THE PRIMARY REQUIREMENT OF THE DEFINITION OF EXPERIENCE: THE RECIPROCITY OF THE NOTIONS OF SUBJECT AND OBJECT
Abstract
In this paper we present our conception of method of proof of Kant’s transcendental deduction developed elsewhere: we ascribe it a regressive argument, which includes a reply to Hume’s skepticism, for, differently from Ameriks (1978) who has understood the transcendental deduction as starting from the premiss that “we have some empirical knowledge”, we understand the transcendental deduction as starting from a definition of experience. This definition is the link of the debate between Kant and Hume. After this presentation, we show how the reciprocity of the notions of subject and object are exigencies of that definition of experience itself and that is the task of the transcendental philosophy to explain how (through which power of knowledge?) this demand can be reached. KEY WORDS: Kant. Transcendental deduction. Transcendental argument.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2009-10-13
How to Cite
Teles (UFRGS), A. (2009). THE PRIMARY REQUIREMENT OF THE DEFINITION OF EXPERIENCE: THE RECIPROCITY OF THE NOTIONS OF SUBJECT AND OBJECT. Intuitio, 2(2), 124–130. Retrieved from https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/intuitio/article/view/5947
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Intuitio implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Intuitio as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.