The Formation of Habits and the Origin of Laws in the Cambridge Conference VII, by Ch. S. Peirce

Authors

  • Ivo Assad Ibri Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2015.3.20902

Keywords:

Peirce. Habit. Conservation of Energy. Chance. Origin of Laws of Nature.

Abstract

This article aims a reflection on the arguments proposed by Charles Sanders Peirce in his well-known Cambridge Conference VII, issued in 1898, under the title “Habit”, in which he justifies his position about how it would be possible to explain the origin of the universe through a philosophy with a genetic character. This explanation takes, within his complex architectural system of thought, the tendency of acquiring habits as the axial explanatory principle of the origin of Laws of Nature. Peirce takes such a principle as the basis on which it would be possible to claim an affinity between mind and matter.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ivo Assad Ibri, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo

Possui graduação em Engenharia Civil pela Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo (1972), mestrado em Filosofia pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (1986) e doutorado em Filosofia pela Universidade de São Paulo (1994). Realizou pesquisa de pós-doutorado nos anos de 2004 e 2005 na Universidade de Indiana, Estados Unidos, com bolsa tipo fellowship concedida pelo Institute for Advanced Study daquela universidade.

References

ESPOSITO, Joseph. Evolutionary Metaphysics. The Development of Peirce’s Theory of Categories. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1980.

HAUSMAN, Carl R. Charles S. Peirce’s Evolutionary Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570773

IBRI, Ivo Assad. Kósmos Noetós: a arquitetura metafísica de Charles S. Peirce. São Paulo: Perspectiva – Hólon, 1992. Obra revista e atualizada, reeditada in: São Paulo: Editora Paulus, 2015.

______. Reflections on a Poetic Ground in Peirce’s Philosophy. In: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 45:3 (2009), p. 273-307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/tra.2009.45.3.273

______. The Continuity of Life: On Peirce’s Objective Idealism. In: ROMANINI, Vinicius and FERNÁNDES, Eliseo (eds.). Peirce and Biosemiotics: A Guess at the Riddle of Life. Dordrecht – Heidelberg – New York – London: Springer, 2014, p. 33-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7732-3_3

______. The Heuristic Exclusivity of Abduction in Peirce’s Philosophy. In: LEO, Rossella Fabbrichesi and MARIETTI, Susana (eds.). Semiotics and Philosophy in C. S. Peirce. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2006, p. 90-112.

KANT, Imannuel. The Critique of Pure Reason. Edited [and translated] by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

MARGOLIS, Joseph. Rethinking Peirce’s Fallibilism. In: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 43:2 (2007), p. 229-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/TRA.2007.43.2.229

MAYORGA, Rosa M. From Realism to “Realicism”. The Metaphysics of Charles Sanders Peirce. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007.

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. Reasoning and the Logic of Things. The Cambridge Conferences of 1898. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992.

______. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Edited by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and Arthur W. Burks. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1931-1935 e 1958. 8 v.

SCHELLING, F. W. J. Ideas for a Philosophy of Nature. Translation by Errol E. Harris and P. Heath. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.

Published

2016-06-13

How to Cite

Ibri, I. A. (2016). The Formation of Habits and the Origin of Laws in the Cambridge Conference VII, by Ch. S. Peirce. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 60(3), 619–630. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2015.3.20902

Issue

Section

Debating Contemporary Epistemology