Syntax-Semantics interface: making the case for a construction grammar approach to Brazilian Portuguese VS order

Authors

  • Diogo Pinheiro Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
  • Lilian Ferrari Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2015.2.20403

Keywords:

VS order, Construction Grammar, Cognitive Semantics, Semantic frame.

Abstract

This papers aims at developing a construction grammar approach to subject inversion in Brazilian Portuguese. After arguing that the verb-subject structure is best understood as a grammatical construction (thus a symbolic unit), we go on to analyze the semantic dimension of the VS construction in two separate levels: Verhagen’s (2005) object-level (the construction’s predication) and subject-level (the construal imposed on the predication). It is also argued that the correlations often found between subject inversion, on the one hand, and unnacusativity or lack of agentivity, on the other, can be regarded as by-products of the general proposal advanced here.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AMBRIDGE, Ben; LIEVEN, Elena. A constructivist account of child language acquisition. In: MACWHINNEY, B.; O’GRADDY, W. (Eds.). The handbook of language emergence. Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118346136.ch22

AMBRIDGE, Ben; GOLDBERG, Adele. The island status of clausal complements: evidence in favor of an information structure explanation. Cognitive Linguistics, v. 3, n. 19, p. 357-389, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2008.014

BERLINCK, Rosane de Andrade. A construção V SN no Português do Brasil: uma visão diacrônica do fenômeno da ordem. In: TARALLO, Fernando (org.). Fotografias sociolinguísticas. Campinas: Pontes, 1989. p. 95-112.

COELHO, Izete Lehmkuhl. A ordem V DP em construções monoargumentais: uma restrição sintático-semântica. 2000. 245 fls. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2006.

CROFT, William. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001.

DANCYGIER, Barbara. Conclusion: multiple viewpoints, multiple spaces. In: DANCYGIER, Barbara; SWEETSER, Eve (eds.) Viewpoint in language: a multimodal perspective. Cambridge: University Press, 2012.

DUARTE, Inês. A família de construções inacusativas. In: MATEUS, Maria Helena Mira et al. Gramática da Língua Portuguesa. Lisboa: Caminho, 2003. p. 507-548.

FERRARI, Lilian. Distribution and function of word order variation in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Pragmatics, v. 1, n. 4, p. 649-666, 1990.

______; SWEETSER, Eve. Subjectivity and upwards projection in mental space structure. In: DANCYGIER, Barbara; SWEETSER, Eve (eds.) Viewpoint in language: a multimodal perspective. Cambridge: University Press, 2012.

FIGUEIREDO SILVA, Maria Cristina. A posição sujeito no português brasileiro: frases finitas e infinitivas. Campinas: Unicamp, 1996.

FILLMORE, Charles. The case for case. In: BACH, Emon.; HARMS, Robert. (eds.) Universals in Linguistic Theory. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968. p. 1-88 .

______. The case for case reopened. In: COLE, Peter; SADOCK, Jerrold. (eds.). Syntax and Semantics: grammatical relations. New York / San Francisco / London: Academic Press, 1977. p. 59-81.

______. Frame semantics. In: THE LINGUISTIC SOCIETY OF KOREA (ed.). Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co., 1982. p. 111-137.

GOLDBERG, Adele. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University Press, 1995.

______. Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, v. 7, n. 5, p. 219-224, 2003.

______. Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Cambridge: University Press, 2006.

______. Constructionist approaches. In. HOFFMANN, Thomas; TROUSDALE, Graeme (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: University Press, 2013. p. 15-31.

JACKENDOFF, Ray. Semantic structures. Cambridge / London: The MIT Press, 1990.

LAKOFF, George; JOHNSON, Mark. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University Press, 1980.

LAMBRECHT, Knud. Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: University Press, 1994.

______. When subjects behave like objects: an analysis of the merging of S and O in sentences-focus constructions across languages. Studies in language, v. 24, n. 3, p. 611-682, 2000.

LANGACKER, Ronald. Foundations of cognitive grammar: theoretical prerequi¬sites. Vol 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987

______. Foundations of cognitive grammar: descriptive application. Vol 2. Stanford: University Press, 1991.

______. Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford: University Press, 2008.

NARO, Anthony Julius.; VOTRE, Sebastião Josué. Discourse motivations for linguistic regularities: verb/subject order in spoken Brazilian Portuguese. Probus, Dordrecht, v. 11, n. 1, p. 73-98, 1999.

NASCIMENTO, Milton do. Sur La postposition du sujet dans le portugais du Brèsil. Tese de doutorado de 3º ciclo, Université Paris VIII, 1984.

PEZATTI, Erotilde Goreti. A ordem de palavras em português: aspectos tipológicos e funcionais. 1992. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística e Língua Portuguesa) – Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, 1992.

PILATI, Eloisa. Sobre a ordem verbo sujeito no português do Brasil. 2002. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística) – Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2002.

PINHEIRO, Diogo. A ordem VS como construção gramatical. In: FERRARI, Lilian (org.). Espaços Mentais e construções gramaticais: do uso linguístico à tecnologia. Rio de Janeiro: Imprinta, 2009.

SAEED, John. Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.

VERHAGEN, A. Constructions of intersubjectivity: discourse, syntax and cognition. Oxford: University Press, 2007.

Published

2015-10-23

How to Cite

Pinheiro, D., & Ferrari, L. (2015). Syntax-Semantics interface: making the case for a construction grammar approach to Brazilian Portuguese VS order. Letrônica, 8(2), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2015.2.20403