Social and human networks, or the logic of unsociable human sociability

Authors

  • Agemir Bavaresco PUCRS
  • Tiago Porto PUCRS
  • Giovane Martins PUCRS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2015.2.22473

Keywords:

Social networks. Anthropology of Technology. Cyberanthropology. Philosophy.

Abstract

Social networks merge the real and the virtual in virtual actuality that forms the basis of human networks. In this sense, the anthropology of technology, in conjunction with cyberanthropology, allows the diagnosis of a new identity of human beingsstemming from the phenomenon of social networks. Do the intersubjective relations established in different contexts of publicity and pluralism of meanings emerging from the interface with social networks, which dilute the limits of human communication and boundaries, still allow usto understand the real and the virtual in a dualistic way? Or, rather, what is the immanent logic of the antagonism of unsociable human sociability that allows the scenarios of “outrage and hope” in global self-communication? The following interdisciplinary study aims first to involve cyberanthropology, anthropology of technology and philosophy to show the cultural implications of the identity of human beings connected to social networks. Then, we study the genealogy of the anthropology of techno-science and Kant’s antagonism in unsociable human sociability. Finally, we describe the Hegelian logic of reflexive manifestation between free objectivity and subjectivity, and communication as virtuality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BUDKA, Philipp; KREMSER, Manfred. “Cyber Anthropology – Anthropology of Cyber Culture”. In: Contemporary issues in socio cultural anthropology: Perspectives and research activities from Austria. KHITTEL, Stefan et al. (Ed.). Vienna: Loecker, 2004, p. 213-226.

CASTELLS, Manuel. A galáxia da Internet: reflexões sobre a Internet, os negócios e a sociedade. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Ed., 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89613-1

ESCOBAR, Arturo. “Welcome to Cyberia: notes of the anthropology of cyberculture”. In: Current anthropology, 35, 3, (June 1994), p. 211-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/204266

FISCHER, Michael M. J. Futuros antropológicos. Redefinindo a cultura na era tecnológica. Trad. Luiz F. D. Duarte. Rio de Janeiro: 2009.

GIBSON, William. Neuromancer. Tradução de Fábio Fernandes. 4. ed. São Paulo: Aleph, 2008.

HEGEL, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Linhas fundamentais da Filosofia do Direito ou Direito Natural e Ciência do Estado em compêndio. Tradução, notas, glossário e bibliografia de Paulo Meneses et al. São Paulo: Loyola; São Leopoldo: UNISINOS, 2010.

HEGEL, G. W. F. A Efetividade. In: HEGEL, G. W. F. Wissenschaft der Logik – II. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1986, v. 6. Tradução de Christian Iber, Michela Bordignon, Agemir Bavaresco, Marloren Miranda e Tomás F. Menk. Revisão Técnica: Luis Sander, Porto Alegre, 2014 (texto usado em Seminário).

NADAI, Bruno. Teleologia e História em Kant: a Ideia de uma história universal de um ponto de vista cosmopolita. Dissertação. Programa de Pós-Graduação da Faculdade de Filosofia da USP, São Paulo, 2006.

KANT, Immanuel. Ideia de uma história universal de um ponto de vista cosmopolita. Tradução de Rodrigo Naves e Ricardo R. Terra. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.

KELTY, Christopher. Two Bits: Free Software and the Social Imagination after the Internet. Durham, Duke University Press, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822389002

KERCKHOVE, Derrick de. A pele da cultura. Lisboa: Relógio D’Água, 1995, p. 294.

KLOTZ, Christian. Manifestação e liberdade em Hegel. Texto impresso apresentado na XVI ANPOF, Campos do Jordão 2014, 17 p.

Published

2015-11-18

How to Cite

Bavaresco, A., Porto, T., & Martins, G. (2015). Social and human networks, or the logic of unsociable human sociability. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 60(2), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2015.2.22473