Familism, Social Reproduction and Social Protection Models in the World
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1677-9509.2025.1.45541Keywords:
Social Protection, Family, Capitalism.Abstract
This article aims to reflect on social protection models established in various parts of the world, aiming to understand the relationship they establish with the family and whether the policies offered enable the relief of family burdens and responsibilities. This is bibliographical, qualitative research, analyzed using the content analysis technique. The main results demonstrate the global trend of familism as part of the expanded reproduction strategy of capital, based on local particularities and realities. Therefore, it emphasizes the responsibility for ensuring the social well-being of individuals by their own families, even without the conditions to carry out these duties, given the overload of women, disassembled social policies and profound changes in the world of work.
Downloads
References
BHATTACHARYA, T. O que é a teoria da reprodução social? Revista Outubro, [s. l.], n. 32, 2019.
BJØRNHOLT, M.; STEFANSEN, K. Same but different: Polish and Norwegian parents’ work–family adaptations in Norway. Journal of European Social Policy, Oslo, Noruega, v. 29, n. 2, p. 292-304, 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0958928718758824.
BOROUMAND, K. Lone Motherhood and Welfare Feminism: A Comparative Case Study of Iceland and Denmark, Social Politics. International Studies in Gender, State & Society, [s. l.], v. 29, n. 1, p. 141-163, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab036.
CICCIA, R.; SAINSBURY, D. Gendering welfare state analysis: tensions between care and paid work. European Journal of Politics and Gender, [s. l.], v. 1, n. 1-2, p. 93-109, 2018. Disponível em: https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/ejpg/1/1-2/article-p93.xml. Acesso em: 26 set. 2025.
DOBLYTÈ, S.; TEJERO, A. What, where, and how: drivers of welfare attitudes toward work-family reconciliation policies in South European societies. European Societies, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1746821.
ERMIS-MERT, A. Women at Work and in the Family: A Discussion on Reconciliation Policy Practices. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 1, p. 27-41, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebx014.
ESPING-ANDERSEN, G. Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
ESPING-ANDERSEN, G. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
FRASER, N. After the family wage: gender equity and the welfare state. Political Theory, Alemanha, v. 22, n. 4, p. 591-618, 1994.
FRERICKS, P. Welfare State Policies towards Financial Solidarity between Generations. In: DALY, M.; GILBERT, N.; PFAU-EFFINGER, B.; BESHAROV, D. (ed.). International Handbook of Family Policy: A Life-Course Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
FRERICKS, P.; GURÍN, M.; HÖPPNER, J. Family as a Redistributive Principle of the Welfare State: The Case of Germany. Journal of Social Policy, [s. l.], p. 1-21, 2021.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279421000787.
GOOSSEN, M. The gender gap in welfare state attitudes in Europe: The role of unpaid labour and family policy. Journal of European Social Policy, Campridge University Press, v. 30, n. 4, p. 452-466, 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0958928719899337.
GOUGH, I.; WOODS, G. Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Social Policy in Development Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
HORST, C. H. M. Família, Marxismo e Serviço Social: Desvendando o Invólucro Místico. Tese (Doutorado em Serviço Social) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2018.
HORST, H. M. C.; MIOTO, R. C. T. Família, Política Social e Reprodução Social. Oikos: Família e Sociedade em Debate, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 1, 2024. DOI: 10.31423/oikos.v35i1.19503.
JURCZYK, K.; JENTSCH, B.; SAILER, J.; SCHIER, M. Female-Breadwinner Families in Germany: New Gender Roles? Journal of Family Issues, University Of Edinburgh, UK, v. 40, n. 13, p. 1731-1754, 2019. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X19843149.
KANG, J. Y. Convergence of family policy across welfare regimes (1990 to 2010): Different connotations of family policy expansion. Int J Soc Welfare, [s. l.], n. 28, p. 167-178, 2019. DOI: https://doi org.ez35.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1111/ijsw.12331.
KATZ, C. Vagabond Capitalism and the Necessity of Social Reproduction. Antipode, Departamento de Geografia, Clark University, n. 33, p. 709-728, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00207.
MARSHALL, T. H. Citizenship and social class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950.
MEZZADRI, A.; NEWMAN, S.; STEVANO, S. Feminist global political economies of work and social reproduction. Review of International Political Economy, [s. l.], 2021. DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2021.1957977.
PEREIRA, C. P. Proteção no Capitalismo: crítica a teorias e ideologias conflitantes. São Paulo: Cortez, 2016.
ROUMPAKIS, A. Revisiting Global Welfare Regimes: Gender, (In)formal Employment and Care. Social Policy and Society, University of York, v. 19, n. 4, p. 677-689, 2020. DOI: 10.1017/S1474746420000342.
