Modality and evidentiality: a discussion of philosophical and formal aspects

  • Monica Monawar Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Palavras-chave: Modality, Evidentiality, Philosophy of language, Formal semantics

Resumo

This work discusses biological, philosophical and formal notions that underlie current approaches on natural language modality. The aim is to promote a theoretical debate of some of the ontological and methodological components that are sometimes taken for granted in current literature on the topic. A discussion on the evolution of language in connection to modality in terms of planning and displacement is promoted, followed by Lewis’s and Stalnaker’s discussions on possible worlds theory. Finally, a comparative approach on Lewis’s and Stalnaker’s perspectives on knowledge and belief is built in order to create a foundation for further readings on the topic of modals and evidentials.

********************************************************************

Modalidade e evidencialidade: uma discussão sobre aspectos filosóficos e formais

Resumo: Este trabalho discute noções biológicas, filosóficas e formais que subjazem abordagens atuais acerca da modalidade em linguagem natural. O objetivo deste é promover um debate teórico de alguns componentes ontológicos e metodológicos que são muitas vezes tidos como conhecidos pela literatura atual neste tópico. Uma discussão sobre a evolução da linguagem em conexão com modalidade em termos de planejamento e deslocamento é promovida, seguida pelas discussões de Lewis e Stalnaker sobre a teoria de mundos possíveis. Finalmente, uma abordagem comparativa das perspectivas de Lewis e Stalnaker acerca de conhecimento e crença é construída para criar a base para leituras futuras no tópico de modais e evidenciais.

Palavras-chave: Modalidade; Evidencialidade; Filosofia da linguagem; Semântica formal

 

 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ADAMS, R. M. Theories of Actuality. NOÛS, p. 211-231, 1974.

BICKERTON, D. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers, 1981.

GETTIER, E. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis, p. 121-123, 1963.

HINTIKKA, J. Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962.

HOCKETT, C. F. The origin of speech. Scientific American, p. 89-96, 1960.

KRATZER, A. What “must” and “can” Must and Can Mean. Linguistics and Philosophy, p. 337-355, 1977.

KRATZER, A. Semantik der Rede: Kontexttheorie, Modalwörter, Konditionalsätze. Kronberg: Scriptor, 1978.

KRATZER, A. Conditional Necessity and Possibility. In: Bäuerle, R.; Egli, U.; von Stechow, A. Semantics from Different Points of View. New York: Springer, 1979. p. 117-147.

KRATZER, A. The Notional Category of Modality. In: Eikmeyer , H. J.; Rieser, H. Words, Worlds and Contexts. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1981. p. 38-74.

KRATZER, A. Conditionals. In: von Stechow, A.; Wunderlich , D. Semantik/Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1991. p. 651-656.

KRATZER, A. Modality. In: von Stechow, A.; Wunderlich , D. Semantik/Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1991. p. 639-650.

KRATZER, A. Modality in Context. 2009.

KRATZER, A. Modals and Conditionals. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

KRATZER, A. Modality for the 21st Century. 19th International Congress of Linguists. Geneva, 2013. p. 181-201.

KRATZER, A. Angelika Kratzer. 2014. Retrieved from: http://people.umass.edu/kratzer/.

KRATZER, A.; Pires de Oliveira, R.; Pessotto , A. L. Talking about Modality: an interview with Angelika Kratzer. ReVEL, p. 8-20, 2014.

LACA, B. Epistemic Modality and Temporal Anchoring. ReVEL, 76-105, 2014.

LARSON, R. K.; Déprez , V.; Yamakido , H. The Evolution of Human Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

LEWIS, D. Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic. Journal of Philosophy, p. 113-126, 1968.

LEWIS, D. Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell, 1973.

LEWIS, D. Adverbs of Quantification. In: Keenan, E. Formal semantics of natural language. Cambridge University Press, 1975. p. 3-15.

LEWIS, D. Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities. Philosophical Review, p. 297-315, 1976.

LEWIS, D. Scorekeeping in a Language Game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, p. 339-359, 1979a.

LEWIS, D. Counterfactual Dependence and Time’s Arrow. NOÛS, p. 455-476, 1979b.

LEWIS, D. Ordering Semantics and Premise Semantics for Counterfactuals. Journal of Philosophical Logic, p. 217-234, 1981.

LEWIS, D. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.

LEWIS, D. Elusive Knowledge. Australian Journal of Philosophy, p. 549-567, 1996.

LEWIS, D. Possible Worlds. In: Laurence, S.; Macdonald, C. Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998. p. 96-102.

MATTHEWSON, L. Evidential Restrictions on Epistemic Modals. In: Alonso -Ovalle , L.; Menendez -Benito , P. Epistemic Indefinites. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (in press).

MATTHEWSON, L. Evidence type, evidence location, evidence strength. In: Lee, C.; Park, J. (submitted). PORTNER, P. Modality. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

STALNAKER, R. A Theory of Conditionals. In: Rescher , N. Studies in logical theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 1968. p. 98-112.

STALNAKER, R. Possible Worlds. NOÛS, p. 65-75, 1976.

STALNAKER, R. Context and content: essays on intentionality in speech and thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.

STALNAKER, R. A Defense of Conditional Excluded Middle. In: Harper , W. L.; Stalna ker, R.; Pearce, G. Ifs. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981. p. 87-104.

STALNAKER, R. On Logics of Knowledge and Belief. Philosophical Studies, p. 169-199, 2006.

von FINTEL, K. Modality and Language. In: Borchert , D. Encyclopedia of

Philosophy. 2. ed. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2006. von FINTEL, K.; Gillies, A. S. Must... Stay... Strong! Natural Language Semantics, p. 351-383, 2010.

von FINTEL, K.; Heim, I. Intensional Semantics. Cambridge: MIT, 2010.

Publicado
2016-10-07
Como Citar
Monawar, M. (2016). Modality and evidentiality: a discussion of philosophical and formal aspects. Letras De Hoje, 51(3), 412-420. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2016.3.22525