Critical retourn to the notion of ethos

Authors

  • Dominique Maingueneau Sorbonne Université

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2018.3.32914

Keywords:

discourse analysis, ethos, discursive ethos, incorporation, matchmaking website.

Abstract

This article aims at criticizing the way the notion of discursive ethos has been generally used by discourse analysts for about fifteen years. This criticism is at the same time self-criticism, because from the 1980’s on I contributed to develop this field of research. Firstly, I try to analyze the content of the notion of ethos, which I divide into three dimensions: “categorial”, “experiential”, “ideological”. Such a division allows us to take into account the full diversity of activity. Secondly, I reflect on the very process through which addressees construct ethos; this reflection draws on data from matchmaking websites, not from the kind of corpora (political discourse, advertising, literature...) that are usually analyzed by the researchers who work on ethos. Thirdly, this article deals with the problems that one encounters when one studies texts in which iconic and verbal dimensions are tightly connected. Two kinds of data are taken into consideration: websites, which imply both digital and verbal ethos, and commercials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AMOSSY, R. (Dir.). Images de soi dans le discours. La construction de l’éthos. Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé, 1999.

ARISTOTE. Rhétorique. Tradução M. Dufour. Paris: Les Belles-Lettres, 1967.

AUCHLIN, A. Éthos et expérience du discours: quelques remarques. In: Wauthion , M.; Simon , A. C. (Dir.). Politesse et idéologie. Rencontres de pragmatique et de rhétorique conversationnelle. Louvain: Peeters, 2001. p. 7-95.

BASSO FOSSALI, P. L.; DONDERO, M. G. Sémiotique de la photographie. Limoges: Presses Universitaires de Limoges, 2011.

DUCROT, O. Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit, 1984.

MAINGUENEAU, D. Genèses du discours. Liège: Mardaga, 1984.

MAINGUENEAU, D. Analyser les textes de communication. Paris: Dunod, 1998.

MAINGUENEAU, D. Lecture, incorporation et monde éthique. Études de linguistique appliquée, v. 119, p. 265-276, 2000.

MAINGUENEAU, D. Problèmes d’éthos. Pratiques, p. 55-68, 2002.

MAINGUENEAU, D. Retour critique sur l’éthos. Langage et société, v. 149, n. 3, p. 31-48, 2014.

RABATEL, A. L’effacement énonciatif dans les discours rapportés et ses effets pragmatiques. Langages, v. 156, p. 3-17, 2004.

RÉCANATI, F. Les énoncés performatifs. Contribution à la pragmatique. Paris: Minuit, 1981.

VION, R. “Effacement énonciatif” et stratégies discursives. In: De Mattia , M.; Joly , A. (Dir.). De la syntaxe à la narratologie énonciative. Gap: Orphys, 2001. p. 331-354.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-30

How to Cite

Maingueneau, D. (2018). Critical retourn to the notion of ethos. Letras De Hoje, 53(3), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2018.3.32914

Issue

Vol. 53 No. 3 (2018): The discursive ethos: scope, challenges and potentialities

Section

Ethos Discursivo: Alcance, Desafios e Potencialidades

License

Copyright

The submission of originals to Letras de Hoje implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Letras de Hoje as the site of original publication.

Creative Commons License

Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.