Sarbescua, P., Virga, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Engagement, boredom, and burnout among students: Basic need satisfaction matters more than personality traits. Learning and Individual Differences, 42,132-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.018

Tavares, D. S. (2003). Sofrimento psíquico entre servidores públicos: uma análise psicossocial do contexto do trabalho em um Tribunal Judiciário Federal. Dissertação de mestrado não-publicada, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.

Vazquez, A. C. S., Magnan, E. S., Pacico, J. C., Hutz, C. S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Adaptation and Validation of the Brazilian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Psico-USF, 20(2), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712015200202

Zis, P., Anagnostopoulos, F., & Artemiadis, A. K. (2016). Residency Training: Work engagement during neurology training. Neurology, 87(5), e45-e48. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002911

Published

2017-06-22

How to Cite

Dalanhol, N. dos S., Freitas, C. P. P. de, Machado, W. de L., Hutz, C. S., & Vazquez, A. C. S. (2017). Work engagement, mental health and personality in justice officers. Psico, 48(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2017.2.25885

Issue

Section

Articles