Writing: weaving and carving the text

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2019.2.32354

Keywords:

Writing Writing process. Reformulation. Operations. Choice.

Abstract

The words of a text are not predetermined. The writer makes choices among the possibilities offered by the language. Linguistic development brings with it the increase of lexical, syntactic, semantic, and textual resources. Does this development draw a more direct path to the text, or does it activate a higher level of choices and decisions during writing? The current study analysed the evolution of the components of formulation and reformulation in the writing process of students attending Portuguese basic education. The data comes from the interaction between students of different years (2nd to 8th), organized in small groups, to write a text collaboratively. The analysis focused on the formulation/reformulation operations carried out during text construction. The results show an expansion of the possibilities considered, from the initial school years to the more advanced levels. This movement implies the need to reinforce the ability to rewrite and reformulate, in learning to write.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luís Barbeiro, Escola Superior de Educação e Ciências Sociais, Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Leiria

Doutor em Educação, Metodologia de Ensino do Português e agregado em Ciências da Educação – Literacias e Ensino do Português, pela Universidade do Minho, Portugal. Escola Superior de Educação e Ciências Sociais (ESECS). Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.

References

ALAMARGOT, Denis; FAYOL, Michel. Modelling the development of written composition. In: BEARD, Roger; MYHILL, Debra; RILEY, Jenny; NYSTRAND, Martin (org.). Handbook of Writing Development. London: Sage, 2009. p. 23-47. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021069.n3

BARBEIRO, Luís. Escrita: Construir a aprendizagem. Braga: Universidade do Minho, 2003.

BARBEIRO, Luís. Os alunos e a expressão escrita. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 1999.

BARBEIRO, Luís. Profundidade do processo de escrita. Educação & Comunicação, São Paulo, v. 5, p. 64-76, 2001.

BARBEIRO, Luís. What Happens when I Write? Pupils’ Writing about Writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 7, p. 813-834, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9226-2

BARTHES, Roland. Image-Music-Text. From work to text. London: Fontana, 1977. p. 155-164.

BEREITER, Carl, Scardamalia, Marlene. The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1987.

BERNINGER, Virginia W.; SWANSON, H. Lee, Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In: BUTTERFIELD, Earl C.; CARLSON, Jerry (org.). Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing. London: JAI Press, 1994, p. 57-81.

BRITTON, James. Shaping at the point of the utterance. In: YOUNG, Richard; LIU, Yameng (org.). Landmark essays on rhetorical invention in writing. New York: Routledge, 1994. p. 147-152.

CALIL, Eduardo. O sentido das palavras e como eles se relacionam com o texto em curso: estudo sobre comentários semânticos feitos por uma díade de alunas de 7 anos de idade. Alfa, Araraquara, v. 60, n. 3, p. 531-555, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5794-1612-4

CHENOWETH, N. Ann, HAYES, John Richard. The Inner Voice in Writing. Written Communication, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 1, p. 99-118, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303253572

GARCIA-DEBANC, Claudine. Intérêts des modèles du processus rédactionnel pour une pédagogie de l’écriture. Pratiques, Metz, v. 49, p. 29-56, 1986. https://doi.org/10.3406/prati.1986.2449

HAYES, John Richard. A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In: LEVY, C. M.; RANDALL, S. (org.). The science of writing: theories, methods, individual differences, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996, p. 1-27.

HAYES, John Richard. Kinds of knowledge-telling: Modeling early writing development. Journal of Writing Research, Antwerpen, v. 3, n. 2, 73-92, 2011. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2011.03.02.1

HAYES, John Richard. Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, [s. l.], v. 29, n. 3, p. 369-388, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260

HAYES, John Richard; FLOWER, Linda. Identifying the organization of writing processes. In: GREGG, L. W.; STEINBERG, E. R. (org.). Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980. p. 3-30.

HYLAND, Ken. Methods and methodologies in second language writing research. System, v. 59, p. 116-125, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.002

KELLOGG, Ronald. Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, Antwerpen, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1–26, 2008. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1

LOWRY, Paul Benjamin, CURTIS, Aaron, LOWRY, Michelle René. Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, [s. l.], v. 41, n.1, p. 66-99, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943603259363

MORÔCO, João. Análise estatística com o SPSS Statistics. 5. ed. Pero Pinheiro: Report Number, 2011.

O’DONNELL, Michael. A dynamic view of choice in writing: Composition as text evolution. In: FONTAINE, Lise; BARTLETT, Tom, O’GRADY, Gerard (org.) Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, p. 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583077.016

PERL, Sondra, EGENDORF, Arthur (1979). The process of creative discovery: Theory, research, and implications for teaching. In: McQUADE, Donald (org.). Linguistics, stylistics, and the teaching of composition. University of Akron: Studies in Contemporary Language, 1979, p. 121-127.

PINTO, Maria da Graça Castro. A escrita académica: um jogo de forças entre a geração de ideias e a sua concretização. Signos, Santa Cruz, v. 41, p. 53-71, 2016. https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v1i1.7325

ROSE, David, MARTIN, James Robert. Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox, 2012.

SANTANA, Inácia. A aprendizagem da escrita: Estudo sobre a revisão cooperada de texto. Porto: Porto Editora, 2007.

SPINILLO, Alina Galvão. “Por que você alterou isso aqui?” As razões que as crianças adotam quando fazem alterações ao revisar seus textos. Letras de Hoje, Porto Alegre, v. 50, n. 1, p. 32-39, 2015. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2015.1.18348

STORCH, Neomy. Collaborative Writing. Product, Process, and Students’ Reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, [s. l.], v. 14, p. 153-173, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002

STURM, Afra. Observing writing processes of struggling adult writers with collaborative writing. Journal of Writing Research, Antwerpen, v. 8, n. 2, 301-344, 2016. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2016.08.02.05

Published

2019-11-06

How to Cite

Barbeiro, L. (2019). Writing: weaving and carving the text. Letras De Hoje, 54(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2019.2.32354

Issue

Section

Processamento da decodificação e da compreensão da leitura: