Influence of the type of delivery on the outcome of urinary incontinence physical therapy treatment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1983-652X.2012.2.11096Keywords:
urinary incontinence, parturition, women, women's health, pregnancyAbstract
Objectives: To analyze the influence of the type of delivery on the pelvic floor muscle strength (PFMS) of women with urinary incontinence (UI), before and after physical therapy intervention and the relationship between the different types of UI and type of delivery. Materials and Methods: In this nonrandomized, uncontrolled clinical trial, 46 women (35 to 78 years) with a medical diagnosis of UI (stress – SUI, mixed – MUI, urgency – UUI), who did not undergo gynecological surgery were included. The voluntaries were evaluated (perineometry and bidigital test) and undertook a conservative treatment consisting of pelvic floor exercise and transvaginal electrical stimulation. Results: The mean age was 53.6±10.5 years. Half the voluntaries had MUI, 39.1% had SUI and 10.9% UUI. After treatment, the women who had had normal delivery presented a significant increase in the PFMS, both measured by the perineometer (p=0.031; paired Student´s T test) and by the bidigital test (p≤0.05; Wilcoxon’s Test), while the women who had cesarean section or both types of delivery did not present a significant gain. The relationship between the type of delivery and types of UI did not present a significant difference. Over 80% of the women that had normal delivery or cesarean section were continent or satisfied after the treatment. Conclusion: The voluntaries that had normal delivery presented the greatest gains in the PFMS. Notwithstanding, the type of delivery did not influence the results of the physical therapy intervention regarding urinary continence, since the majority of the women treated reported being continent or satisfied with the treatment.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT
The submission of originals to Ciência & Saúde implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Ciência & Saúde as the site of original publication.
CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE
As this journal is open access, the articles are allowed free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source.
According to the type of Creative Commons License (CC-BY 4.0) adopted by Ciência & Saúde , the user must respect the requirements below.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
However, only under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests Ciência & Saúde endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
For more details on the Creative Commons license, please follow the link in the footer of this website.