An analysis of John Rawls and the concept of cosmopolitism based on Immanuel Kant’s work
Keywords:
Cosmopolitism, Overlapping consensus, Moral, Politics, Original position.Abstract
The work of John Rawls has its roots in the classical contractualism of Locke, Rousseau and Kant, in order to frame a harsh critique of the utilitarianism that dominated the political philosophy of his time. A deeper understanding of the key aspects of Kant’s work puts itself as a prerequisite to a well-grounded analysis of Ralws’ writings. Matters such as the relation between States, as well as the relation between morals and politics arise from the work of these two authors. Furthermore, the main question is if distributive justice, as presented by Rawls, as well as other of his concepts such as overlapping consensus and original position are adequate to a cosmopolitan worldview.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT
The submission of originals to Direito & Justiça implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Direito & Justiça as the site of original publication.
CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE
As this journal is open access, the articles are allowed free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source.
According to the type of Creative Commons License (CC-BY 4.0) adopted by Direito & Justiça, the user must respect the requirements below.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
However, only under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests Direito & Justiça endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
For more details on the Creative Commons license, please follow the link in the footer of this website.