Virginia Held’s propose of defense of the prevalence of care on human rights

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2019.3.34634

Keywords:

Human Rights. Care. Interdependence.

Abstract

Virginia Held proposes to us in her chapter “Care and Human Rights,” from the
Philosophical Foundation of Human Rights (2015), that we use the ethical perspective of care to think and effect the demands we choose to deal with the language of human rights, traditionally the issues of justice. While recognizing the importance of human rights in mobilizing forces at both the international and national levels, in terms of the enforcement of laws and policies addressing problems that seriously affect the populations of countries, Held highlights that thousands of people still escape this reach, including children, who die in alarming numbers due to malnutrition or treatable diseases. It also emphasizes that our conception of human rights is inherited from an individualistic and violent vision of the liberal tradition, in which the lonely
subject will confront the forces of the world alone, including nature and other people. An ethic of care, because of its characteristic of recognizing our necessary situation of vulnerability and interdependence, is proposed as a more efficient alternative, because it focuses on the relationship between caregiver and care, seeking to move away from traditional abstractions such as those it is understood to be the other ethical approaches like kantian and utilitarian, still tributaries of that liberal tradition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

José Elielton Sousa, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brasil.

Doutor em Filosofia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS, Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil. Professor do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia do Centro de Ciências Humanas e Letras da Universidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Teresina (PI), Brasil.

Nayara Barros de Sousa, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.

Doutoranda em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina UFSC, Florianópolis (SC), Brasil.

References

BOBBIO, Norberto. A era dos direitos. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2004.

CANTO-SPERBER, M. Que devo fazer? A filosofia moral. Tradução de Benno Dischinger. São Leopoldo-RS: Editora UNISINOS, 2004.

HELD, Virginia. Care and human rights. In: CRUFT, Rowan; LIAO, S. Matthew; RENZO, Massimo. Philosophical foundations of human rights. New York: Oxford, 2015. p. 624-641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688623.003.0036

HELD, Virginia. The ethics of care: personal, political, and global. New York: Oxford, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195180992.001.0001

MacINTYRE, Alasdair. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company, 1999.

ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS (ONU). Objetivos do milênio. Disponível em<http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/childhealth.shtml>. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2017.

POGGE, Thomas. Are we violating the human rights of the world’s poor? Yale human rights and development law journal, Yale, v. 14, n. 2, 2011.

RAWLS, J. Political Liberalism. New York. Columbia University Press, 2005.

RAZ, Joseph. Human rights without foudantions. New York: Oxford, 2010. Disponível em: <http://ssrn.com/abstract=999874>. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2017.

ROBINSON, Fiona. Globalizing Care: ethics, feminist theory and international relations. Alternatives, nº 22, v. 1, p. 113-133, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030437549702200105

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

Sousa, J. E., & de Sousa, N. B. (2019). Virginia Held’s propose of defense of the prevalence of care on human rights. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 64(3), e34634. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2019.3.34634

Issue

Section

Philosophy & Interdisciplinarity