Are there hidden caries or is this another limitation of the diagnostic conventional exams?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6523.2015.2.14592Keywords:
Computed microtomography, Dental diagnostics, Incipient lesions, Dental cariesAbstract
Objective: To verify the existence of hidden caries and compare the diagnosis agreement among different Examiners between the visual and radiographic exam and computed microtomography images of incipient dental lesions on the occlusal surface of extracted molars.
Methods: Two hundred and fifteen healthy teeth were extracted from the corpses of children with a mean age of 12 years and analysed by visual examination. However, only 11 teeth were included in current study because they showed suggestive caries image when examined by microtomography (micro CT scan). Occlusal sites were examined both visually and by dental radiograph by 3 different dental practitioners and results were compared and validated independently by each Examiner with computed microtomography, henceforth a gold-standard in current investigation. The coefficient of agreement was calculated by Cohen’s kappa test.
Results: the coefficient of agreement among Examiners for the diagnosis by standard microtomography was excellent (K = 0.924) and moderate for both the visual (K=0.515) and the radiographic (K=0.583) examinations. Computed microtomography-produced images allowed the Examiners to visualize radiolucent areas, unseen in previous radiographic images and visual exams, in which there existed communication between enamel and/or dentine and the external environment.
Conclusion: Hidden caries was the product of the conventional exam´s limitations, or rather, the lesion was due to enamel non-collapse. Consequently, conventional exams were not accurate enough to detect the lesions.
References
McDonald SP, Sheiham A. The distribution of caries on different tooth surfaces at varying levels of caries -– a compilation of data from 18 previous studies. Community Dent Health. 1992;9:39-48.
Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Estupiñán-Day S, Báez R. Analysis of prevalence and trends of dental caries in the Americas between the 1970s and 1990s. Int Dent J. 1999;49:322-9.
Whelton H. Overview of the impact of changing global patterns of dental caries experience on caries clinical trials. J Dent Res. 2004; 83 Spec No C:C29-34.
Bernabé E, Sheiham A, Sabbah W. Income, income inequality, dental caries and dental care levels: an ecological study in rich countries. Caries Res. 2009;43:294-301.
Bagramian RA, Garcia-Godoy F, Volpe AR. The global increase in dental caries. A pending public health crisis. Am J Dent 2009;22:3-8.
Weerheijm KL, Gruythuysen RJ, van Amerongen WE. Prevalence of hidden caries. ASDC J Dent Child. 1992;59:408-12.
Weerheijm KL. Occlusal ‘hidden caries’. Dent Update 1997;24:182-4.
Millman CK. Fluoride syndrome. Br Dent J. 1984;24;157:341.
Lewin DA. Fluoride Syndrome (latter). British Dental Journal 1985;158:39.
Creanor SL, Russell JI, Strang DM, Stephen KW, Burchell CK. The prevalence of clinically undetected occlusal dentine caries in Scottish adolescents. Br Dent J. 1990;169:126-9.
Ismail AI. Clinical diagnosis of precavitated carious lesions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997;25:13-23.
Ricketts D, Kidd E, Weerheijm K, de Soet H. Hidden caries: what is it? Does it exist? Does it matter? Int Dent J. 1997;47:259-65.
Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Kidd EA. Occlusal caries: pathology, diagnosis and logical management. Dent Update 2001;28:380-7.
Lynch RJ, Ten Cate JM. The effect of lesion characteristics at baseline on subsequent de- and remineralisation behaviour. Caries Res 2006;40: 530-5.
Praetzel JR et al. Cárie oculta em dentes decíduos: relato de caso clínico. Jornal Brasileiro de Odontopediatria e Clínica do Bebê 1999;2:432-7.
Souza-Zaroni WC, Ciccone JC, Souza-Gabriel AE, Ramos RP, Corona SA, Palma-Dibb RG. Validity and reproducibility of different combinations of methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vitro comparison. Caries Res.2006;40:194-201.
Ricketts DN, Ekstrand KR, Martignon S, Ellwood R, Alatsaris M, Nugent Z. Accuracy and reproducibility of conventional radiographic assessment and subtraction radiography in detecting demineralization in occlusal surfaces. Caries Res. 2007;41:121-8.
Neuhaus KW, Ellwood R, Lussi A, Pitts NB. Traditional lesion detection aids. Monogr Oral Sci. 2009;21:42-51.
Brooks SL. Computed tomography. Dental Clinics of North American 1993;37:575-590.
Parks ET. Computed tomography applications for dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2000;44:371-94.
Maltz M, Correa PZ, Veeck R. Comparison between clinical and radiographic examination of occlusal surface. In: 74th General Session of IADR, 1996, Washington. J Dent Res 1996;75:1106.
Bulman JS, Osborn JF. Measuring diagnostic consistency. Br Dent J. 1989;166:377- 81.
Landis JR, Koch GG. An Application of Hierarchical Kappa-type Statistics in the Assessment of Majority Agreement among Multiple Observers. Biometrics 1977;33:363-374.
Seow WK, Wan A, McAllan LH. The prevalence of pre-eruptive dentin radiolucencies in the permanent dentition. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21: 26-33.
Seow WK. Pre-eruptive intracoronal resorption as an entity of occult caries. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:370-6.
Chong MJ, Seow WK, Purdie DM, Cheng E, Wan V. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:441-9.
Poorterman JH, Weerheijm KL, Groen HJ, Kalsbeek H. Clinical and radiographic judgement of occlusal caries in adolescents. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108:93-8.
Thylstrup A, Fejerkov O. Radiologic diagnosis in caries management. Copenhagen: Munsgaard; 1994. p. 367-82.
Zafersoy-Akarslan Z, Erten H, Uzun O, Semiz M. Reproducibility and agreement of clinical diagnosis of occlusal caries using unaided visual examination and operating microscope. J Can Dent Assoc. 2009;75:455.
Thunthy KH. Technique for using films accidentally exposed to light. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988;65:371-5.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT
The submission of originals to Odonto Ciência implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Odonto Ciência as the site of original publication.
CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE
As this journal is open access, the articles are allowed free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source.
According to the type of Creative Commons License (CC-BY 4.0) adopted by Odonto Ciência, the user must respect the requirements below.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
However, only under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests Odonto Ciência endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
For more details on the Creative Commons license, please follow the link in the footer of this website.