Comparison of laser and led in the process of healing cutaneous wounds: a review

Authors

  • Simone de Paula Universidade Feevale, PUCRS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1983-652X.2016.1.21840

Keywords:

wound healing, phototherapy, LASER.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review was to present and compare the current scientific evidence on the therapeutic effects of low level LASER and LED in the cutaneous healing process through the analysis of experimental studies in rodents.
Materials and Methods: Literature review, carried out through a search in the Medline/PubMed and SciELO databases. Original and experimental articles available in full that aimed to compare the therapeutic LASER and LED effects on the skin healing process were selected. The keywords and boolean operators used to search the databases were: wound healing OR healing AND laser AND led. Articles published in English and Portuguese were included.
Results: From a total of 232 articles found, five studies were selected for this literature review. Year of publication ranged from 2007 to 2015. Three studies used LASERs and LEDs with red wavelengths (λ<700 nm) and two studies used both red and infrared spectra in the analyzed groups. Most of the studies conducted a protocol with at least two applications of LASER or LED through the contact technique. The energy density ranged from 2.5 J/cm2 to 40 J/cm2.
Conclusion: Despite the methodological variability in the researchers found, the results of these studies showed satisfactory histological and immunohistochemical outcomes, suggesting that these therapies can significantly facilitate the tissue repair process. However, further studies should be performed in order to establish safe and effective clinical strategies for the use of phototherapy in wound healing.

Author Biography

Simone de Paula, Universidade Feevale, PUCRS

Fisioterapeuta especialista em fisioterapia dermatofuncional (PUCRS), Mestre e Doutora em Saúde da Criança (PUCRS), docente do curso de Fisioterapia da Universidade Feevale.

References

Kede MPV. Dermatologia estética. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2009.

Flanagen M. Wound healing and skin integrity: principles and practice. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.

Campos ACL, Borges-Branco A, Groth AK. Wound healing. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2007;20(1):51-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202007000100010

Brasil. Manual de condutas para úlceras neutróficas e traumáticas. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2002.

Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(10):738-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM 199909023411006

Whinfield AL, Aitkenhead I. The light revival: does phototherapy promote wound healing? A review. Foot (Edinb). 2009;19(2): 117-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2009.01.004

Peplow PV, Chung TY, Baxter GD. Laser photobiomodulation of wound healing: a review of experimental studies in mouse and rat animal models. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010;28(3):291-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2008.2446

Schreml S, Szeimies RM, Prantl L, Landthaler M, Babilas P. Wound healing in the 21st century. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63(5): 866-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.10.048

Nouri K. Lasers in dermatology and medicine. Miami: Springer; 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-281-0

Barolet D. Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in dermatology. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2008;27(4):227-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sder.2008.08.003

Roelandts R. The history of phototherapy: something new under the sun? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46(6):926-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2002.121354

Mester E, Mester AF, Mester A. The biomedical effects of laser application. Lasers Surg Med. 1985;5(1):31-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900050105

Avci P, Gupta A, Sadasivam M, Vecchio D, Pam Z, Pam N, Hamblin MR. Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) in skin: stimulating, healing, restoring. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2013;32(1):41-52.

Woodruff LD, Bounkeo JM, Brannon WM, Dawes KS, Barham CD, Waddell DL, Enwemeka CS. The efficacy of laser therapy in wound repair: a meta-analysis of the literature. Photomed Laser Surg. 2004;22(3):241-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/1549541041438623

Whelan HT, Smits RL Jr, Buchman EV, Whelan NT, Turner SG, Margolis DA, Cevenini V, Stinson H, Ignatius R, Martin T, Cwiklinski J, Philippi AF, Graf WR, Hodgson B, Gould L, Kane M, Chen G, Caviness J. Effect of NASA light-emitting diode irradiation on wound healing. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2001;19(6):305-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/104454701753342758

Whelan HT, Buchmann EV, Dhokalia A, Kane MP, Whelan NT, Wong-Riley MT, Eells JT, Gould LJ, Hammamieh R, Das R, Jett M. Effect of NASA light-emitting diode irradiation on wound healing. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2003;21(2):67-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/104454703765035484

Dall Agnol MA, Nicolau RA, De Lima CJ, Munin E. Comparative analysis of coherent light action (laser) versus non-coherent light (light-emitting diode) for tissue repair in diabetic rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24(6):909-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0648-5

De Sousa AP, Paraguassú GM, Silveira NT, Souza J, Cangussú MC, Santos JN, Pinheiro AL. Laser and LED phototherapies on angiogenesis. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(3):981-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1187-z

Oliveira Sampaio SC, de C Monteiro JS, Cangussú MC, Pires Santos GM, dos Santos MA, dos Santos JN, Pinheiro AL. Effect of laser and LED phototherapies on the healing of cutaneous wound on healthy and iron deficient Wistar rats and their impact on fibroblastic activity during wound healing. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(3):799-806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1161-9

Corazza AV, Jorge J, Kurachi C, Bagnato VS. Photobiomodulation on the angiogenesis of skin wounds in rats using different light sources. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007;25(2):102-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2006.2011

de Vasconcelos Catão MH, Nonaka CF, de Albuquerque RL Jr, Bento PM, de Oliveira Costa R. Effects of red laser, infrared, photodynamic therapy, and green LED on the healing process of third-degree burns: clinical and histological study in rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(1):421-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1687-0

Enoch S, Leaper DJ. Basic science of wound healing. Surgery. 2008;26(2):37-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2007. 11.005

Huang YY, Sharma SK, Carroll J, Hamblin MR. Biphasic dose response in low level light therapy – an update. Dose Response. 2011; 9(4):602-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.11-009. Hamblin

Tuner JHL. Laser Therapy: Clinical practice and Scientific Background. Sweden: Prima Books; 2002.

Vinck EM, Cagnie BJ, Cornelissen MJ, Declercq HA, Cambier DC. Increased fibroblast proliferation induced by light emitting diode and low power laser irradiation. Lasers Med Sci. 2003;18(2):95-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-003-0262-x

Schubert E. Light-Emitting Diodes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790546

Ihsan FR. Low-level laser therapy accelerates collateral circulation and enhances microcirculation. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005;23(3): 289-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2005.23.289

Hussein AJ, Alfars AA, Falih MA, Hassan AN. Effects of a low level laser on the acceleration of wound healing in rabbits. N Am J Med Sci. 2011;3(4):193-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.4297/najms.2011.3193

Colombo F, Neto Ade A, Sousa AP, Marchionni AM, Pinheiro AL, Reis SR. Effect of low-level laser therapy on angiogenesis in wound healing: a immunohistochemical study in a rodent model. Braz Dent J. 2013;24(4):308-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201301867

De Sousa AP, Santos JN, Dos Reis JA Jr, Ramos TA, de Souza J, Cangussú MC, Pinheiro AL.Effect of LED phototherapy of three distinct wavelengths on fibroblasts on wound healing: a histological study in a rodent model. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010;28(4):547-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2605

Smith KC. Laser (and LED) therapy is phototherapy. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005;23(1):78-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pho.2005.23.78

Published

2016-05-13

Issue

Section

Review Articles