Perceptions of nursing students on the structural dimensions of clinical simulation
AIMS: To identify the perception of nursing students about the structural dimensions of the design of high-fidelity simulation scenarios in adult immunization scenarios in the context of primary health care.
METHODS: Descriptive, exploratory, quantitative study developed at a Brazilian federal public university from May to June 2017. The final sample consisted of 17 students. The 5-item Likert simulation design Scale was used to evaluate the design of simulation scenarios.
RESULTS: The majority of students are young and female adults (82.4%). In the internal consistency analysis, the simulation design scale presented a total Cronbach's alpha of 0.930. In all dimensions of the scale, overall averages were equal to or greater than 4.60. The dimensions that showed the greatest agreement and importance among students were, respectively, problem solving and realism.
CONCLUSIONS: In the students' perception, the simulated scenarios were clear and objective in relation to the proposal and the execution. In addition, they felt supported during the learning process, which allowed to explore and solve the problems presented during the simulation. The feedback provided was relevant and provided opportunities for students to reflect on their practices and attitudes. Finally, realism was highlighted as an important aspect by those surveyed.
National League for Nursing. Simulation Innovation Resource Center, 2013.
Available from: http://sirc.nln.org/mod/glossary/view.php?id=183
Foronda C, Liu S, Bauman EB. Evaluation of simulation in undergraduate nurse education: An integrative review. Clin Simul Nurs. 2013 [cited 2018 April 11]; 9(10):409-16.
Adamson KA, Kardong-Edgren S, Willhaus J. An updated review of published simulation evaluation instruments. Clin Simul Nurs. 2013 [cited 2018 April 11];9(9):393-400.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2012.09.004
Doolen J, Mariani B, Atz T, et al. High-Fidelity Simulation in Undergraduate Nursing Education: A Review of Simulation Reviews. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016 [cited 2018 April 11]; 12(7):290-302.
Durham CF, Cato ML, Lasater K. NLN/Jeffries Simulation Framework state of the science project: Participant construct. Clin Simul Nurs. 2014 [cited 2018 April 11]; 10(7):363-72.
Husson NM, Zulkosky K, Fetter M, Kamerer J. Integrating community health simulation scenarios: Experiences from the NCSBN National simulation study. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2014 [cited 2018 April 11]; 10:581-6.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.11.009
Herron EK, Nemeth J, Powers KA. Community Health Simulation with a Standardized Patient: Exploring the Experience. Clin Simul Nurs. 2017 [cited 2018 April 11]; 13(7): 331-7.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.05.011
Arthur C, Levett-Jones T, Kable A. Quality indicators for the design and implementation of simulation experiences: A Delphi study. Nurse Education Today. 2013 [cited 2018 April 11]; 33:1357-61.
Almeida RGS, Mazzo A, Martins JCA. Validation to Portuguese of the Scale of Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 [cited 2018 April 11]; 23(6):1007-13.
Franklin AE, Burns P, Lee CS. Psychometric testing on the NLN Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning, Simulation Design Scale, and Educational Practices Questionnaire using a sample of pre-licensure novice nurses. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 [cited 2018 April 11]; 34(10):1298-304.
Cantrell MA, Meakim C, Cash K. Development and Evaluation of Three Pediatric-based Clinical Simulation. Clin Simul Nurs. 2008 [cited 2018 April 11]; 4(1):21-8.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.05.052
Committee IS. INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM Simulation Design. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016 [cited 2018 April 11]; 12:13-5.
Bloom BS. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman; 1956.
Mcdermott DS. The prebriefing concept: a Delphi study of CHSE experts. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2016 [cited 2018 April 11]; 12(6):219-27.
Park SN, Chu MS, Hwang YY, et al. Effects of integrated nursing practice simulation-based training on stress, interest in learning, and problem-solving ability of nursing students. Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing. 2015 [cited 2018 April 11]; 22(4):424-32.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2015.22.4.424
Kim YJ, Noh GO, Im YS. Effect of Step-Based Prebriefing Activities on Flow and Clinical Competency of Nursing Students in Simulation-Based Education. Clin Simul Nurs. 2017 [cited 2018 April 12]; 13(11):544-51.
Babenko-Mould Y, Andrusyszyn A, Goldenberg D. Effects of computer-based clinical conferencing on nursing students’ self-efficacy. Journal of Nursing Education. 2004 [cited 2018 April 12]; 43(4):149-155.
Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 1994.
Copyright (c) 2019 Scientia Medica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to Scientia Medica implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Scientia Medica as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.