Phenomenological empathy

Scenarios and possibilities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2022.1.41354

Keywords:

Empathy, Phenomenology, Philosophy

Abstract

This article aims to produce a study on empathy from a phenomenological perspective. Therefore, a distinction will be made between the various meanings and uses of the word empathy in contemporaneity. Afterward, the various theories and explanatory models of empathy will be analyzed based on the question of “how” human consciousness accesses the external world. Among the explanatory models explored, we can highlight the Theory – Theory (TT), the Simulation Theory (ST), the Integrated Theory (IT), the graded empathy hypothesis (GEH), the Reintegrated Theory (RT) model. Once this is done, the phenomenological proposal for the issue of empathy will be explored more thoroughly. Finally, it will seek, in the light of the phenomenological perspective, to advance in the reflection on empathy based on three ideas: resonance, affectation and inter implication, seeking to develop the first steps towards an immanent inter intentionality. As limits and possibilities, it can be noted that it is necessary to explore more the processes of empathy modularization in the process of constitution of the ego, especially in pre-ego life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Gillianno José Mazzetto de Castro, Centro universitário Católica do Tocantins (UniCatólica), Palmas, TO, Brasil.

Doutor e mestre em Psicologia pela Universidade Católica Dom Bosco (UCDB), em Campo Grande, MS, Brasil – com estágio doutoral na Universidade da Califórnia- Berkeley, EUA; pós-doutorando em Filosofia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUC-RS), em Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil; graduado em filosofia pela Universidade Católica Dom Bosco(UCDB); diploma em Teologia pela Pontifícia Universidade Salesiana, na Itália; curso de formação em líderes educacionais pela Universidade de Harvard, EUA; Pós-graduação em Growth Hacking & Agile Mindset pela HSM University. Reitor do Centro universitário Católica do Tocantins (UniCatólica), em Palmas, TO, Brasil.

References

BARRETT, L. F. How emotions are made: the secret life of the brain. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017. 449 p.

BATSON, C. D. These things called Empathy: Eight related but Distinct Phenomena. In: DECETY, J.; ICKES, W. (ed.) The Social Neuroscience of Empathy. Massachusetts, NE: A Bradford Book, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002

BATSON, C. D. Empathy and altruism. In: BROWN, K. W.; LEARY, M. R. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Hypo-Egoic Phenomena. Oxford: Oxford Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328079.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328079.013.11

BENDAS, J. et al. Dynamics of affective habituation to touch differ on the group and individual level. Neuroscience, Netherlands, v. 464, p. 44-52, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.12.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.12.024

BLANCHET, R. Empathy as the Opposite of Egocentrism: Why the Simulation Theory and the Direct Perception Theory of Empathy Fail. Topoi, Rio de Janeiro, v. 39, n. 4, p. 751-759, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-09630-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-09630-5

BROWN, C. L. et al. Emotional empathy in the social regulation of distress: A dyadic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, [S. I.], v. 47, n. 6, p. 1004-1019, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F0146167220953987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220953987

CEUNEN, E.; VAN DIEST, I.; VLAEYEN, J. Accuracy and awareness of perception: related, yet distinct (commentary on Herbert et al., 2012). Biological Psychology, Netherlands, v. 92, n. 2, p. 423-427, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.09.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.09.012

DARWALL, S. Empathy, Sympathy, Care. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, [S. I.], v. 89, n. 2-3, p. 261-282, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004289113917

DAVIS, M. H. Empathy: a social psychological approach. New York: Routledge, 2018. 272 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429493898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429493898

DECETY, J.; JACKSON, P. L. The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, [S. I.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 71-100, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1534582304267187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187

DECETY, J.; ICKES, W. (ed.). The Social Neuroscience of Empathy. Massachusetts: A Bradford Book, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.001.0001

DIMBERG, U.; THUNBERG, M.; ELMEHED, K. Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science, [S. I.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 86-89, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-9280.00221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00221

DVASH, J.; SHAMAY-TSOORY, S. G. Theory of mind and empathy as multidimensional constructs: Neurological foundations. Topics in Language Disorders, Philadelphia, v. 34, n. 4, p. 282-295, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000040

ESLINGER, P. J. Neurological and neuropsychological bases of empathy. European Neurology, Basel, v. 39, n. 4, p. 193-199, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000007933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000007933

FERRARI, P. F. The neuroscience of social relations. A comparative-based approach to empathy and to the capacity of evaluating others’ action value. Behaviour, Leiden, v. 151, n. 2-3, p. 297-313, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003152

FUCHS, T. Depression, Intercorporeality and Interaffectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies, Cincinnati, v. 20, n. 7-8, 2013.

FUCHS, T.; KOCH, S. C. Embodied affectivity: on moving and being moved. Frontiers in Psychology, Lausanne, v. 5, p. 1-12, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00508

GALLAGHER, S. Empathy, simulation, and narrative. Science in Context, Tel Aviv, v. 25, n. 3, p. 355-381, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0269889712000117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889712000117

GARFINKEL, S. N. et al. Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological Psychology, Netherlands, v. 104, p. 65-74, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004

GEORGIOU, E. et al. Interaction of physical activity and interoception in children. Front Psychol, [S. I.], v. 6, p. 1-8, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00502

GROARK, K. P. Comment on Throop and Zahavi, Dark and Bright Empathy: Phenomenological and Anthropological Reflections. Current Anthropology, Chicago, v. 61, n. 3, p. 294-295.

GUO, C. C. The neuroscience of empathy. In: MAIBON, H. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy. London: Routledge, 2019.

HATFIELD, E. et al. New Perspectives on Emotional Contagion: A Review of Classic and Recent Research on Facial Mimicry and Contagion. Interpersona, [S. I.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 159-179, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.2195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v8i2.162

HENRY, M. Philosophie et phénoménologie du corps. Paris: PUF, 1965.

HENRY, M. Phénomenologie Materielle. Paris: PUF, 1990.

HENRY, M. Incarnation: Une philosophie de la chair. Paris: Seuil, 1998.

HENRY, M. Auto-donation. Paris: Beauchesne, 2004.

HUSSERL, E. Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Teil. Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975.

HUSSERL, E. Meditações Cartesianas: Introdução à Fenomenologia. São Paulo: Madras, 2001.

HUSSERL, E. Sur Líntersubjectivité, I. Paris: PUF, 2001.

HUSSERL, E. Zur phänomenologischen Reduktion. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1926-1935), (Husserliana XXXIV). Dordrecht: Springer Verlag, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0574-6

HUSSERL, E. Idées directrices pour une phénoménologie et une philosophie phenomenologique pures. Livre Second. Paris: PUF, 2004.

HUSSERL, E. Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005.

HUSSERL, E. Expérience et Jugement. Paris: PUF, 2006a.

HUSSERL, E. Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (1929- 1934). Die C-Manuskripte (Husserliana Materialien VIII). Dordrecht: Springer Verlag, 2006b.

HUSSERL, E. Idée directrices pour une phénoménologie. Paris: Gallimard, 2008.

HUSSERL, E. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Erster Teil. Nague: Martinus Nijhoff. 1973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2474-7

ICKES, W. Empathic Accuracy. Journal of Personality, Massachusetts, v. 61, p. 587-610, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00783.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00783.x

IRARRÁZAVAL, L. Empathy for the foreign experience: A convergent phenomenological definition. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, [S. I.], v. 40, n. 3, p. 174-186, 2020. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/teo0000128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000128

ISRAELASHVILI, J.; SAUTER, D.; FISCHER, A. Two facets of affective empathy: concern and distress have opposite relationships to emotion recognition. Cognition and Emotion, v. 34, n. 6, p. 1112-1122, 2020. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1724893. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1724893

JIANG, Y.; WANG, J. A study of cultural empathy in foreign language teaching from the perspective of cross-cultural communication. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, [S. I.], v. 8, n. 12, p. 1664-1670, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0812.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0812.12

JOSPE, K.; FLÖEL, A.; LAVIDOR, M. The interactive effect of empathy and motor cortex stimulation on hand gesture comprehension. Neuropsychologia, Netherlands, v. 141, p. 1-8, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107412

LANZONI, S. Empathy: A history. New Haven: Yale University Press. 2017

LANZONI, S. Empathy’s translation: Three paths from Einfühlung into Anglo-American Psychology. In: LUX, V.; WEIGEL, S. Empathy: Epistemic problems and Cultural- Historical perspectives of a Cross-disciplinary Concept. Brunaby: British Columbia, Canada, 2017. ISBN 978-1-137-51298-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51299-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51299-4

LEVENSON, R. W.; RUEF, A. M. Empathy: A physiological substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, [S. I.], v. 63, n. 2, p. 234-246, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.234

LEVY, J.; BADER, O. Graded Empathy: A Neuro-Phenomenological Hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychiatry, [S. I.], v. 11, 2020. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyt.2020.554848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.554848

LIPPS, T. Komik und Humor: Eine psychologisch-ästhetische Untersuchung. Hamburg, Germany: L Voss, 1898.

LUMMA, A.; HACKERT, B.; WEGER, U. Insights from the inside of empathy: Investigating the experiential dimension of empathy through introspection. Philosophical Psychology, [S. I.], v. 33, n. 1, p. 64-85, 2020. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2019.1683727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2019.1683727

MAIN, A.; KHO, C. A relational framework for integrating the study of empathy in children and adults. Emotion Review, [S. I.], v. 12, n. 4, p. 280-290, 2020. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F1754073919868755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919868755

MATTHEWS, G. A.; TYE, K. M. Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, New York, v. 1457, n. 1, p. 5, 2019. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fnyas.14016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14016

MEHLING, W. E. et al. The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PloS one, San Francisco, v. 7, n. 11, p. 1-22, 2012. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048230

MELTZOFF, A. N.; MOORE, M. K. Explaining facial imitation: A theoretical model. Infant and child development, [S. I.], v. 6, n. 3‐4, p. 179-192, 1997. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0917(199709/12)6:3/4%-3C179::AID-EDP157%3E3.0.CO;2-R. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0917(199709/12)6:3/4<179::AID-EDP157>3.0.CO;2-R

MERLEAU-PONTY, M. The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1968.

MERLEAU-PONTY, M. Le visible et L’invisible. Paris: Gallimard, 1977.

NUMMENMAA, L. et al. Maps of subjective feeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, [S. I.], v. 115, n. 37, p. 9198-9203, 2018. https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807390115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1807390115

PAUL, L. A. First personal modes of presentation and the structure of empathy. Inquiry, [S. I.], v. 60, n. 3, p. 189-207, 2017. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1261991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1261991

RATCLIFFE, M. The phenomenology of depression and the nature of empathy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, [S. I.], v. 17, n. 2, p. 269-280, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-013-9499-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-013-9499-8

RIZZOLATTI G.; CRAIGHERO L. Mirror neuron: a neurological approach to empathy. In: CHANGEUX, JP. et al. (ed.). Neurobiology of Human Values. Research and Perspectives in Neurosciences. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29803-7_9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29803-7_9

ROCKWELL, T. Dynamic empathy: A new formulation for the simulation theory of mind reading. Cognitive Systems Research, [S. I.], v. 9, n. 1-2, p. 52-63, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.07.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.07.004

ROSA, H. Resonance: A sociology of our relationship to the world. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019. 450 p.

RYAN JR, K. J.; GALLAGHER, S. Between ecological psychology and enactivism: is there resonance? Frontiers in Psychology, [S. I.], v. 11, p. 1147, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01147

SANTOS, R. O quiasma do mundo: a questão da alteridade em Merleau-Ponty. Curitiba: CRV, 2017. 162 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.24824/978854441926.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24824/978854441926.7

SCHANDRY, R.; BESTLER, M. The association between parameters of cardiovascular function and heartbeat perception. In: VAITL, D.; SCHANDRY, R. (ed.). From the heart to the brain: The psychophysiology of circulation-brain interaction. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1995. p. 223–250.

SCHELER, M. The Nature of Sympathy. Routledge: New York, 2008.

SCHUTZ, A. Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1967.

SHIELDS, S. A.; MALLORY, M. E.; SIMON, A. The body awareness questionnaire: reliability and validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, [S. I.], v. 53, n. 4, p. 802-815, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5304_16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5304_16

SINGER, T.; KLIMECKI, O. Empathy and compassion. Current Biology, [S. I.], v. 24, n. 18, p. 875-878, 2014. ISSN 0960-9822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054

SPAULDING, S. Cognitive Empathy. In: MAIBON, H. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy. London: Routledge, 2019.

STEIN, E. On the Problem of Empathy. Washington: ICS Publications, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1051-5

STEIN, E. Il problema dell’Empatia. Edizioni Studium. Roma, 2003.

STERLEY, TL.; BAINS, J. S. Social communication of affective states. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, [S. I.], v. 68, p. 44-51, 2021.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.12.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.12.007

STUEBER, K. Empathy. In: LAFOLLETTE, H. (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee736

SUVILEHTO, J. T.; RENVALL, V.; NUMMENMAA, L. Relationship-specific encoding of social touch in somatosensory and insular cortices. Neuroscience, [S. I.], v. 464, p. 105-116, 2021. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.09.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.09.015

SVENAEUS, F. Depression and the Self Bodily Resonance and Attuned Being-in-the-World. Journal of Consciousness Studies, [S. I.], v. 20, n. 7-8, p. 15-32, 2013.

SZANTO, T.; MORAN, D. Phenomenological discoveries concerning the ‘We’: Mapping the terrain. In: SZANTO, T.; MORAN, D. (ed.). The phenomenology of Sociality. London: Routledge, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315688268-1

TARRICONE, P. The taxonomy of metacognition. Psychology Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203830529

THOMPSON, E. Empathy and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, [S. I.], v. 8, n. 5, p. 1-32, 2001.

VAN RHYN, B.; BARWICK, A.; DONELLY, M. Embodiment as an instrument for empathy in social work. Australian Social Work, v. 74, n. 2, p. 146-158, 2021. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2020.1839112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2020.1839112

WHARNE, S., Empathy in phenomenological research: Employing Edith Stein’s account of empathy as a practical and ethical guide. Methods in Psychology, [S. I.], v. 5, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100053

WISPÉ, L. History of the concept of empathy. In: EISENBERG, N.; STRAYER, J. (ed.). Cambridge studies in social and emotional development. Empathy and its development. Cambridge University Press, 1987. p. 17-37.

ZAHAVI, D. Empathy, Embodiment and Interpersonal Understanding: From Lipps to Schutz. Inquiry, [S. I.], v. 53, n. 3, p. 285-306, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00201741003784663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201741003784663

ZAHAVI, D. Empathy and direct social perception: A phenomenological proposal. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, [S. I.], v. 2, n. 3, p. 541-558, 2011. http://dx.doi.org//10.1007/s13164-011-0070-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-011-0070-3

ZAHN-WAXLER, C.; ROBINSON, J. L.; EMDE, R. N. The development of empathy in twins. Developmental Psychology, [S. I.], v. 28, n. 6, p. 1038-1047, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.6.1038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.6.1038

Published

2022-05-23

How to Cite

Castro, G. J. M. de. (2022). Phenomenological empathy: Scenarios and possibilities. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 67(1), e41354. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2022.1.41354

Issue

Section

Philosophy & Interdisciplinarity