ETHICS AND LOGICITY – A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN HEGEL AND ADORNO
Abstract
The hegelian philosophy, as systematic project for overcoming kantian split between thing and thing in itself, estimates a common logic to the reality and individual knowledge. This relationship unfolds itself in the passing over of the bourgeois to the citizen condition as the knowing that it is raised of the instrumental economic relations to the ethical State. The well aimed by the personal action, in knowing it bases that it, becomes true the social mediation the measure of the systematic necessity of the relations. The escape to the rational-systematic intention that deprives the positivity as a well will make the reflection of Adorno. The perversion of the social relations by the cultural industry vetoes the particular reason to the liberating dimension of the culture. The individual does not establish in reasons its particular end that remains separate to the universal interest. From bourgeois poíesis it does not emerge the citizen praxis. The social mediation remains instrumental in the civil Society as place of the antiluminism. Soon, the veto of the reason to the bedding of acting prescribes the true practical reason and the only pertinent ethical position to the social relations.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2009-12-04
How to Cite
Portella (UNISINOS), S. (2009). ETHICS AND LOGICITY – A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN HEGEL AND ADORNO. Intuitio, 2(3), 279–297. Retrieved from https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/intuitio/article/view/5752
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright
The submission of originals to Intuitio implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Intuitio as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.