Universal Adhesive Systems in Class II Amalgam Restorations


  • Armiliana Soares Nascimento Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco
  • Eliana Alves de Lima Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco
  • Yasmine de Carvalho Souza Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco
  • Joseane Delfino Canto Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco
  • Marcia de Almeida Durão Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco
  • Rodivan Braz Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco




Adhesives, Universal adhesive, Amalgams, Microleakage, Class II


Objective: to assess the effectiveness of adhesive system in reducing microleakage in Class II amalgam restorations.
Methods: The teeth were divided randomly into 3 equal groups: Group I was the control experiment (Copal Vanish); Group II: single Bond Universal 3M-ESPE (with and without acid – 37%); and Group III: All Bond Universal – BISCO (with and without acid – 37%), after the amalgam was condensed. The root apices were then sealed with acrylic resin and stored for 24 hours in 100% humidity. After storage, the specimens were subjected to 500 cycles of thermocycling (5°C and 55°C). The teeth were isolated with cosmetic nail polish and were immersed in 0.5 basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours. The teeth then were sectioned with a diamond disc and observed under a stereomicroscope. Microleakage was assessed using a 0-3 scale of dye penetration. The data was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05).
Results: The microleakage scores revealed less leakage in the experimental groups than in the control group. The microleakage for the adhesives without acid conditioning was reduced, although no statistical significance was recorded (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The immediate adhesive material acted effectively as a barrier for microleakage when it was applied without acid.

Author Biographies

Armiliana Soares Nascimento, Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco

Departamento de Odontologia

Eliana Alves de Lima, Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco

Departamento de Odontologia

Yasmine de Carvalho Souza, Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco

Departamento de Odontologia

Joseane Delfino Canto, Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco

Departamento de Odontologia

Marcia de Almeida Durão, Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco

Departamento de Odontologia

Rodivan Braz, Faculdade de Odontologia de Pernambuco

Departamento de Odontologia


De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005a, 84(2): 118-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204

Mali P, Deshpande S, Singh A. Microleakage of restorative materials: an

in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006; 24: 15-8. https://doi.


Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Sano H, Kaga M, Oguchi H. in vitro degradation of resin-dentin bonds analyzed by microtensile bond test, scanning and transmission eléctron microscopy. Biomaterials 2003a,24(21):3795-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00262-X

Guiraldo RD, Consani S, Santos P H, Sinhoreti M A C, Correr Sobrinho L. Adaptação marginal em restaurações de amálgama de prata associada às técnicas adesivas. Rev Odont Ara 2007,.28 (1):39-43.

Pinto MB. Microleakage in silver amalgam restorations under the influence of condensation forms and use of intermediate materials in marginal interface 2001. 125f. (Doctorate in Dentistry) - Postgraduate Course in Dentistry, Dental Materials, Campinas, Piracicaba.

Setcos JC, Staninec M, Wilson NH. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations. J Adhes Dent 1999;


Mahler DB, Engle JH. Clinical evaluation of amalgam bonding in Class I and II restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:43-9. https://doi. org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0018

Ben-Amar A, Nordenberg D, Liberman R, Fischer J, Gorfil C. The control of marginal microleakage in amalgam restorations using a dentin adhesive: a pilot study. Dent Mater 1987;3:94-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80013-1

Staninec M, Holt M. Bonding of amalgam to tooth structure: tensile adhesion and microleakage tests. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:397-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90030-3

Turner EW, St. Germain HA, Meiers JC. Microleakage of dentin-amalgam bonding agents. Am J Dent 1995;8:191-6.

Ziskind D, Venezia E,Kreisman I, Mass E. Amalgam type, adhesive system, and storage period as influencing factors on microleakage of amalgam restorations. J Prost Dent 2003, 90(3):2 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00421-9

Amin VM. Comparative study of the sealingefficacy of various bondingsystems to Class V dental amalgam restorations. Inter J Adhes Adhes 2006, 26: 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.03.002

Chen L, Suh B. New one-bottle self-etch adhesive is compatible with selfcure materials. Presented at: American Association for Dental Research Annual Meeting; March 24, 2012; Tampa, Florida.

Suh BI. Universal Adhesives: The Evolution of Adhesive Solutions Continues. COMPENDIUM 2014, 35(4):278.

McCURDY Jr. C, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Rhodes BF. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro microleakage of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1974, 88: 592-602. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1974.0107

Ben-Amar A, Cardash HS, Judes H. The sealing of the tooth/amalgam interface by corrosion products. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:101-4.

Brannstrom, M. Dentin and pulp in restorative dentistry. Wolfe Medical Publication Ltd, Castelnuovo, Italia; 1982:70

Li H, Burrow MF & Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mat 2000, 16(1) 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109- 5641(99)00085-8

Reis A, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Gones OM, Patzlaff R, Loguercio AD. Impact of adhesive application to wet and dry dentin on long-term resin-dentin bond strengths. Oper Dent 2007; 32(4):380-7. https://doi. org/10.2341/06-107

Cenci MS, Piva E, Potrich F, Formolo E, Demarco FF, Powers JM. Microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive materials. Braz Dent J 2004;15:13-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103- 64402004000100003

Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000;79:1385-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790060601

Moraes RR, Lima FG, Bueno M, Demarco FF. Storage time influence on the sealing of amalgam restorations using different liners.. Rev Odontol UNESP 2005, 34(3):135-40.

Moore DS, Johnson WW, Kaplan I. A comparison of amalgam microleakage with a 4-META liner and copal varnish. Int J Prosthodont 1995, 8: 461-6.

Perdigão J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent, in press, 2012b.

Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, Osaka A, Meerbeek BV. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J Dent Res 2012; 91(4):376-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512437375

Oliveira FS; Silva SMB; Bijella MFTB, Lima JEO. In vitro evaluation of the marginal microleakage of class II amalgam restoration associated with dentin adhesive. Rev Odontol UNESP 1999, 13(3): 263-8. https://doi. org/10.1590/s0103-06631999000300010

Junior Pereira ES, Bijella MFTB, Silva SMB, Vono BG. In vitro evaluation of marginal microleakage of glass II bonded amalgam restorations using a dentin adhesive and a glass ionomer cement. Rev Odontol UNESP 1999, 13(2): 103-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-06631999000200002

Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore memorial lecture: Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 481-508.

Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Prati C, Tay FR. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 2005;26(9):1035-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.003

do Amaral RC, Stanislawczuk R, Zander-Grande C, Gagler D, Reis A,

Loguercio AD. Bond strength and quality of the hybrid layer of onestep self-etch adhesives applied with agitation on dentin. Oper Dent 2010;35(2):211-9. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-198-L

Loguercio AD, Stanislawczuk R, Mena-Serrano A, Reis A. Effect of 3-year water storage on the performance of one-step self-etch adhesives applied actively on dentine. J Dent 2011a;39(8):578-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.06.005

Reis AF, Oliveira MT, Giannini M, De Goes MF, Rueggeberg FA. The effect of organic solvents on one-bottle adhesives' bond strength to enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 2003;28(6):700-6.

Barbosa JB, Giro EMA, Santos Pinto LAM. Marginal leakage of amalgam restorations: effect of pretreatment of the cavity walls with conventional varnish and fluoride. Rev Odontol UNESP 1997, 26(2): 433-44.

Pucci CR, Giachetti NJ, Araújo MAX. In vitro microleakage of amalgam. Rev Odontol UNESP 1998, 27(2):459-72.

Sansvieiro A, Neto ALM, Matumoto MSS, Blas R. Microleakage in restorations of silver amalgam, lined with simple and modified varnish – Study in vitro. Conscientia e saúde. Rev Cient UNINOVE 2003, 2(002): 43-9.






Original Article