Kangaroo method and breastfeeding: an integrative review of national literature

Authors

  • Danielle da Costa Souto UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA
  • Márcia Elisa Jager UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA
  • Amanda Schreiner Pereira UNIVERSIDADE LUTERANA DO BRASIL
  • Ana Cristina Garcia Dias UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1983-652X.2014.1.14519

Keywords:

Kangaroo method, breastfeeding, humanization of assistance, review

Abstract

Objective: It was aimed at getting an overview of national empirical studies that discuss the breastfeeding practice during the implementation of Kangaroo Method (KM).

Materials and Methods: Data comes from an integrative review of national literature. The search was carried out in four national interdisciplinary databases: Virtual Health Library, SciELO, SciELO Brazil and Pepsic. Triple crosses were performed between the descriptors "breastfeeding", "kangaroo method", "breast-feeding", "kangaroo mother" and "humanization of assistance".

Results: In the studies found, some aspects were investigated such as, the experiencing acts, perceptions, and experiences of breastfeeding practice during KM; its relation with weaning; the breastfeeding techniques and the sucking reflex developed during the method, as well as its relation with the breastfeeding in the growth and weight gain of the preterm infant. The main results show: the importance of skin-to-skin contact during the KM and the social representations related to milk and to breastfeeding; the need for developing techniques and food supplementation during the method and attention to the factors that influence on weaning or on the lengthening of breastfeeding.

Conclusion: Among the conclusions, it is highlighted the need for researches which investigate psychological aspects and their variations in the KM, besides the physical and physiologic aspects. Studies about failing mother experiences are scarce, for different reasons, in the breastfeeding practice during the KM. It is observed the need for the dissemination of the hegemonic model of maternity which lies across the female experience.

Author Biographies

Danielle da Costa Souto, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA

Psicóloga. Discente. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria – Programa de Pós Graduação em Psicologia. Santa Maria. Rio Grande do Sul. Brasil. Especialização em Saúde Mental e Atenção Psicossocial pela Universidade Luterana do Brasil. Santa Maria. Rio Grande do Sul. Brasil.

Márcia Elisa Jager, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA

Psicóloga. Discente. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria – Programa de Pós Graduação em Psicologia. Santa Maria. Rio Grande do Sul. Brasil. Especialização em Gestão de Pessoas e Marketing pelo Centro Universitário Franciscano. Santa Maria. Rio Grande do Sul. Brasil.

Amanda Schreiner Pereira, UNIVERSIDADE LUTERANA DO BRASIL

Psicóloga. Docente. Universidade Luterana do Brasil. Santa Maria. Rio Grande do Sul. Brasil. Mestrado em Distúrbios da Comunicação Humana pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria. Santa Maria. Rio Grande do Sul. Brasil.

Ana Cristina Garcia Dias, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA MARIA

Psicóloga. Docente. Universidade Federal de Santa Maria – Programa de Pós Graduação em Psicologia. Santa Maria. Rio Grande do Sul. Brasil. Doutorado em Psicologia Escolar e do Desenvolvimento pela Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo. Brasil.

Published

2014-05-02

Issue

Section

Review Articles