Nós temos livre-arbítrio?





Livre-Arbítrio, Liberdade


Adotei uma abordagem experimental para essa questão. Atos de vontade livre são precedidos por uma mudança elétrica específica no cérebro (readiness potential, RP)3, que inicia 550 milissegundos antes do ato. As pessoas tomaram consciência da intenção de agir 350-400 milissegundos depois do início do RP e 200 milissegundos antes do ato motor. O processo volitivo é, portanto, iniciado inconscientemente. Mas a função consciente ainda poderia controlar o resultado; pode vetar o ato. O livre-arbítrio não é, portanto, excluído. Essas descobertas impõem restrições às visões de como o livre-arbítrio pode operar; não faria iniciar um ato voluntário, mas poderia controlar a realização. As descobertas também afetam perspectivas de culpa e responsabilidade.


Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Ângelo Roberto Ilha da Silva, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Pós-doutor em neurociências pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Doutor em Direito pela Universidade de São Paulo.

Daison Nelson Ferreira Dias, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Mestre em neurociências pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul. Mestrando em Direito pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.


DOTY, R. W. The five mysteries of the mind, and their consequences. In: PUENTE, Antonio. (Ed). Views of the Brain-A Tribute to Roger W. Sperry. Washington, DC: American Psych. Assoc., 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00060-8

KORNHUBER, H.; DEECKE, L. Hirnpotentialänderungen bei Wilikürbewegungen und passiven Bewegungen des Menschen: Bereitschaftspotential und reafferente Potentiale. Pflüegers Archiv Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere, v. 284, p. 1-17, 1965. Disponível em: http://luederdeecke.at/images/KornhuberDeeckeClassicPaper_1965.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00412364

LIBET, B. Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavior and Brain Sciences, v. 8, n. 4, p. 529-566, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044903 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044903

LIBET, B. Conscious subjective experience vs. unconscious mental functions: A theory of the cerebral processes involved. In: COTTERILL, R. M. J. Models of Brain Function. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

LIBET, B. The neural time factor in conscious and unconscious mental events. In: LIBET, B. Ciba Foundation Symposium #174, Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Consciousness. Chichester: Wiley, 1993. Disponível em: http://www.newdualism.org/papers/B.Libet/Libet-JCS1994.pdf

LIBET, B. A testable field theory of mind-brain interaction. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 1, n. 1, p. 119-126, 1994. Disponível em: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-00853-003

LIBET, B. Neural time factors in Conscious and Unconscious Mental Function. In: HAMEROFF, S. R.; KASZNIAK, A. W.; SCOTT, A. C. (Eds). Toward a Science of Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.

LIBET, Benjamin et al. Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness potential): the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, v. 106, p. 623-642, 1983a. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/106.3.623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/106.3.623

LIBET, B.; WRIGHT, E. W. J.; GLEASON, C. A. Preparation - or intention-to-act, in relation to pre-event potentials recorded at the vertex. Electroenceph. and Clinical Neurophysiology, v. 56, n. 4, p. 367-372, 1983b. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(83)90262-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(83)90262-6

LIBET, B.; WRIGHT, E. W. J.; GLEASON, C. A. Readiness potentials preceding unrestricted spontaneous pre-planned voluntary acts. Electroencephalograph and Clinical Neurophysiology, v. 54, n. 3, p. 322-325, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(82)90181-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(82)90181-X

LIBET, B. et al. Control of the transition from sensory detection to sensory awareness in man by the duration of a thalamic stimulus. The cerebral time-on factor. Brain, v. 114, p. 1731-1757, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/114.4.1731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/114.4.1731

LIBET, B. et al. Subjective referral of the timing for a conscious sensory experience: A functional role for the somatosensory specific projection system in man. Brain, v. 102, n. 1, p. 191-222, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/102.1.193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/102.1.193

SINGER, I. B. Interview by H. Flender, in (1981). In: PLIMPTON, George. (Ed.). The PARIS REVIEW Interviews: Writers at Work. New York: Penguin Books, 1968.

SPENCE, S. A.; FRITH, C. D. Towards a functional anatomy of volition. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 6, n. 8-9, p. 11-29, 1999. Disponível em: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/imp/jcs/1999/00000006/F0020008/964

VELMANS, M. Is human information processing conscious? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, v. 14, n. 4, p. 651-669, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00071776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00071776

ARMSTRONG, D. M. The Nature of Mind. Sussex: the Harvester Press, 1981.

ARMSTRONG, D. M. What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139171700

Blechner, M. J. The Mindbrain and Dreams: An Exploration of Dreaming, Thinking, and Artistic Creation. New York: Routledge, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351185677

BOITEUX, E. A. P. C.. Imperativo. Enciclopédia jurídica da PUC-SP. In: GONZAGA, C. F. C. A. A.; FREIRE, A. L. (Coords.). Teoria Geral e Filosofia do Direito. São Paulo: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2017. Disponível em: https://enciclopediajuridica.pucsp.br/verbete/156/edicao-1/imperativo

Boucher d’Argis, A. G. Law of nature, or Natural law. In: _____. The Encyclopedia of Diderot & d’Alembert Collaborative Translation Project. Tradução de Susan Rosa. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library, 2002. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.did2222.0000.021

Burnes, B.; COOKE, B. Kurt Lewin’s Field Theory: A Review and Re-evaluation. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 15, n. 4, p. 408-425, London: Wiley-Blackwell for British Academy of Management, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00348.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00348.x

Danziger, K. Making Social Psychology Experimental: A Conceptual History, 1920-1970. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, v. 36, n. 4, p. 329-347, New York: Wiley, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(200023)36:4%3C329::AID-JHBS3%3E3.0.CO;2-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(200023)36:4<329::AID-JHBS3>3.0.CO;2-5

ERWIN, E. Behavior Therapy: Scientific, Philosophical, and Moral Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

Feigenbaum, M. J. The Universal Metric Properties of Nonlinear Transformations. Journal of Statistical Physics, v. 21. 1979, p. 669-706, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01107909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01107909

Feigenbaum, M. J. Universality in complex discrete dynamics. In: ______. Los Alamos Theoretical Division Annual Report. Washington: National Nuclear Security Administration, 1976, p. 1975-1976.

Heisenberg, W. K.. Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, v. 43, n. 3-4, p. 172-198, Berlin: Springer, 1927. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397280

HUXLAY, T. H. On the hypothesis that animals are automata, and its history. Fortnightly Review, v. 95, p. 555-580, London: Chapman and Hall, 1874. Disponível em: https://philpapers.org/rec/HUXOTH

JAMES, W. The Principles of Psychology. Vol. I. New York: Henry Holt and Co, 1890, p. 128-144.

Kornhuber, H. H.; Deecke, L. Changes in brain potential in humans before and after voluntary movements studied by recording on magnetic tape and reverse analysis. Pflüger’s Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere: European Journal of Physiology, v. 281, n. 52, 1964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-016-1852-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-016-1852-3

Lewin, K. Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology. American Journal of Sociology, v. 44, n. 6, p. 868-896, Chicago: American Journal of Sociology, 1939. Disponível em: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/218177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/218177

Libet, B. A testable field theory of mind-brain interaction. Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 1, n. 1, p. 119-126, Exeter: Imprint Academic, 1994. Disponível em: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-00853-003

Libet, B. Do We Have a Free Will? Journal of Consciousness Studies, v. 6, n. 8-9, p. 47-57, Exeter: Imprint Academic, 1999. Disponível em: https://philpapers.org/rec/LIBDWH

LOGAN, G. D.; COWAN, W. B. On the Ability to Inhibit Thought and Action: A Theory Of An Act of Control. Psychological Review, v. 91, n. 3, p. 295, Washington: American Psychological Association, 1984. https://doi/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.295

MILLIKAN, R. A. The Autobiography of Robert A. Millikan. New York: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195011000-00009

MILLIKAN, R. A. The Isolation of an Ion, a Precision Measurement of Its Charge, and the Correction of Stokes Law. Science, v. 32, p. 436-448, Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1910. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.32.822.436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.32.822.436

Oestreicher, C. A History of Chaos Theory. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, v. 9, n. 3, p. 279-289, Neuilly-sur-Seine: Les Laboratoires Servier, 2007. https://doi.org/10.31887%2FDCNS.2007.9.3%2Fcoestreicher DOI: https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2007.9.3/coestreicher

PATY, M. A Noção de Determinismo na Física e Seus Limites. Scientiae Studia, v. 2, n. 4, p. 465-492, São Paulo: USP, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662004000400002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662004000400002

REALE JÚNIOR, M. Instituições de Direito Penal: Parte Geral. 4ª Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2013.

SILVA, A R. I. Curso de Direito Penal: Parte Geral. 2ª Ed. Belo Horizonte: D’Plácido, 2021.

SOUZA, D. G. Feuerbach e a Questão do Livre-Arbítrio: Acerca dos Pressupostos Filosóficos do Direito Penal. Revista de Estudos Criminais, v. 50, p. 45-60, Porto Alegre, 2013.

TOLEDO, F. A.. Princípios Básicos de Direito Penal. 5ª Ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1994.

WELZEL, H. Das Deutsche Strafrecht. 11ª Ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110897302




Como Citar

da Silva, Ângelo R. I., & Dias, D. N. F. (2021). Nós temos livre-arbítrio?. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 66(1), e38524. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2021.1.38524