Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Legal Science

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2019.3.33607

Keywords:

Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Law. Legal Science. Legal dogmatics

Abstract

The so-called legal dogmatics is a field of knowledge about the law focused on issues such as the definition of the meaning and scope of legal norms, the solution of conflicts between norms and the confrontation of legal loopholes – be they real or apparent. Brazilian jurists often consider this kind of knowledge to be scientific, and refer to it as Legal Science. This is done without much reflection, as if the scientific character of legal dogmatics were a given or a truism. The concept of science, in turn, is the main object of a discipline of philosophical knowledge: the Philosophy of Science. In this article, I intend to understand what the Philosophy of Science is, what it usually comprises, and whether and how it applies to legal dogmatics. In order to achieve that, I carried out theoretical and bibliographical research whose starting point resided in the bibliographic cutting made by the course “Philosophy of Science” of the platform Saylor Academy. Different sources were examined, systematized and compared with the intention of identifying the most consistent position. The article presents the following main results: the identification of the Philosophy of Science as a discipline distinct from the empirical or observational disciplines on Science; the confrontation of this discipline with the criticism that denounces its supposed uselessness; the defense of the relevance of the Philosophy of Science and its application to Law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Henrique Napoleão Alves, Faculdade Milton Campos, Nova Lima, MG, Brasil.

Doutor em Direito pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). Pós-doutor em Direito, Democracia e Direitos Humanos pela Universidade de Coimbra. Professor universitário – Faculdade de Direito Milton Campos (MG). Advogado e Consultor Jurídico da Organização dos Estados Americanos (OEA) na Comissão Interamericana de Direitos Humanos (CIDH).

References

ALDER, Mike. Newton’s Flaming Laser Sword. Philosophy Now, Issue 46, 2004. Disponível em: https://philosophynow.org/issues/46/Newtons_Flaming_Laser_Sword. Acesso em: 05 ago. 2015.

BONAVIDES, Paulo. Curso de Direito Constitucional. 15 ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2004.

BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Embargos de Divergência em Recurso Especial 841587, Relator Ministro Benedito Gonçalves, Brasília, Diário da Justiça Eletrônico, 24 de março de 2010.

BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Recurso Especial 931727, Relator Ministro Luiz Fux, Brasília, Diário da Justiça Eletrônico, 14 de setembro de 2009.

BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 447, Relator Ministro Octavio Gallotti, Brasília, Diário da Justiça, 5 de março de 1993.

BREWER, William F.; LAMBERT, Bruce L. The Theory-Ladenness of Observation and the Theory-Ladenness of the Rest of the Scientific Process. Philosophy of Science, v.68, p.176-186, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/392907

CHALMERS, Alan Francis. O que é ciência, afinal? [What is this thing called science?]. Trad. Raul Filker. São Paulo: Ed. Brasiliense, 1993[1981].

DWORKIN, Ronald. Law’s Empire. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1986.

EXISTENTIAL COMICS. Sem título. Twitter (@existentialcoms), 5 Ago. 2015. Disponível em: https://twitter.com/existentialcoms. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2015.

HOLDEN, John C.; SIMANEK, Donald E. Science Askew: A Light-Hearted Look at the Scientific World. Philadelphia: Institute of Physics Publishing, 2002.

HOYNINGEN-HUENE, Paul. “Why Is Football So Fascinating?”. In: Ted Richards (ed.). Soccer and Philosophy: beautiful thoughts on the beautiful game. Chicago: Open Court, 2010.

IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY. Lyle Zynda’s “Introduction to the Philosophy of Science” – Lecture 1 – Introduction. Department of Sociology – Iowa State University, 1994. Disponível em: <http://www.soc.iastate.edu/sapp/phil_sci_lecture01.html>. Acesso em: 05 ago. 2015.

KEYSAR, B.; HAYAKAWA, S.; & AN, S. The Foreign-Language Effect: Thinking in a Foreign Tongue Reduces Decision Biases. Psychological Science, v.23 (6), p.661-668, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611432178

LOPES, Mônica Sette. O Direito em movimento: a linguagem da realidade e as falhas de comunicação. Revista TST, v.70, n.2, p.72-87, jul./dez. 2004a.

LOPES, Mônica Sette. Uma charada: a ciência, os métodos, a lei e o conflito. Revista do Tribunal Regional do Trabalho da 3ª Região, v.40, n.70, p.185-212, jul./dez. 2004b.

MARTINS, Glayson Pereira. “Ceticismo epistemológico em Kirchmann”. In: LOPES, Mônica Sette (org.). O Direito e a ciência: tempo e métodos. Belo Horizonte: Movimento Editorial da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG, 2006.

NOË, Alva. A Little Philosophy Is A Dangerous Thing. NPR – 13.7: cosmos & culture, 4 fev. 2011. Disponível em: <http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2011/02/04/133363055/a-little-philosophy-is-a-dangerous-thing>. Acesso em: 05 ago. 2015.

POPPER, Karl. The Logic of Scientific Discovery [Logik der Forschung]. New York: Routledge, 2005 [1935].

POPPER, Karl. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Basic Books, 1962.

SAYLOR ACADEMY. In: Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Florida: Wikimedia Foundation, 2019. Disponível em: < https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saylor_Academy >. Acesso em: 26 fev. 2019.

SALDANHA, Elza Roxane Álvares. Kirchmann e a negação do caráter científico da ciência do direito. Revista de Informação Legislativa, a.27, n.108, p.271-284, out./dez. 1990.

SEARLE, John. Mind, Language and Society. New York: Basic Books, 1999.

VEGA, Jesús. Las calificaciones del saber jurídico y la pretensión de racionalidad del derecho. DOXA – Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, n. 32, p. 375-414, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA2009.32.16

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

Napoleão Alves, H. (2019). Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Legal Science. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 64(3), e33607. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2019.3.33607