Universal Adhesive Systems in Class II Amalgam Restorations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6523.2016.3.21397Keywords:
Adhesives, Universal adhesive, Amalgams, Microleakage, Class IIAbstract
Objective: to assess the effectiveness of adhesive system in reducing microleakage in Class II amalgam restorations.
Methods: The teeth were divided randomly into 3 equal groups: Group I was the control experiment (Copal Vanish); Group II: single Bond Universal 3M-ESPE (with and without acid – 37%); and Group III: All Bond Universal – BISCO (with and without acid – 37%), after the amalgam was condensed. The root apices were then sealed with acrylic resin and stored for 24 hours in 100% humidity. After storage, the specimens were subjected to 500 cycles of thermocycling (5°C and 55°C). The teeth were isolated with cosmetic nail polish and were immersed in 0.5 basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours. The teeth then were sectioned with a diamond disc and observed under a stereomicroscope. Microleakage was assessed using a 0-3 scale of dye penetration. The data was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05).
Results: The microleakage scores revealed less leakage in the experimental groups than in the control group. The microleakage for the adhesives without acid conditioning was reduced, although no statistical significance was recorded (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The immediate adhesive material acted effectively as a barrier for microleakage when it was applied without acid.
References
De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005a, 84(2): 118-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204
Mali P, Deshpande S, Singh A. Microleakage of restorative materials: an
in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006; 24: 15-8. https://doi.
org/10.4103/0970-4388.22828
Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Kaga M, Oguchi H. in vitro degradation of resin-dentin bonds analyzed by microtensile bond test, scanning and transmission eléctron microscopy. Biomaterials 2003a,24(21):3795-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00262-X
Guiraldo RD, Consani S, Santos P H, Sinhoreti M A C, Correr Sobrinho L. Adaptação marginal em restaurações de amálgama de prata associada às técnicas adesivas. Rev Odont Ara 2007,.28 (1):39-43.
Pinto MB. Microleakage in silver amalgam restorations under the influence of condensation forms and use of intermediate materials in marginal interface 2001. 125f. (Doctorate in Dentistry) - Postgraduate Course in Dentistry, Dental Materials, Campinas, Piracicaba.
Setcos JC, Staninec M, Wilson NH. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations. J Adhes Dent 1999;
:323-31.
Mahler DB, Engle JH. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:43-9. https://doi. org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0018
Ben-Amar A, Nordenberg D, Liberman R, Fischer J, Gorfil C. The control of marginal microleakage in amalgam restorations using a dentin adhesive: a pilot study. Dent Mater 1987;3:94-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80013-1
Staninec M, Holt M. Bonding of amalgam to tooth structure: tensile adhesion and microleakage tests. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:397-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90030-3
Turner EW, St. Germain HA, Meiers JC. Microleakage of dentin-amalgam bonding agents. Am J Dent 1995;8:191-6.
Ziskind D, Venezia E,Kreisman I, Mass E. Amalgam type, adhesive system, and storage period as influencing factors on microleakage of amalgam restorations. J Prost Dent 2003, 90(3):2 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00421-9
Amin VM. Comparative study of the sealingefficacy of various bondingsystems to Class V dental amalgam restorations. Inter J Adhes Adhes 2006, 26: 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.002
Chen L, Suh B. New one-bottle self-etch adhesive is compatible with selfcure materials. Presented at: American Association for Dental Research Annual Meeting; March 24, 2012; Tampa, Florida.
Suh BI. Universal Adhesives: The Evolution of Adhesive Solutions Continues. COMPENDIUM 2014, 35(4):278.
McCURDY Jr. C, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Rhodes BF. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro microleakage of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1974, 88: 592-602. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1974.0107
Ben-Amar A, Cardash HS, Judes H. The sealing of the tooth/amalgam interface by corrosion products. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:101-4.
Brannstrom, M. Dentin and pulp in restorative dentistry. Wolfe Medical Publication Ltd, Castelnuovo, Italia; 1982:70
Li H, Burrow MF & Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mat 2000, 16(1) 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109- 5641(99)00085-8
Reis A, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Gones OM, Patzlaff R, Loguercio AD. Impact of adhesive application to wet and dry dentin on long-term resin-dentin bond strengths. Oper Dent 2007; 32(4):380-7. https://doi. org/10.2341/06-107
Cenci MS, Piva E, Potrich F, Formolo E, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials. Braz Dent J 2004;15:13-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103- 64402004000100003
Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000;79:1385-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790060601
Moraes RR, Lima FG, Bueno M, Demarco FF. Storage time influence on the sealing of amalgam restorations using different liners.. Rev Odontol UNESP 2005, 34(3):135-40.
Moore DS, Johnson WW, Kaplan I. A comparison of amalgam microleakage with a 4-META liner and copal varnish. Int J Prosthodont 1995, 8: 461-6.
Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent, in press, 2012b.
Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, Osaka A, Meerbeek BV. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012; 91(4):376-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512437375
Oliveira FS; Silva SMB; Bijella MFTB, Lima JEO. In vitro evaluation of the marginal microleakage of class II amalgam restoration associated with dentin adhesive. Rev Odontol UNESP 1999, 13(3): 263-8. https://doi. org/10.1590/s0103-06631999000300010
Junior Pereira ES, Bijella MFTB, Silva SMB, Vono BG. In vitro evaluation of marginal microleakage of glass II bonded amalgam restorations using a dentin adhesive and a glass ionomer cement. Rev Odontol UNESP 1999, 13(2): 103-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-06631999000200002
Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture: Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 481-508.
Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Prati C, Tay FR. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 2005;26(9):1035-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.003
do Amaral RC, Stanislawczuk R, Zander-Grande C, Gagler D, Reis A,
Loguercio AD. Bond strength and quality of the hybrid layer of onestep self-etch adhesives applied with agitation on dentin. Oper Dent 2010;35(2):211-9. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-198-L
Loguercio AD, Stanislawczuk R, Mena-Serrano A, Reis A. Effect of 3-year water storage on the performance of one-step self-etch adhesives applied actively on dentine. J Dent 2011a;39(8):578-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.06.005
Reis AF, Oliveira MT, Giannini M, De Goes MF, Rueggeberg FA. The effect of organic solvents on one-bottle adhesives' bond strength to enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 2003;28(6):700-6.
Barbosa JB, Giro EMA, Santos Pinto LAM. Marginal leakage of amalgam restorations: effect of pretreatment of the cavity walls with conventional varnish and fluoride. Rev Odontol UNESP 1997, 26(2): 433-44.
Pucci CR, Giachetti NJ, Araújo MAX. In vitro microleakage of amalgam. Rev Odontol UNESP 1998, 27(2):459-72.
Sansvieiro A, Neto ALM, Matumoto MSS, Blas R. Microleakage in restorations of silver amalgam, lined with simple and modified varnish – Study in vitro. Conscientia e saúde. Rev Cient UNINOVE 2003, 2(002): 43-9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT
The submission of originals to Odonto Ciência implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Odonto Ciência as the site of original publication.
CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE
As this journal is open access, the articles are allowed free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source.
According to the type of Creative Commons License (CC-BY 4.0) adopted by Odonto Ciência, the user must respect the requirements below.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
However, only under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests Odonto Ciência endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
For more details on the Creative Commons license, please follow the link in the footer of this website.
