Noun phrase complement in Nigerian English

Mayowa Akinlotan

Abstract


The present study investigates the structure of of-complement noun phrase in Nigerian English, comparing findings with those of British and Ghanaian varieties. Of-complement is high in frequency and is a typical complement that has structural tendencies for recursiveness and complexity. A review of literature explicating the structural simplification hypothesis (Gorlach, 1998) suggests that the structure of-complement (or any other type) has received very little attention. Perhaps such scanty works show the different arguments surrounding its syntactic and theoretical status in different grammatical descriptions. Unlike many previous NP frameworks, Huddleston & Pullum (2002, 2004) argued that complements are not only a syntactic element within the NP structure, but also that they are of equal obligatory syntactic status as a head noun within an NP. This framework, unlike many others, therefore conceptualizes the complement slot as an important part in the scheme of things for an NP structure viz-a-viz its complexity. Thus, a serious examination of NP complexity would consider the cooperation (relationship) between a complement and the other syntactic elements constituting the NP structure. This is one of many issues that the present study sheds light on. On the basis of variables representing syntactic function and text type, together with corpus analyses of NPs extracted from the Nigerian component of International Corpus of English (ICE), the structural behavior of of-complement in the lights of other internal elements constituting an NP structure, is clearly shown. It is found that a complement is less likely to co-occur with other all internal elements (20%). Also, it is shown that an of-complement is likely to co-occur with prenominal elements (30%). Furthermore, the paper shows that a structural type of of-complement representing h-complement (i.e. an NP structure consisting of a head noun + a complement, see Huddleston & Pullum, 2002, 2004, and Akinlotan & Housen, 2017) is more likely to occur (26%) as an independent NP structure than to co-occur with postnominal elements (24%). The structural simplification hypothesis is manifested in our corpus data, as it is found out that a complement is more likely to be simple-structured (54%) than complex-structured (46%). On the predictive strength of syntactic function and text type (Biber et al., 1999; Schilk & Schuab, 2016; Akinlotan, 2017), the study finds syntactic function a better predictor than text type.


Keywords


noun phrase complement; syntactic cooperation; complexity; Nigerian English noun phrase; new Englishes.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aarts, F. 1971. On the distribution of noun-phrase types in English clause-structure Lingua, 26, p. 281-293.

DOI: 10.1016/0024-3841(71)90013-1

Anthony, L. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from:

http://www.larenceanthony.net/

Akinlotan, M. & Housen, A. 2017. Noun phrase complexity in Nigerian English: Syntactic function and length outweigh genre in predicting noun phrase complexity, English Today, p. 1-8.

DOI: 10.1017/S0266078416000626

Akinlotan, Mayowa. 2017. Predicting Definite Article Usages in New Englishes: Variety Outweighs Genre and Syntactic Function in Nigerian English. Anglica: An International Journal of English Studies, 2, p. 101-121.

Akinlotan, Mayowa. 2016. The Effects of Structure and Proficiency on Deter-miner Number (Dis)agreement in Nigerian Noun Phrase. Proceedings of the CILC2016 8th International Conference on Corpus Linguistics (p. 1-8). Ed. Antonio Moreno Ortiz & Chantal Perez-Hernandez. Malaga: Spanish Association for Corpus Linguistics.

http://easychair.org/publications/paper/

Akinlotan, Mayowa. 2018. The Occurrence and Structure of Postmodifier in Nigerian noun phrase. Proceedings of the 17th Austin Texas Linguistic Society Conference. Eds. Everdell, Micheal, et al. Austin: Texas Linguistic Society. p. 3-16.

Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English (9th ed.). Harlow: Longman.

Biber, Douglas et al. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP.

Bresnan, J., A. Cueni, T. Nikitina, & R. H. Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In: G. Bouma, I. Kramer, & J. Zwarts (Ed.). Cognitive foundations of interpretation (p. 69-94). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.

Callies, M. 2009. Information Highlighting in Advanced Learner English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Callies, Marcus & Szczesniak, K. 2008. Argument realization, information status and syntactic weight – A learner corpus study of the dative alternation. In Patrick Grommes & Maik Walter (Eds.). Fortgeschrittene Lernervarietäten. Korpuslinguistik und Zweitspracherwerbsforschung (p. 165-187). Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Gisborne, N. 2003. Relative clauses in Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 19, p. 357-371.

DOI: 10.1111/1467-971X.00184

Gorlach, M. 1998. Varieties of English world-wide: Where we stand. Links & Letters, 5, p. 13-36.

Gries, S. Th. 2003. Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. New York: Continuum Press.

Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hudson-Ettle, O. & T. Nilsson. 2002. Orality and noun phrase structure in registers of British and Kenya English. ICAME Journal, 26, p. 33-62.

Meunier, Fanny. 2000. A corpus linguistics approach to interlanguage grammar: noun phrase complexity in advanced learner writing. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve.

Payne, Thomas. 2010. Understanding English Grammar: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rosenbach, A. 2002. Genitive Variation in English. Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin: Mounton de Gruyter.

Rosenbach, A. 2005. Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English. In Language, 81(3), p. 613-644.

Schilk, M. & Schaub, S. 2016. Noun phrase complexity across varieties of English: Focus on syntactic function and text type. English World-Wide, 37(1), p. 58-85.

Wahid, Ridwan. 2013. Definite Article Usage Across Varieties of English. World Englishes, 32(1), p. 23-41.

Wunder, Eva-Maria, Holger Voormann, & Ulrike Gut. 2010. The ICE Nigeria corpus project: Creating an open, rich and accurate corpus. ICAME Journal, 34, p. 78-88.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2018.2.31724

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR

e-ISSN: 2178-3640

  This journal is a member of, and subscribes to the principles of, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) http://www.publicationethics.org

Licença Creative Commons

Except where otherwise noted, content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Editorial Policies of Brazilian Scientific Journals.* Deposit availability: Blue .

 

 Copyright: © 2006-2019 EDIPUCRS