Medição de Traços Patológicos da Personalidade com o PID5BF+M
Propriedades Psicométricas e Dados Normativos Brasileiros
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2025.1.47090Palavras-chave:
Estudo de Validação, Transtornos da Personalidade, Diagn´ósticoResumo
O Personality Inventory for DSM-5 – Brief Form Plus Modified (PID5BF+M) é amplamente utilizado para avaliar traços de personalidade patológicos, mas é necessária a avaliação psicométrica em populações brasileiras. Este estudo investigou a estrutura interna, a confiabilidade, a validade e os dados normativos do PID5BF+M brasileiro. Participaram um total de 4.415 brasileiros, provenientes de quatro bases de dados que já haviam utilizado o instrumento. Os dados foram coletados por meio de redes sociais. A replicabilidade da estrutura fatorial foi avaliada e as correlações com medidas relacionadas à personalidade foram analisadas. Os resultados indicaram consistência interna aceitável para as 16 das 18 facetas (média α = 0,64, DP = 0,11). A estrutura de seis fatores foi replicada, e os escores fatoriais apresentaram correlações consistentes com medidas externas. Dados normativos são apresentados. Esses achados fornecem evidências da confiabilidade e validade do PID5BF+M brasileiro, apoiando sua aplicação segura em avaliações clínicas e em pesquisas futuras sobre traços de personalidade patológicos.
Downloads
Referências
American Psychiatric Association (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. (5th ed. Text Revision). American Psychiatric Publishing.
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code
Bach, B., Brown, T. A., Mulder, R. T., Newton-Howes, G., Simonsen, E., & Sellbom, M. (2021). Development and initial evaluation of the ICD-11 personality disorder severity scale: PDS-ICD-11. Personality and mental health, 15(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1510
Bach, B., & First, M. B. (2018). Application of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders. BMC Psychiatry 18, 351. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1908-3
Bach, B., Kerber, A., Aluja, A., Bastiaens, T., Keeley, J. W., Claes, L., Fossati, A., Gutierrez, F., Oliveira, S. E. S., Pires, R., Riegel, K. D., Rolland, J. P., Roskam, I., Sellbom, M., Somma, A., Spanemberg, L., Strus, W., Thimm, J. C., Wright, A. G. C., & Zimmermann, J. (2020). International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1. Psychopathology, 53(3-4), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507589
Bach, B., Sellbom, M., Skjernov, M., & Simonsen, E. (2018). ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 52(5), 425-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867417727867
Ben-Shachar MS, Lüdecke D, Makowski D (2020). effectsize: Estimation of Effect Size Indices and Standardized Parameters. Journal of Open Source Software, 5(56), 2815. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02815
Bernaards, C. A., & Jennrich, R. I. (2005). Gradient Projection Algorithms and Software for Arbitrary Rotation Criteria in Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(5), 676-696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404272507
Clarkin, J. F., Caligor, E., & Sowislo, J. F. (2020). An Object Relations Model Perspective on the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (DSM-5). Psychopathology, 53(3-4), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1159/000508353
De Clercq, B., De Fruyt, F., De Bolle, M., Van Hiel, A., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2014). The hierarchical structure and construct validity of the PID‐5 trait measure in adolescence. Journal of Personality, 82(2), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12038
d'Huart, D., Seker, S., Bürgin, D., Birkhölzer, M., Boonmann, C., Schmid, M., & Schmeck, K. (2023). The stability of personality disorders and personality disorder criteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical psychology review, 102, 102284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102284
Facon, M. F., Dierckx, E., van Alphen, S. P., & Rossi, G. (2023). Integration of the DSM-5 and ICD-11 maladaptive traits in older adults: Construct validity of the PID-5-BF+ M. Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie, 54(1).
Freilich, C. D., Krueger, R. F., Hobbs, K. A., Hopwood, C. J., & Zimmermann, J. (2023). The DSM-5 maladaptive trait model for personality disorders. In R. F. Krueger & P. H. Blaney (Eds.), Oxford textbook of psychopathology ( 4th ed.) (pp. 604–627). Oxford University Press.
García, L. F., Aluja, A., Urieta, P., & Gutierrez, F. (2022). High convergent validity among the five-factor model, PID-5-SF, and PiCD. Personality disorders, 13(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000486
Gutiérrez, F., Aluja, A., Ruiz Rodríguez, J., Peri, J. M., Gárriz, M., Garcia, L. F., Sorrel, M. A., Sureda, B., Vall, G., Ferrer, M., & Calvo, N. (2023). Borderline, where are you? A psychometric approach to the personality domains in the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision (ICD-11). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 14(3), 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000592
Hopwood, C. J., & Bleidorn, W. (2018). Stability and change in personality and personality disorders. Current opinion in psychology, 21, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.034
Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G., Krueger, R. F., Schade, N., Markon, K. E., & Morey, L. C. (2013). DSM-5 pathological personality traits and the Personality Assessment Inventory. Assessment, 20(3), 269-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113486286
Hualparuca-Olivera, L., Calle-Arancibia, M., Caycho-Rodríguez, T., & Bach, B. (2024). Self-reported ICD-11 personality disorder severity in Peruvian adolescents: Structure, validity, and tentative cutoffs. Journal of Personality Disorders, 38(4), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2023_38_499
Hualparuca-Olivera, L., Caycho-Rodríguez, T., Torales, J., & Ramos-Campos, D. (2023). Convergence between the dimensional PD models of ICD-11 and DSM-5: a meta-analytic approach. Frontiers in psychiatry, 14, 1325583. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1325583
Huprich S. K. (2020). Personality Disorders in the ICD-11: Opportunities and Challenges for Advancing the Diagnosis of Personality Pathology. Current psychiatry reports, 22(8), 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-01161-4
Kerber, A., Schultze, M., Müller, S., Rühling, R. M., Wright, A. G. C., Spitzer, C., Krueger, R. F., Knaevelsrud, C., & Zimmermann, J. (2022). Development of a Short and ICD-11 Compatible Measure for DSM-5 Maladaptive Personality Traits Using Ant Colony Optimization Algorithms. Assessment, 29(3), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191120971848
Kim, Y. R., Tyrer, P., & Hwang, S. T. (2021). Personality Assessment Questionnaire for ICD‐11 personality trait domains: Development and testing. Personality and Mental Health, 15(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1493
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological medicine, 42(9), 1879–1890. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291711002674
Lugo, V., de Oliveira, S. E. S., Hessel, C. R., Monteiro, R. T., Pasche, N. L., Pavan, G., ... & Spanemberg, L. (2019). Evaluation of DSM‐5 and ICD‐11 personality traits using the Personality Inventory for DSM‐5 (PID‐5) in a Brazilian sample of psychiatric inpatients. Personality and Mental Health, 13(1), 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1436
Martí Valls, C., Balazadeh, K., & Kajonius, P. (2023). Investigating the overlap and predictive validity between Criterion A and B in the alternative model for personality disorders in DSM-5. International Journal of Testing, 23(3), 190-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2023.2195661
McCabe, G. A., & Widiger, T. A. (2020). A comprehensive comparison of the ICD-11 and DSM–5 section III personality disorder models. Psychological Assessment, 32(1), 72-84. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000772
McGrath, J. L., & Reynolds, M. S. (2024). Recognizing and Responding to Patients with Personality Disorders. Emergency medicine clinics of North America, 42(1), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2023.06.015
Morey, L. C., & Hopwood, C. J. (2013). Stability and change in personality disorders. Annual review of clinical psychology, 9, 499–528. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185637
Mulder R. T. (2021). ICD-11 Personality Disorders: Utility and Implications of the New Model. Frontiers in psychiatry, 12, 655548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.655548
Newton-Howes G. (2014). The impact of mental state disorder and personality on social functioning in patients engaged in community mental health care. Australasian psychiatry, 22(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856213500093
Oliveira, N. P. (2021). O modelo diagnóstico de transtornos da personalidade da CID-11: Estudos psicométricos. (Dissertação de Mestrado). Universidade de Brasília.
Oliveira, S. E. S. D., Bandeira, D. R., Primi, R., & Krueger, R. F. (2021). Psychometric properties of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in Brazilian Samples. Psico-USF, 26(spe), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-8271202126nesp11
Oliveira, S. E. S., & Oliveira, N. P. (2023). Adaptação e propriedades psicométricas da versão brasileira da Borderline Pattern Scale (BPS). Recital - Revista de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Almenara/MG, 5(3), 174–196. https://doi.org/10.46636/recital.v5i3.490
Oliveira, S. E. S., Oliveira, T. C., Bandeira, D. R., & Krueger, R. F. (2020). Personality Types and Personality Traits in DSM-5: Do They Really Match? Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 36(spe), e36nspe15. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e36nspe15
Oliveira, S. E. S., Zimmermann, J., Krueger, R. F., & Hutsebaut, J. (2023). Brazilian Version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0: Evidence of Reliability and Validity. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 39(spe), e39nspe05. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e39nspe05.en
Oltmanns J. R., Widiger T. A. (2018). A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: The Personality Inventory for ICD-11. Psychological Assessment, 30(2), 154-169. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000459
Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2019). Evaluating the assessment of the ICD-11 personality disorder diagnostic system. Psychological assessment, 31(5), 674–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000693
Pires, R., Henriques-Calado, J., Sousa Ferreira, A., Bach, B., Paulino, M., Gama Marques, J., Ribeiro Moreira, A., Grácio, J., & Gonçalves, B. (2021). The Utility of ICD-11 and DSM-5 Traits for Differentiating Patients With Personality Disorders From Other Clinical Groups. Frontiers in psychiatry, 12, 633882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.633882
Revelle, W. (2024). psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. R package version 2.4.6, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
Rosseel Y (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Sellbom, M., Solomon-Krakus, S., Bach, B., & Bagby, R. M. (2020). Validation of Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID-5) algorithms to assess ICD-11 personality trait domains in a psychiatric sample. Psychological Assessment, 32(1), 40-49. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pas0000746
Simon, J., Lambrecht, B., & Bach, B. (2023). Cross-walking personality disorder types to ICD-11 trait domains: An overview of current findings. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1175425. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyt.2023.1175425
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
Torgersen, S., Kringlen, E., & Cramer, V. (2001). The prevalence of personality disorders in a community sample. Archives of General Psychiatry 58(6), 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.58.6.590
Tyrer, P., Mulder, R., Kim, Y. R., & Crawford, M. J. (2019). The development of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: An amalgam of science, pragmatism, and politics. Annual review of clinical psychology, 15, 481-502. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736
Tyrer, P., Reed, G. M., & Crawford, M. J. (2015). Classification, assessment, prevalence, and effect of personality disorder. Lancet (London, England), 385(9969), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61995-4
World Helath Organization (2019). ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines for Mental and Behavioural Disorders. World Health Organization.
World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Wu, J., Allman, M., Balzen, K., Hutsebaut, J., & Sharp, C. (2024). First psychometric evaluation of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale—Brief Form 2.0 in adolescents. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000692
Zimmerman, M., Rothschild, L., & Chelminski, I. (2005). The prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(10), 1911-1918. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1911
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Sergio Eduardo Silva de Oliveira, Joana Bücker, Lucas Dannilo Aragão Guimarães, André Pereira Gonçalves, Robert Frank Krueger
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
