Social function and judicial reorganization procedure: a social function under new approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7718.2015.2.21436Keywords:
Social function. Property. Enterprise. Bankruptcy and reorganization. aAbstract
The analysis of the enterprise social function takes into consideration the principles of the Brazilian Federal Constitution. Since 1988, , some political models, as well as economic thoughts of liberalism and interventionism, have been analyzed in order to untangle the principles defended constitutionally to establish the social function of the enterprise.
Based on that, focus is directed to the social function, discussing according to several doctrinal tendencies. The positions are examined, both as from the comparative law perspective, as well as from the national law, to demonstrate that the social function of the enterprise, according to the public interest, may be understood according to Coase’s lessons.
References
ALLEGRI, Vincenzo. Contributo allo studio della responsabilità civile degli amministratori. Milano: Giuffrè, 1979.
CHALHUB, Melhin Namen. Função Social da Propriedade, Revista da EMERJ, Rio de Janeiro, v. 6, n. 24, 2003.
COASE, Ronald. The Nature of the Firm. Disponível em: <http://www3.nccu.edu.tw/~jsfeng/CPEC11.pdf>.
COMPARATO, Fábio Konder. Função Social da Propriedade dos Bens de Produção. Revista de Direito Mercantil, v. 63, p. 71-79, 1986.
COSTA, Carla. O modelo alemão e a “economia social de mercado” num contexto de globalização. Disponível em: <http://www.dpp.pt/pages/files/infor_inter_1999_II_I.pdf>.
DE MORAIS, Alexandre. Direito Constitucional. 24. ed., 2ª reimpr. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
FRANCO, Vera Helena de Mello, Recuperação e função social da empresa: reavaliando antigos temas, In: Revista dos Tribunais,
São Paulo, n. 913, nov. 2011.
FRANCO, Vera Helena de Mello. Direito Empresarial. 4. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2012. v. I.
FRANCO, Vera Helena de Mello; SZTAJN, R. Recuperação e função social da empresa: reavaliando antigos temas. Revista dos Tribunais, São Paulo), v. 913, p. 177-191, 2011.
FRANCO, Vera Helena de Mello; SZTAIN, Rachel. Falência e recuperação da empresa em cCrise – comparação com as posições do direito europeu, São Paulo: Campus Elsevier, 2008.
GIERKE, Otto von. Die Genossenschaftstheorie und die deutsche Rechtsprechung. Berlin: Weidmann, 1887. LIV, 1024 S.
JAEGER, Píer Giusto. L’Interesse sociale. Milão: Giuffrè, 1972.
KLEIN, Caroline Rippe de Mello. O ordoliberalismo alemão expresso no ideário econômico de Roberto Campos. Disponível em: <http://www.historialivre.com/revistahistoriador/cinco/8caroline.pdf>.
MACARIO, Francesco. Commentário del Códice Civile – Direto da Enrico Gabrielli, Della Proprietà – a cura di Antonio Jannarelli e Francesco Macario, art. 310-368, Milano: Wolters Kluwer, 2012. Libro III, Titulo II.
MINERVINI, Gustavo. Società, associazioni, gruppi organizzati. Nápoles: Scientifiche italiane, 1973.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT
The submission of originals to Direito & Justiça implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Direito & Justiça as the site of original publication.
CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE
As this journal is open access, the articles are allowed free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source.
According to the type of Creative Commons License (CC-BY 4.0) adopted by Direito & Justiça, the user must respect the requirements below.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
However, only under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests Direito & Justiça endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
For more details on the Creative Commons license, please follow the link in the footer of this website.
