Planetary boundaries and international environmental treaties

how does international environmental law embrace the transformations of the Earth System?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-5694.2024.1.46552

Keywords:

Planetary boundaries, Multilateralism, International environmental politics.

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between the scientific consensus on global environmental challenges and the political consensus, established through international agreements, to address these issues. The research maps international environmental treaties signed since 1920, categorizing them in relation to planetary boundaries. This framework was developed in 2009 in the ecological sciences to quantitatively assess the impact of human activities on Earth systems. The methodology employed in this article involved the selection and content analysis of environmental treaties. Given the need to intensify multilateralism to address these environmental challenges, the research concludes that integrating the contributions of planetary boundaries into the political consensus will need action by stakeholders in international environmental policy. There is a need to recognize the differences in the languages of ecological sciences and international politics to facilitate enhanced dialogue.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jéssica Duarte, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Graduated in Energy Engineering from UFRGS and ingénieur diplomé from IMT Mines Alès. Master in international policies from PPGEEI – UFRGS. Member of the Research Group on International Relations and Environment (GERIMA).

Alice da Cruz Busatto, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Graduated in the Integrated Technical Course of Informatics from the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Sul, Charqueadas Campus. Undergraduate in International Relations at UFRGS. Scientific Initiation Scholarship holder of the Research Group in International Relations and Environment (GERIMA-UFRGS).

Laura Brusso Rossi, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Undergraduate in International Relations at UFRGS, Scientific Initiation scholarship holder of the Research Group in International Relations and the Environment (GERIMA-UFRGS).

Thales Jéferson Rodrigues Schmitt, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Graduated in International Relations (UFRGS) and currently studying for a Master's degree in International Strategic Studies (PPGEEI-UFRGS). Member of the Research Group on International Relations and the Environment (GERIMA).

Veridiana Dalla Vecchia, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Journalist, master in Communication and Information (UFRGS) and PhD in International Strategic Studies (UFRGS). Member of the Research Group on International Relations and the Environment (GERIMA).

Leo Evandro Figueiredo dos Santos, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

PhD in International Strategic Studies (PPGEEI) from UFRGS and researcher linked to GERIMA-UFRGS.

Veronica Korber Gonçalves, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil and University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil.

Professor of the Undergraduate Course in International Relations and the Postgraduate Program in International Strategic Studies (PPGEEI). Leader of the Research Group in International Relations and the Environment (GERIMA). PhD in International Relations (UnB), Master in Law (UFSC) and Political Sociology (UFSC). Graduated in Law (UFSC).

References

Adler, Emanuel. 1997. “Seizing the middle ground: constructivism in world politics”. European Journal of International Relations 3, 3 (setembro): 319-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066197003003003

Ebbesson, Jonas. 2014. “Planetary boundaries and the matching of international treaty regimes”. Scandinavian Studies in Law 59 (dezembro): 259-284. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-110454

Fernández, Edgar, e Claire Malwé. 2018. “The emergence of the ‘planetary boundaries’ concept in international environmental law: a proposal for a framework convention”. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 28, 1 (outubro): 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12256

Finnemore, Martha, e Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International norm dynamics and political change”. International Organization 52, 4 (abril): 887-917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789

Gurski, Bruno, Roberto Gonzaga, e Patricia Tendolini. 2012. “Conferência de Estocolmo: um marco na questão ambiental”. Administração de Empresas Em Revista 1, 7 (dezembro): 65-79. https://revista.unicuritiba.edu.br/index.php/admrevista/article/view/466

Haas, Peter M. 2002. “UN Conferences and constructivist governance of the environment”. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 8, 1 (julho): 73-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00801008

Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., David G. Victor, e Yonatan Lupu. 2012. “Political science research on international law: the state of the field”. American Journal of International Law 106, 1 (janeiro): 47-97. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.106.1.0047

Herz, Mônica, e Andrea R. Hoffmann. 2004. “Contribuições teóricas para o estudo de organizações internacionais”. In Organizações internacionais: história e práticas, 41-81. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

Hoffmann, Matthew J. 2017. “Norms and social constructivism in international relations”. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-60

IEA (International Environmental Agreements). 2024a. “IEA Database Project”. https://iea.uoregon.edu/.

IEA (International Environmental Agreements). 2024b. “International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) Defined”. https://iea.uoregon.edu/international-environmental-agreements-ieas-defined

IUCN, FAO, PNUMA. 2024. “ECOLEX The gateway to environmental law”. https://www.ecolex.org/

Keohane, Robert O., e David G. Victor. 2016. “Cooperation and discord in global climate policy”. Nature Clim Change 6, 6 (maio): 570-575. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2937

Kotzé, Louis J. 2019. “Earth system law for the Anthropocene”. Sustainability 11, 23 (dezembro): 6796. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236796

Kotzé, Louis J., e Rakhyun E. Kim. 2019. “Earth system law: the juridical dimensions of earth system governance”. Earth System Governance 1 (janeiro): 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2019.100003

Le Prestre, Philippe. 2001. Ecopolítica Internacional. São Paulo: Senac São Paulo.

Lovbrand, Eva. 2014. “Knowledge and the environment”. In Advances in international environmental politics, editado por Michele Betsill, Kathtyn Hochstetler e Dimitris Stevis, 161-184. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mai, Laura, e Emille Boulot. 2021. “Harnessing the Transformative Potential of Earth System Law: From Theory to Practice”. Earth System Governance 7 (março): 100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2021.100103.

Mitchell, Ronald B., Liliana B. Andonova, Mark Axelrod, Jörg Balsiger, Thomas Bernauer, Jessica F. Green, James Hollway, Rakhyun E. Kim, e Jean-Frédéric Morin. 2020. “What we know (and could know) about international environmental agreements”. Global Environmental Politics 20, 1 (fevereiro): 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00544

Richardson, Katherine, Will Steffen, Wolfgang Lucht, Jorgen Bendtsen, Sarah Cornell, Jonathan Donges, Markus Drüke, et al. 2023. “Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries”. Science Advances 9, 37 (setembro): eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458

Rockström, Johan., Will Steffen, Kevin Noone, Åsa Persson, F. Stuart Chapin III, Eric Lambin, Timothy M. Lenton, et al. 2009. “Planetary boundaries:exploring the safe operating space for humanity”. Ecology and Society 14, 2 (setembro): 32. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232

Sant’anna, Fernanda M., e Helena M. Moreira. 2016. “Ecologia política e relações internacionais: os desafios da ecopolítica crítica internacional”. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 20 (agosto): 205-248. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-335220162006

Varella, Marcelo D. 2009. “O surgimento e a evolução do direito internacional do meio ambiente: da proteção da natureza ao desenvolvimento sustentável”. In Proteção Internacional do Meio Ambiente, organizado por Marcelo D. Varella e Ana Flávia Barros-Platiau, 6-25. Brasília: Unitar, UniCEUB e UnB.

Weiss, Edith B. 2011. “The evolution of international environmental law”. Japanese Yearbook of International Law 54: 1-27. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1669

Young, Oran. 2004. “Institutions and the growth of knowledge: evidence from international environmental regime”. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 4, 2 (junho): 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:INEA.0000040421.85165.18

Downloads

Published

2024-10-01

How to Cite

Duarte, J., Busatto, A. da C., Rossi, L. B., Schmitt, T. J. R., Vecchia, V. D., dos Santos, L. E. F., & Gonçalves, V. K. (2024). Planetary boundaries and international environmental treaties: how does international environmental law embrace the transformations of the Earth System?. Conversas & Controvérsias, 11(1), e46552. https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-5694.2024.1.46552

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024): Single Volume

Section

Interdisciplinary Challenges in the Era of Climate Change

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Conversas & Controvérsias

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright

The submission of originals to Conversas & Controvérsias implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Conversas & Controvérsias as the site of original publication.

Creative Commons License

Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.