Effect of erosion and methods for its control on the surface roughness of composite resin

Authors

  • Andrea Nóbrega Cavalcanti Dentistry Course, School of Medicine and Public Health of Bahia (BAHIANA) and School of Dentistry, Federal University of Bahia (FOUFBA)
  • Mariana Menezes Vaz de Queiroz Dentistry Course, School of Medicine and Public Health of Bahia (BAHIANA)
  • Patricia Akemi Nishitani Shibasaki Dentistry Course, School of Medicine and Public Health of Bahia (BAHIANA)
  • Max José Pimenta Lima Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA)
  • Richard Mark Foxton Kings College London Dental Institute, King’s College London.
  • Roberto Paulo Correia de Araújo Institute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6523.2017.2.27930

Keywords:

Tooth Wear, Fluorine Compounds, Permanent Dental Restoration

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin submitted to different degrees of erosion and methods of control.
Methods: 120 cylindrical composite specimens (6×1.5 mm) were randomly divided into four groups, according to the surface protection against the erosive challenge [negative control, topical application of fluoride, glass-ionomer sealant, resin sealant]. After the application of the respective method, specimens were divided into three subgroups (n=10): a) absence of erosive challenge; b) 9 cycles of DES-RE; c) 18 cycles of DES-RE. Surface roughness (Ra, μm) was recorded and statistically analyzed (2-way Anova/Tukey).
Results: The glass-ionomer sealant exhibited less rough surfaces under all the conditions. However, the average roughness was significantly higher after 18 DES-RE cycles.
Conclusion: Despite the potential shown by glass-ionomer sealant, it was concluded that no material prevented an increase in surface roughness of the nanofilled composite after an intense erosive challenge.

References

Munchow EA, Ferreira ACA, Machado RMM, Ramos TS, Rodrigues Junior SA, Zanchi CH. Effect of acidic solutions on the surface degradation of a micro-hybrid composite resin. Braz Dent J. 2014;25:321-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300058

Soares LES, De Carvalho Filho ACB. Protective effect of fluoride varnish and fluoride gel on enamel erosion: roughness, SEM-EDS, and u-EDXRF. Microsc Res Tech. 2015;78:240-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22467

Rajavardhan K, Sankar AJS, Kumar KR, Pranitha K, Kishore KK. Erosive potential of cola and orange juice on tooth colored restorative materials. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4:S208-12. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.141960

Fatima N, Abidi SYA, Qazi FUR, Jat SA. Effect of different tetra pack juices on microhardness of direct tooth colored-restorative materials. Saudi Dent J. 2013;25:29-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.09.002

Saunders JGC, McIntyre JM. The ability of 1.23% acidulated phosphate fluoride gel to inhibit simulated endogenous erosion in tooth roots. Aust Dent J. 2005;50:263-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2005.tb00371.x

Bartlett DW, Coward PY. Comparison of the erosive potential of gastric juice and a carbonated drink in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28:1045-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00780.x

Soares LE, De Oliveira R, Nahórny S, Espirito Santo AM, Martin AA. Micro energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence mapping of enamel and dental materials after chemical erosion. Microsc Microanal. 2012;18:1112-7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927612001535

Francisconi LF, Honório HM, Rios D, Magalhães AC, Machado MAAM, Buzalaf MAR. Effect of erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials and on enamel restored with these materials. Oper Dent. 2008;33:203-8. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-77

Honório HM, Rios D, Francisconi LF, Magalhães AC, Machado MA, Buzalaf MA. Effect of prolonged erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:947-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01856.x

Yeh ST, Wang HT, Liao HY, Su SL, Chang CC, Kao HC, et al. The roughness, microhardness, and surface analysis of nanocomposites after application of topical fluoride gels. Dent Mater. 2011;27:187-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.013

Wegehaupt FJ, Taubock TT, Sener B, Attin T. Long-term protective effect of surface sealants against erosive wear by intrinsic and extrinsic acids. J Dent. 2012;40:416-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.003

Zhou SL, Zhou J, Watanabe S, Watanabe K, Wen LY, Xuan K. In vitro study of the effects of fluoride-releasing dental materials on remineralization in an enamel erosion model. J Dent. 2012;40:255-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.016

Elkassas D, Arafa A. Remineralising efficacy of different calcium-phosphate and fluoride based delivery vehicles on artificial caries like enamel lesions. J Dent. 2014;42:466-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.017

Austin RS, Stenhagen KS, Hove LH, Dunne S, Moazzez R, Bartlett DW, et al. A qualitative and quantitative investigation into the effect of fluoride formulations on enamel erosion and erosion-abrasion in vitro. J Dent. 2011;39:648-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.006

Toda S, Featherstone JD. Effects of fluoride dentifrices on enamel lesion formation. J Dent Res. 2008;87:224-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700303

Wilder AD Jr, Swift JREJ, May JRKN, Thompson JY, McDougal RA. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resinmodified glass ionomer restorative materials. J Dent. 2000;28:367-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00075-5

Bollen CML, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997;13:258-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3

Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J. 2004;196:42-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4810881

Tantanuch S, Kukiattrakoon B, Peerasukprasert T, Chanmanee N, Chaisomboonphun P, Rodklai A. Surface roughness and erosion of nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites after immersion in red and white wine. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19:51-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.173199

Bagheri R, Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Subsurface degradation of resin-based composites. Dent Mater. 2007;23:944-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.035

Cilli R, Pereira JC, Prakki A. Properties of dental resins submitted to pH catalyzed hydrolysis. J Dent. 2012;40:1144-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.09.012

Abu-bakr N, Han L, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. Changes in the mechanical properties and surface texture of compomer immersed in various media. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:444-52. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109635

Bajwa NK, Pathak A. Change in surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials after exposure to different immersion regimes in a cola drink. ISRN Dent. 2014; [cited 2014 March 23]. Available at: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2014/353926/

Papagiannoulis L, Tzoutzas J, Eliades G. Effect of topical fluoride agents on the morphologic characteristics and composition of resin composite restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:405-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70166-5

el-Badrawy WAG, McComb D, Wood RE. Effect of home-use fluoride gels on glass ionomer and composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1993;9:63-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90108-3

Dionysopoulos P, Gerasimou P, Tolidis K. The effect of home-use fluoride gels on glass-ionomer, compomer and composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(7):683-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01104.x

Lopes MB, Saquy PC, Moura SK, Wang L, Graciano FMO, Correr Sobrinho L, et al. Effect of different surface penetrating sealants on the roughness of a nanofiller composite resin. Braz Dent. J 2012;23:692-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402012000600011

Downloads

Published

2017-11-23

Issue

Vol. 32 No. 2 (2017)

Section

Original Article

License

COPYRIGHT
The submission of originals to Odonto Ciência implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Odonto Ciência as the site of original publication.

CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE
As this journal is open access, the articles are allowed free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source.
According to the type of Creative Commons License (CC-BY 4.0) adopted by Odonto Ciência, the user must respect the requirements below.

You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

However, only under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests Odonto Ciência endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

For more details on the Creative Commons license, please follow the link in the footer of this website.