Academic literacy in English and in Portuguese: a estudy of evaluatives actividades proceeding of undergraduate disciplines in an American institution and in a Brazilian federal one
Keywords:academic literacy, genres, higher education 3, Brazilian institution, American institution.
The paper analyses how academic literacy is promoted in academic writing assignments using genres. The context of the study is that of undergraduate disciplines in the field of Biological Sciences. The disciplines take place in an American institution and in a Brazilian federal one. The data were drawn from pedagogical and evaluative documents that were analysed by content analysis. The data collected from the American institution showed that genres are used as a vehicle to integrate knowledge, and also to
demonstrate information. Relating to national context, genres are used to demonstrate information. It can be concluded that, in the American institution, academic literacy occurs in an ideological way in the disciplines, since writing is developed making use of genres that are explored as a social practice. Nevertheless, in the Brazilian institution, academic literacy is developed in an autonomous way, due to the absence of the teaching of writing in the disciplines, probably because it is considered that
students already know how to write. In brief, this investigation intends to clarify academic literacy practices in different academic contexts in order to bring insight to other researchers and practitioners on how this issue has been dealt with, and what are the strengths and the weaknesses of such practices.
Bailey, C. 2012. Negotiating writing – Challenges of the first written assignement at a UK university. In: Sovic, S. & Blythman, M. (eds.). International Students negotiating Higher Education: Critical perspectives. p. 173-189.
Bakhtin, M. 1997. Estética da criação verbal. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. Bardin, L. 2009. Análise de Conteúdo. Lisboa, Portugal: Edições 70.
Bazerman, C. 1988. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bazerman, C. 2005. Gêneros textuais, tipificação e interação. Org. Ângela P. Dionísio e Judith C. Hoffnagel. Trad. Judith C. Hoffnagel. São Paulo: Cortez. Besnier, N. & Street, B. 1994. Aspects of Literacy. In: Encyclopedia of Anthropology.Ed. T. Ingold.
Bronckart, J. P. 1997. Atividade de linguagem, textos e discursos: por um interacionismo sócio-discursivo. Trad. Anna Raquel Machado e Péricles Cunha. São Paulo: EDUC, 2003.
Dorigon, T. 2015. O programa Idiomas sem fronteiras analisado a partir do ciclo de políticas. In: BELT – Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, Porto Alegre, 6(sp.n.,suppl.), s4-s20. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 25 jun. 16.
Emig, J. 1971. The composing processes of 12th graders. Urbana, Il: NCTE.
Ferreira, M. M. 2007. Theoretical and empirical views of the concept of genre in a writing course. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress.p. 1021-1051.
Ferreira, M. M. 2011. O livro didático importado de inglês e o ensino da escrita. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada (UNICAMP), 50(1), p. 75-95.
Ferreira, M. M. A. 2015. A promoção do letramento acadêmico em Inglês por meio do ensino desenvolvimental: contribuições da teoria histórico cultural. Tese de Livre Docência. Universidade de São Paulo: SP. Flower, L. & ayes, J. 1977. Problem solving strategies and the writing process. College English, 39, p. 365-387.
______. 1980. The cognition of discovery: defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, p. 21-32.
______. 1981. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, p. 365-387.
Freedman, A. & Medway, P. (orgs). 1994. Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis. p. 191-210.
Gee, James P. 1990. Social Linguistics and Literacy: Ideology in Discourses. London: Falmer Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
Hyland, K. 2002. Specificity revisited: how far should we go? English for Specific Purposes 21, p. 385-395.
Hyland, K. 2006. English for Academic purposes: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge. Lea, M. R. & Street, B. 1998. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), p. 157-172.
Marcuschi, L. A. 2008. Produção textual, análise de gêneros e compreensão. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial. Martin, J. 1991. Intrinsic functionality: implications for contextual theory. Social Semiotics, 1(1), p. 99-162.
______. 1993. Genre and literacy: modeling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, p. 141-172.
Miller, C. R. 1984. Genre as social action. Quaterly journal of speech, 70(2), p. 151-176.
Miller, C. R. 1994. Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In: A. Freedman & P. Medway (eds.). Genre and the new rhetoric (p. 67-78). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Nambiar, R. M. & Ibrahim, N. 2013. Exploring the academic literacy socialization of mainland china undergraduates in a Malaysian tertiary institution. Int. Educ. Stud., 6, p. 35-44.
Riazi, Mehdi. 2016. Comparing writing performance in TOEFL-iBT and academic assignments: An exploration of textual features. Assessing Writing, 28, p. 15-27. 10.1016/j.asw.2016.02.001
Russell, D. R. 1997. Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), p. 504-554.
Russell, D., Lea, M., Parker, J., Street, B., & Donahue, T. 2009. Exploring notions of genre in ‘academic literacies’ and ‘writing in the disciplines’: approaches across countries and contexts. In: Bazerman, Charles; Bonini, Adair; Figueiredo, Débora (ed.). Genre in a Changing World. Perspectives on Writing. Fort Collins, Colorado: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. http://wac.colostate.edu/books/genre/
Sarmento, S. & Kirsch, W. 2015. Inglês Sem Fronteiras: Uma Mirada ao Contexto de Prática pelo Prisma da Formação de Professores. Ilha do Desterro, 68(1), p. 47-59. 10.5007/2175-8026.2015v68n1p47
Schneuwly, B. et al. 2004. Gêneros Orais e Escritos na Escola. Trad. Roxane Rojo e Glaís S. Cordeiro. Campinas: Mercado de Letras.
Squire, J. R. & Applebee, R. K. 1969. Teaching English in the United Kingdom. Champaign, Ill: NCTE. Street, B. 1984. Literacy in theory and in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
______. (ed.). 2001. Literacy and Development: Ethnographic Perspectives. London: Routledge.
______. 2006. Autonomous and Ideological Models of Literacy: Approaches from New Literacy Studies. Media Anthropology Network.
Swales, J. M. 1990. Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
______. 2004. Research Genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vial, A. P. S. 2014. O uso do livro didático no programa Inglês sem fronteiras da Universidade federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Monografia. 110 p.
Zamel, V. 1976. Teaching composition in the ESL classroom: what we can learn from research in the teaching of English. TESOL Quaterly, 10(1), p. 67-76.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2018 BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.