Narratividade histórica e natureza humana em Hume
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2014.3.13888Palavras-chave:
Hume. Narratividade. Natureza humana.Resumo
O artigo pretende discutir o estatuto da narratividade na obra de Hume, não apenas como metodologia, mas como o único meio através do qual a natureza humana ela mesma pode ser abordada no interior de seu projeto de uma ciência do homem. Em uma perspectiva exclusivamente empírica, a história se revela como o nível de composição de narrações – tanto no estudo dos costumes quanto ao lidar com a formação das relações de ideias. A leitura de muitos comentadores de Hume, que dissociam o Tratado da História da Inglaterra como dois desenvolvimentos separados de uma escrita heterogênea, pode ser desconstruída, assim, através de uma consideração atenta do que está em jogo nas demandas de objetividade no contexto da historiografia pós-rankeana.
Downloads
Referências
BEAM, C. “Hume and Nietzsche: Naturalists, Ethicists, Anti-Christians”. In: Hume Studies, XXII:2 (1996), p. 299-324.
BECK, L. W. Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven – London: Yale University Press, 1978.
BENTLEY, M. “Introduction: Approaches to Modernity: Western Historiography since the Enlightenment”. In: BENTLEY, M. (Ed.). Companion to Historiography. London – New York: Routledge, 1997, p. 379-475.
CAPALDI, N. “Hume as Social Scientist”. In: TWEYMAN, S. (Ed.). David Hume – Critical Asessments. London – New York: Routledge, 1995. Vol. VI.
COLINGWOOD, R. G. The Idea of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1955.
CONNIFF, J. “Hume on Political Parties: The Case for Hume as a Whig”. In: Eighteenth-Century Studies, 12:2 (1978-1979), p. 150-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2738042
DELEUZE, G. Empirisme et subjectivité. Paris: PUF, 1993.
EMERSON, R. L. Essays on David Hume, Medical Men and the Scottish Enlightenment. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.
ESKILDSEN, K. R. “Leopold Ranke’s Archival Turn: Location and Evidence in Modern Historiography”. In: Modern Intellectual History, 5:3 (2008), p. 425-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244308001753
FIESER, J. A Bibliography of Hume´s Writings and Early Responses. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2003.
______. Early Responses to Hume. Bristol: Thoemmes, 2005a. Vol. 2 – Early Responses to Hume’s Moral, Literary and Political Writings II.
______. Early Responses to Hume. Bristol: Thoemmes, 2005b. Vol. 3 – Early Responses to Hume’s Metaphysical and Epistemological Writings I.
______. Early Responses to Hume. Bristol: Thoemmes, 2005c. Vol. 7 – Early Responses to Hume’s History of England I.
FORBES, D. Hume’s Philosophical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
______. “Hume’s Science of Politics”. In: MORICE, G. P. (Ed.). David Hume Bicentenary Papers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1977.
FORCE, J. E. “Hume’s Interest in Newton and Science”. In: Hume Studies, XIII:2 (1987), p. 166-216.
FOUCALUT, Michel. Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard, 1966.
GRENE, M. “Hume: Sceptic and Tory”. In: Journal of the History of Ideas, 4 (1943), p. 333-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2707258
HICKS, Ph. “Bolingbroke, Clarendon, and the Role of the Classical Historian”. In: Eighteenth Century Studies, 20:4 (1987), p. 445-471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2738775
HUME, D. A Dissertation on the Passions; The Natural History of Religion. Oxford: Ed. by Tom Beauchamp, Oxford University Press, 2007 [=Diss.].
______. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: Ed. by David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton, Oxford Univeristy Press, 2005 [= T, seguido dos números correspondentes a parte, livro, seção e parágrafo].
______. An Enquiry concerning the Human Understanding. Oxford: Ed. by Tom Beauchamp, Oxford University Press, 1999 [= EHU, seguido dos números correspondentes à seção e ao parágrafo].
______. An Enquiry concerning the Principals of Morals. Oxford: Ed. by Tom Beauchamp, Oxford University Press, 2005 [= EPM, seguido do número correspondente à seção].
______. Essays Moral, Political and Literary. Indianapolis: Liberty Funds, 1985 [= Essays].
______. The History of England. Indianapolis: Liberty Funds, 1983. 6 v. [= HE, seguido dos números correspondentes ao volume, capítulo e página].
______. The Letters of David Hume. London: Oxford University Press, 1932. 2 v. [= Letters, seguido do número correspondente ao volume].
JONES, P. Hume’s Sentiments. Their Ciceronian and French Context. Edinburgh: The Edinburgh University Press, 1982.
KEMP-SMITH, N. “Kant’s Relation to Hume and to Leibnitz”. In: The Philosophical Review, 24:3 (1915), p. 288-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2178334
______. The Philosophy of David Hume: A Critical Study of Its Origins and Central Doctrines. London: Macmillan, 1941.
KIDD, C. Subverting Scotland’s Past: Scottish Whig Historians and the Creation of an Anglo-British Identity, 1689-c. 1830. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660290
MALHERBE, M. Kant ou Hume ou la raison et le sensible. Paris: Vrin, 1993.
______. La philosophie empiriste de David Hume. Paris: Vrin, 1992.
MEYER, P. H. “Voltaire and Hume as Historians: A Comparative Study of the Essai sur les moeurs and the History of England”. In: PMLA, 73:1 (1958), p. 51-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/460275
MOSSNER, E. C. “An Apology for David Hume, Historian”. In: PMLA, 56:3 (1941a), p. 657-690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/458989
______. “David Hume’s ‘an Historical Essay on Chivalry and Modern Honour”. In: Modern Philology, 45:1 (1947), p. 54-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/388747
______. The Life of David Hume. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.
______. “Was Hume a Tory Historian? Facts and Reconsiderations”. In: Journal of the History of Ideas, 2:2 (1941b), p. 225-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2707114
NORTON, D. F. “History and Philosophy in Hume’s Thought”. In: NORTON, D. F.; POPKIN, R. (Eds.). David Hume: Philosophical Historian. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965.
NOXON, J. Hume´s Philosophical Development – A Study of his Methods. London: Oxford University Press, 1973.
OKIE, L. Augustan Historical Writing – Histories of England in the English Enlightenment. Maryland: University Press of America, 1991.
PARUSNIKOVA, Z. “Against the Spirit of Foundations: Postmodernism and David Hume”. In: Hume Studies, XIX:1 (1993), p. 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2011.0468
PEARS, D. “Hume’s Empiricism and Modern Empiricism”. In: PEARS, D. (Ed.). David Hume – A Symposium. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1966, p. 11-30.
______. Hume’s System – An Examination of the First Book of his Treatise. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
PHILLIPS, M. S. “Distance and Historical Representation”. In: History Workshop Journal, 57 (2004), p. 123-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/57.1.123
______. Society and Sentiment: Genres of Historical Writing in Britain, 1740-1820. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
______. The Most Illustrious Philosopher and Historian of the Age: Hume’s History of England. In: RADCLIFFE, E. S. (Ed.). A Companion to Hume. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, p. 406-422.
POPKIN, R. “Skepticism and the Study of History”. In: NORTON, D. F.; POPKIN, R. (Eds.). David Hume: Philosophical Historian. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965, p. IX-XXXI.
RADCLIFFE, E. “Introduction”. In: RADCLIFFE, E. S. (Ed.). A Companion to Hume. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, p. 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696583.ch
RANKE, L. von. Englische Geschichte, vornehmlich im siebzehnten Jahrhundert. 3 Bände. Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot, 21870.
RANKE, L. von. Geschichte der romanischen und germanischen Völker von 1494 bis 1514. Leipzig: Duncker und Humblot, 1885.
RUSSELL, P. Freedom and Moral Sentiment – Hume’s Way of Naturalizing Responsibility. London: Oxford University Press, 1995.
SABINE, G. H. “Hume’s Contribution to the Historical Method”. In: The Philosophical Review, 15:1 (1906), p. 17-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2177536
SAPADIN, E. “A Note on Newton, Boyle, and Hume’s ‘Experimental Method’”. In: Hume Studies, XXIII:2 (1997), p. 337-344.
STEWART, M. A. “Hume’s Intellectual Development 1711-1752”. In: FRASCA-SPADA, M.; KAIL, J. P. E. (Eds.). Impressions of Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, p. 11-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199256525.003.0002
STRAWSON, P. F. Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays. Oxford: Routledge, 2008a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203882566
______. Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties – The Woodbridge Lectures, 1983. Oxford: Routledge, 2008b.
TODD, W. B. Foreword. In: HUME, D. The History of England. Indianapolis: Liberty Funds, 1983. Vol. 1, p. XI-XXIII.
TREVOR-ROPER, H. R. “David Hume: Politico e Storico by Giuseppe Giarrizzo (review)”. In: History and Theory, 3:3 (1964). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2504239
______. “Hume as Historian”. In: PEARS, D. F. (Ed.). David Hume – A Symposium. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1966.
VOLTAIRE. Éloge Historique de la Raison. In: Oeuvres complètes. Paris: Garnier, 1877. Tome XXI.
______. “Histoire”. In: Encyclopédie, ou Dictionnaire Raisonné des Sciences, des Arts et des Métiers, par une Société de Gens de Lettres. Neufchastel: Chez Samuel Faulche & Compagnie Libraires & Imprimeurs, 1765. Tome Huitième (H-IT), p. 220-225.
WARREN, J. “The Rankean Tradition in British Historiography, 1840 to 1950”. In: BERGEN, S. et al. Writing History – Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
WERTZ, S. K. Between Hume’s Philosophy and History: Historical Theory and Practice. Maryland: University Press of America, 2000.
______. “Collingwood’s Understanding of Hume”. In: Hume Studies, XX:2 (1994), p. 261-287.
WOODWARD, J. An Attempt Towards a Natural History of the Fossils of England. London: Fayram, 1729. Vol. 1.
WOOTON, D. “David Hume: ‘The Historian’”. In: NORTON, D. F.; TAYLOR, J. (Eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 22009, p. 447-479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521859868.014
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Direitos Autorais
A submissão de originais para a Revista Veritas implica na transferência, pelos autores, dos direitos de publicação. Os direitos autorais para os artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos da revista sobre a primeira publicação. Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente a Revista Veritas como o meio da publicação original.
Licença Creative Commons
Exceto onde especificado diferentemente, aplicam-se à matéria publicada neste periódico os termos de uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional, que permite o uso irrestrito, a distribuição e a reprodução em qualquer meio desde que a publicação original seja corretamente citada. Copyright: © 2006-2020 EDIPUCRS
