The trajectory of the sustainable development concept in Brazilian foreign policy

Authors

  • Valentina Menegat Meneguzzi Undergraduate student in International Relations and Master's student in Philosophy through the G+1 Program at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7347-8935

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-5694.2026.1.50280

Keywords:

Sustainable development, Brazilian foreign policy, Environmental diplomacy, Stockholm 72, Rio-92

Abstract

This article examines the trajectory of the sustainable development concept within Brazilian foreign policy, from its genesis in the unrestricted development debate at the Stockholm Conference (1972) to the contemporary challenges of rebuilding the country’s environmental credibility. Through a literature review, the paper articulates three axes: (i) the paradigmatic shift between Stockholm 72 and Rio-92, when Brazilian diplomacy moved from a defensive, sovereigntist posture toward a proactive stance anchored in the concept of sustainable development; (ii) the consolidation and later dismantling of this consensus across subsequent administrations, particularly the rupture promoted by the Bolsonaro government; and (iii) the prospects for Brazil’s reinsertion into global environmental governance and the role of the foreign-policy epistemic community in this process. The article concludes that, over five decades, sustainable development functioned less as a fixed concept than as a flexible signifier, mobilized in distinct, and at times antagonistic, ways to justify domestic interests and project the country’s international image.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Valentina Menegat Meneguzzi, Undergraduate student in International Relations and Master's student in Philosophy through the G+1 Program at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Undergraduate student in International Relations at the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS).

References

Amorim, Celso. 2015. Teerã, Ramalá e Doha: Memórias da Política Externa Ativa e Altiva. Benvirá.

Branco, Luís Gustavo de Almeida, Gabriel Horacio de Jesus Soprijo, e Diego Araújo Azzi. 2021. “Política Externa Brasileira para o Meio Ambiente: Da Formação do Conceito de Desenvolvimento Sustentável à Atuação de Jair Bolsonaro.” O Cosmopolítico 8 (1): 130–147.

Brasil. 2004. Plano de Ação para Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento na Amazônia Legal (PPCDAm). Ministério do Meio Ambiente.

Brasil. 2009. Discurso do Presidente da República, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, na 64ª Assembleia Geral das Nações Unidas. Presidência da República.

Brasil. 2024. Brasil na presidência do G20: prioridades, ações e resultados do mandato brasileiro do fórum das maiores economias globais. Governo Federal.

Brasil. 2025. “Brasil assume a presidência do BRICS em 2025.” BRICS Brasil.

Cervo, Amado Luiz, e Clodoaldo Bueno. 2015. História da Política Exterior do Brasil. Editora Universidade de Brasília.

Estevo, Jefferson dos Santos. 2012. A Política Externa do Presidente Lula da Silva no Âmbito das Mudanças Climáticas (2003-2009). Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) e Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP).

Follador, Marco, Britaldo Silveira Soares-Filho, George Philippidis, Juliana Leroy Davis, Amanda Ribeiro de Oliveira, and Raoni Rajão. 2021. “Brazil’s Sugarcane Embitters the EU-Mercosur Trade Talks.” Scientific Reports 11 (1): 13768.

Fonseca Júnior, Gelson. 1998. “A Legitimidade e Outras Questões Internacionais: Poder e Ética entre as Nações.” Paz e Terra.

Grieger, Gisela. 2020. “Amazon Deforestation and EU-Mercosur Deal.” European Parliamentary Research Service 29.

Haas, Peter M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.

Hirst, Monica. 2024. A Política Externa Brasileira e suas Agendas de Pesquisa: Entre a Dimensão Conceitual e o Sentido Prático. Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão (FUNAG).

Lago, André Aranha Corrêa do. 2006. Estocolmo, Rio, Joanesburgo: O Brasil e as Três Conferências Ambientais das Nações Unidas. Instituto Rio Branco; Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão.

Lessa, Antônio Carlos. 2010. História das Relações Internacionais do Brasil. Saraiva.

Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Jørgen Randers, and William W. Behrens III. 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.

Severino, Milena Dune, e Victor Augusto Rocha Cantarino. 2023. “Do Desenvolvimento Irrestrito ao Desenvolvimento Sustentável: O Entendimento do Conceito de Desenvolvimento na Política Externa Brasileira em Estocolmo 72 e Rio 92.” Revista Interdisciplinar de Relações Internacionais (RICRI) 10 (20): 220-244.

UNFCCC – United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2025. “COP 30.” United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

United Nations. 1972. Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment.

United Nations. 1992. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. In Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3-14 June 1992.

United Nations. 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

United Nations. 2012. The Future We Want: Outcome Document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20).

Viola, Eduardo. 1998. “A Globalização da Política Ambiental no Brasil, 1990–1998.” Trabalho apresentado no XXI International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA).

Viola, Eduardo, e Matías Franchini. 2018. Brazil and Climate Change: Beyond the Amazon. Routledge.

WCED – World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. United Nations.

Published

2026-10-09

How to Cite

Menegat Meneguzzi, V. (2026). The trajectory of the sustainable development concept in Brazilian foreign policy. Conversas & Controvérsias, 13(1), e50280. https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-5694.2026.1.50280