Sentence disambiguation in the phonology-syntax-semantic interface
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2018.1.28698Keywords:
Syntactic ambiguity, Syntactic parsing, Phonology-syntax-semantics interfaceAbstract
We start from the results presented by Angelo & Santos (2017) on the disambiguation of sentences based on prosodic clues to try to clarify an issue that was unsolved in their research. The authors applied a comprehension task regarding sentences with NP1-V-NP2-Attribute structure (e.g. O pai visitou o filho feliz, ‘The father visited the son happy’ – ambiguous structure in Portuguese). One of their conclusions was that syllable stretching in the NP2 formed distinct prosodic domains between NP2 and the Attribute ([visitou o filhoϕ] [felizϕ], ‘[visited the sonφ] [happyφ]’), and that favors a non-local interpretation of the Attribute (one in which the Attribute is interpreted as modifying the subject, NP1, and not object, NP2). However, the authors noticed
a variation between interpretations with local and nonlocal apposition in the comprehension of sentences without prosodic elongation. That is, according to the authors, the absence of prosodic marking would not favor one or the other interpretation, whereas elongated prosodic marking would favor a non-local interpretation. In our work, we argue that the disambiguation of this type of sentence depends basically on the resolution of a conflict between three different
grammatical principles that are acting together in the disambiguation of sentences with this structure: a prosodic principle, a syntactic-computational principle and a semantic-pragmatic principle. In order to prove our point, we developed an off-line sentence comprehension test and applied it to 270 informants. Our results point to an interaction between these three principles
in the resolution of the ambiguity of these sentences.
Downloads
References
ALTMANN, G.; STEEDMAN, M. Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, v. 30, n. 191, p. 191-238, 1988.
ANGELO, M. C.; SANTOS, R. S. A prosódia em sentenças sintaticamente ambíguas do Português Brasileiro: Pistas de duração. Alfa: Revista de Lingüística, UNESP, v. 59, p. 375-403, 2015.
ANGELO, M. C.; SANTOS, R. S. Desambiguização de sentenças na interface fonologia-sintaxe: resultados perceptuais. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, v. 23, n. 3, 2017.
CR AIN, S.; STEEDMAN, M. On not being led up the Garden path: the use of context by the psychological parser. In: DOWTY, D. R.; KARTTUNEN, L.; ZWICKY, A. M. (Ed.). Natural language processing: Psychological, computational and theoretical perspectives. Cambridge: CUP, 1985.
CUETOS, F.; MITCHELL , D. C. Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, v. 30, p. 73-105, 1988.
FINGER, I.; ZIMMER, M. A preferência de interpretação de orações relativas curtas e longas em português brasileiro. In: MAIA, M.; FINGER, I. (Orgs.). Processamento de Linguagem. Pelotas: Educat, 2005. p. 111-130.
FODOR, J. D. Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Springer Link, n. 27, p. 285-319, 1998.
FODOR, J. D. Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading. Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, n. 32, p. 113-132, 2002.
FODOR, J. D. A Psicolingüística não pode escapar da prosódia. In: MAIA, M.; FINGER, I. (Org.). Processamento de Linguagem. Pelotas: Educat, 2005. p. 51-69.
FONSECA, A. A.; MAGALHÃES, J. O. A influência de pistas prosódicas no processamento de frases: um estudo da estrutura SN1-V-SN2-ATRIBUTO no português brasileiro. Alfa – Revista de Linguística, São Paulo, v. 33, n. 55, p. 1-18, 2008.
FRAZIER, L. On comprehending sentences: syntactic parsing strategies. Tese (Doutorado) – University of Connecticut, 1979.
FRAZIER, L.; CL IFTON JR., C. Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
FRAZIER, L.; FODOR, J. D. The sausage machine:A new twostage parsing model. Cognition, v. 6, n. 4, p. 291-325, 1978.
FRAZIER, L.; RAYNER, K. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of tructurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive psychology, v. 14, n. 2, p. 178-210, 1982.
GIBSON, E.; BR OIHIER, K. Optimality Theory and Human Sentence Processing. In: BARB OSA, P. et al. (Ed.). Is the best good enough? Optimality and competition in syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998. p. 157-191.
HAGOORT, P. On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Science, v. 9, p. 416-423, 2005.
MAGALHÃES, J. O.; MAIA, M. Pistas prosódicas implícitas na resolução de ambiguidades sintáticas: um caso de adjunção de Atributos. Revista da ABRALIN, Florianópolis, v. 5, n. 1-2, p. 143-167, 2006.
MAIA, M. O acesso semântico no parsing sintático: evidências experimentais. Alfa – Revista de Linguística, v. 42, n. 1, 1998.
MIYAMOTO, E. T. Relative clause processing in Brazilian Portuguese and Japanese. 1999. Tese (Doutorado) – MIT, Massachusetts, 1999.
MIYAMOTO, E. T. Orações relativas ambíguas e a homogeneidade do processamento de sentenças. In: MAIA, M.; FINGER, I. (Org.). Processamento de Linguagem. Pelotas: Educat, 2005. p. 71-90.
NESPOR, M.; VOGEL, I. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1986.
RIBEIRO, A. J. C. Late closure em parsing no português do Brasil. In: MAIA, M.; FINGER, I. (Org.), Processamento de Linguagem. Pelotas: Educat, 2005. p. 51-69.
RIBEIRO, A. J. C. Late Closure e Good-Enough no processamento de frases garden-path do português do Brasil: evidências de eyetracking. ReVEL, v. 10, n. 18, 2012.
RODD , J. M., DAVIS, M. H.; JONHSTRUDE, I. S. The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex, v. 15, p. 1261-1269, 2005.
RODD , J. M.; LONGE, O. A.; RANDALL , B.; TYL ER, L. K. The functional organization of the fronto-temporal language system: evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity. Neuropsychologia, v. 48, p. 1324-1335, 2010.
SELKIRK, E. Phonology and Syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1984.
SPIVEY-KNOWLTON, M.; SEDIVY, J. C. Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints. Cognition, v. 55, n. 3, p. 227-267, 1995.
SPIVEY-KNOWLTON, M.; TANENHAUS, M. K. Referential context and syntactic ambiguity resolution. In: CL IFTON, C.; FRAZIER, L; RAYNER, K. (Ed.). Perspectives in sentence processing. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1994. p. 415-439.
TRUESWELL , J. C.; TANENHAUS, M. K.; GARNSEY, S. M. Semantic influences on parsing: Use of the thematic role information in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 33, n. 3, 1994.
WILL EMS, R. M.; HAGOORT, P. Broca’s region: battles are not won by ignoring half of the facts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, v. 13, p. 101, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Letras de Hoje implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Letras de Hoje as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.
