Use of triggers tool to identify adverse drug events in an university hospital

Authors

  • Leticia dos Santos Sanches Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
  • Fabíola Giordani Universidade Federal Fluminense http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2919-856X
  • Jakeline Liara Teleken Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
  • Ana Flávia Gallas Leivas Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
  • Raysa Cristina Schmidt Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
  • Jessica Cristina Balbinot Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
  • Anna Paula Moreira Garbuio Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná
  • Simone Cavalli Pianna Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1983-652X.2016.3.24345

Keywords:

adverse drug reaction reporting systems, drug monitoring, hospitals, hospitalization.

Abstract

Objective: To identify adverse drug events (ADE) in adults patients hospitalized in medical and surgical units of a university hospital, as well as to characterize these events.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed in a university hospital. The sample consisted of patients admitted to the medical and surgical units between October 1st, 2010 and January 31st, 2011. In order to identify the  DE, a set of triggers was applied, which are conditions that may indicate that an ADE occurred and make the review of records more objective and direct. These triggers can be an altered laboratory test, the use of an antidote or a clinical condition.
Results: The study group consisted of two hundred and sixty-three patients, of whom fifty-eight (22.1%) had at least one ADE during hospitalization and 83 ADE were identified, resulting in a rate of 31.5 ADE per 100 patients. The most common events were nausea and vomiting, rash and itching and hypokalemia. As for the alleged drug, tramadol was most often related to the events. The events were more present in patients with urgent/emergency hospitalization, that had one or more comorbidities. Also, patients with ADE had a longer average time of hospitalization.
Conclusion: The use of triggers to identify ADE presents as a useful strategy, from which it was possible to identify that 22.1% of patients had an ADE during hospitalization. This strategy to identify the events is likely to be implemented by patient safety core hospitals.

References

SP-SQS - Committee of Experts on Management of Safety and Quality in Health Care. Expert group on safe medication practices. Glossary of terms related to patient and medication safety [Internet]. WHO; 2005 [cited 2016 Jun 21]. Available from: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/highlights/COE_patient_and_medication_safety_gl.pdf

Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err Is Human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: IOM; 2000.

Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S, Green C, Scott AK, Walley TJ, Farrar K, Park BK, Breckenridge AM. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):15-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7456.15

Martins AC, Giordani F, Rozenfeld S. Adverse drug events among adult inpatients: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2014;39(6):609-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12204

Griffin FA, Resar RK. IHI Global Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Events [Internet]. Cambridge: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2009. [cited 2016 Jun 21]. Available from: http://www.ihi.org

Hougland P, Xu W, Pickard S, Masheter C, Williams SD. Performance of International Classification Of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes as an adverse drug event surveillance system. Med Care. 2006;44(7):629-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000215859.06051.77

Rozenfeld S. Drug adverse events in hospitals in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rev Saude Publ. 2007;41(1):108-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102006005000012

Cox AR, Anton C, Goh CH, Easter M, Langford NJ, Ferner RE. Adverse drug reactions in patients admitted to hospital identified by discharge ICD-10 codes and by spontaneous reports. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52(6):337-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01454.x

Lugardon S, Desboeuf K, Fernet P, Montastruc JL, Lapeyre-Mestre M. Using a capture-recapture method to assess the frequency of adverse drug reactions in a French university hospital. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 006;62(2):225-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02633.x

Romero AV, Malone DC. Accuracy of adverse-drug-event reports collected using an automated dispensing system. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005;62(13):1375-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2146/ajhp040345

Otero MJ, Dominguez-Gil A. Drug-induced adverse avents. An emerging pa-thology. Farm Hosp. 2000;24:258-66.

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Trigger tool for measuring adverse drug events [Internet]. Cambridge, MA: IHI; 2004. [cited 2015 Dez 07]. Available from: http://www.ihi.org/NR/rdonlyres/8D970CE4-

BF8C-4F35-9BC1-51358FC8B43F/2222/TriggerToolforMeasuringAdverseDrugEventsCorrected1.pdf

Senst BL, Achusim LE, Genest RP, Cosentino LA, Ford CC, Little JA, Raybon SJ, Bates DW. Practical approach to determining costs and frequency of adverse drug events in a health care network. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2001;58(12):1126-32.

Resar RK, Rozich JD, Classen D. Methodology and rationale for the measurement of harm with trigger tools. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12 Suppl 2:ii39-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii39

Forster AJ, Halil RB, Tierney MG. Pharmacist surveillance of adverse drug events. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61(14):1466-72.

Giordani F, Rozenfeld S, de Oliveira DF, da Silva Versa GL, Terencio JS, Caldeira Lde F, Gonçalves de Andrade LC. Vigilância de eventos adversos a medicamentos em hospitais: aplicação e desempenho de rastreadores. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2012;15(3):455-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2012000300002

Handler SM, Altman RL, Perera S, Hanlon JT, Studenski SA, Bost JE, Saul MI, Fridsma DB. A systematic review of the performance characteristics of clinical event monitor signals used to detect adverse drug events in the hospital setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(4):451-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2369

Tribi-o G, Maldonado C, Segura O, Díaz J. Costos directos y aspectos clínicos de las reacciones adversas a medicamentos en pacientes hospitalizados en el servicio de medicina interna de una instituición de tercer nivel de Bogotá. Biomedica. 2006;26(1):31-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.v26i1.1392

Schade CP, Hannah K, Ruddick P, Starling C, Brehm J. Improving self-reporting of adverse drug events in a West Virginia hospital. Am J Med Qual. 2006;21(5):335-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1062860606291322

Weingart SN, Toth M, Eneman J, Aronson MD, Sands DZ, Ship AN, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Lessons from a patient partnership intervention to prevent adverse drug events. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16(6):499-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzh083

Davies EC, Green CF, Mottram DR, Pirmohamed M. Adverse drug reactions in hospital in-patients: a pilot study. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2006;31(4):335-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.2006.00744.x

Hwang SH, Lee S, Koo HK, Kim Y. Evaluation of a computerbased adverse-drug-event monitor. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008;65(23):2265-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.2146/ajhp080122

Silva DC, Araujo OR, Arduini RG, Alonso CF, Shibata AR, Troster EJ. Adverse drug events in a pediatric intensive care unit: a prospective cohort. BMJ Open. 2013;3(2).pii:e001868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001868

Classen DC, Pestotnik SL, Evans RS, Burke JP. Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients. JAMA. 1991;266(20):2847-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991. 03470200059035

Sánchez Mu-oz-Torrero JF, Barquilla P, Velasco R, Fernández Capitan Mdel C, Pacheco N, Vicente L, Chicón JL, Trejo S, Zamorano J, Lorenzo Hernandez A. Adverse drug reactions in internal medicine units and associated risk factors. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66(12):1257-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0866-6

Published

2016-11-24

Issue

Section

Original Articles