Cognitive Science
The value of the diversity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15448/1983-4012.2022.1.41837Keywords:
Cognitive Science history, Interdisciplinarity, Cognitivism, Embodied cognition, NeurobiologyAbstract
In the 20th century a new scientific field emerged with the aim of investigating the human mind and the cerebral realization of it. Many other conceptual and technological advances accompanied this period, for example the logial-mathematical language and the concept of computing that maked the understanding of the human mind be like a computational process. This new field was structured in the 1970 decade with an interdisciplinary approach and a cognitivist emphasis. Later, in 1990, the cognitivism account was questioned by the embodied cognition hypothesis and an organic neurobiological perspective of human cognition. To us, the scientific investigation of the human mind is a very wide and diversified field, with many enlightening debates. This diversity is precisely what makes cognitive sciense so important for the interprise of know the human mind in a naturalized approach that is complementary of the philosophical abstractions. In this context is necessary to understanding the historical path of cognitive sciense and be able of messured the value of this field for the progressive undertanding of what human mind is.
Downloads
References
ALMADA, Leonardo Ferreira; MESQUITA, Luiz Otávio de Sousa. Corpo, cérebro e ambiente: o organismo como alicerce da mente consciente. Kínesis, [S. I.], v. 9, n. 21, p. 105-125, 2017.
BAUM, Carlos; KROEFF, Renata Fischer da Silveira. Enação conceitos introdutórios e contribuições contemporâneas. Polis e Psique, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 207-236, 2018.
BECHTEL, William. How can philosophy be a true cognitive science discipline? Topics in Cognitive Science, [S. l.], n. 2, p. 357-366, 2010.
BENDER, Andrea. The value of diversity in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. 853-863, 2019.
BICKLE, John; MANDIK, Peter; LANDRETH, Anthony. The Philosophy of Neuroscience. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [S. l.], 2019. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/neuroscience. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2019.
BRITO, Carlos. Um caminho do meio entre tradição e radicalismo em cognição. Prometheus Journal of Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 33, 2020.
BUCKNER, Cameron; GARSON, James. Connectionism. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/connectionism. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2021.
CANDIOTTO, Kleber Bez Birolo. Abordagem antirrepresentacionista da ciência cognitiva incorporada. Revista de Filosofia: Aurora, [S. l.], v. 26, n. 39, p. 515-532, 2014.
CARLS-DIAMANTE, Sidney. Make up your mind: octopus cognition and hybrid explanations. Synthese, [S. l.], n. 199, 143-158, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.research-gate.net/publication/330694215_Make_up_your_mind_octopus_cognition_and_hybrid_explanations Acesso em: 10 fev. 2020.
CARVALHO, Eros Moreira de; ROLLA, Giovanni. An enactive-ecological approach to information and uncertainty. Frontiers in Psycology, [S. l.], n. 11, p. 1-11, 2020.
CESCON, Everaldo. Quatro perspectivas contemporâneas em filosofia da mente. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, [S. l.], v. 3, p. 321-335, 2010.
CHEMERO, Anthony. Radical embodied cognitive science. Review of General Psychology, [S. l.], v. 17, n. 2, p. 145-150, 2013.
CHURCHLAND, Paul Montgomery. Matéria e consciência: uma introdução contemporânea à filosofia da mente. São Paulo: UNESP, 2004.
CLARK, Andy. Associative Engines: connectionism, concepts and representational change. Massachusetts: MIT Press,1993.
CLARK, Andy; TORIBIO, Josefa. Doing without Representing? Synthese, [S. l.], v. 101, n. 3 p. 401-431, 1994. Disponível em: www.jstor.org/stable/20117968. Acesso em: 23 jun. 2020.
CLARK, Andy. Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1997.
CLARK, Andy. Embodied, situated, and distributed cognition. In: BECHTEL, W.; GRAHAM, . A companion to cognitiveScience. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers, 1999. p. 506-517.
CLARK, Andy. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and brain sciences, [S. l.], n. 36, p. 181-253, 2013.
COGNITIVE science. In: STANFORD encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University, c2018. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cognitive-science Acesso em: 20 jul. 2019.
COOPER, Richard P. Multidisciplinary flux and multiple research traditions within cognitive science. Topics in cognitive science, v. 11, n. 4, p. 867-879, 2019. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tops.12460. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2020.
DI PAOLO, Ezequiel; THOMPSON, Evan. The enactive approach. In: SHAPIRO, L. Routledge handbooks in philosophy. The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group, 2014. p. 68-78.
DUPUY, Jean-Pierre. On the origins of cognitive science: the mechanization of the mind. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2009.
ENGEL, Pascal. Introdução à filosofia do espírito. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget, 1996.
GARDNER, Howard. The mind’s new science. New York: Basic Books, 1987.
GENTNER, Dedre. Cognitive Science is and should be pluralistic. Topics in Cognitive Science, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. 884-89, 2019.
GONZÁLEZ, Juan C.; MARTÍNEZ, Rosa Icela Ojeda. Francisco Varela y el desarrollo de las Ciencias cognitivas en América Latina. Polis Revista Latinoamericana, Santiago de Chile, 2016. Disponível em: http://polis.revues.org/11949. Acesso em: 20 ago. 2018.
HALLOWELL, Ronan. Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela’s contribution to media ecology: autopoiesis, the Santiago School of Cognition, and enactive cognitive science. Proceedings of the Media Ecology Assocation, [S. I.], n. 10, p. 143-158, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.media-ecology.net/publications/MEA_proceedings/v10/index.html. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2019.
HUFFERMANN, Jeferson Diello. Variedades do enativismo: propostas radicais e cognição superior. Perspectiva Filosófica, [S. l.], v. 46, n. 2, p. 31-52, 2019.
HASELAGER, Pim; GROOT, André de; VAN RAPPARD, Hans. Representationalism vs. anti-representationalism: a debate for the sake of appearance. Philosophical Psychology, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 1, p. 5-23, 2003.
KANDEL, Eric R. Princípios de neurociências. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: AMGH, 2014.
KIM, Jaegwon. El problema mente-cuerpo tras cincuenta años. Azafea – Revista. de Filosofía, [S. l.], n. 4, p. 45-63, 2003.
MARTÍNEZ, Lino Iglesias. La Ciencia Cognitiva Introducción Y Claves Para Su Debate Filosófico. Trabajo de Investigación dirigido por el Prof. Jaime Nubiola. Universidad de Navarra: Espanha, 2006.
MARTÍNEZ-FREIRE, Pascual F. El enfoque enactivo en las ciencias cognitivas. Ludus Vitalis, [S. l.], v. XIV, n. 26, p. 129-140, 2006. Disponível em: http://ludus-vitalis.org/html/textos/26/26-07_martinez-freire.pdf. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2018.
MATURANA, Humbero R.; VARELA, Francisco G. A árvore do conhecimento: as bases biológicas do entendimento humano. Campinas: Editorial Psy, 1995.
MATURANA, Humbero R.; VARELA, Francisco G. De máquinas y seres vivos. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitária, 1998.
MATURANA, Humberto R. Cognição, ciência e vida cotidiana. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2001.
MILLER, George A. The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 3, p. 141-144, 2003.
NÚÑEZ, R.; ALLEN, M.; GAO, R.; MILLER, R.C.; RELAFORD-DOYLE, J.; SEMENUKS, A. What happened to cognitive science? Nature Human Behaviour, [S. l.], n. 3, p. 783-791, 2019.
PICCININI, Gualtiero. Jean-Pierre Dupuy, the mechanization of mind: on the origens of Cognitive Science. Minds and Machines, [S. l.], n. 12, p. 449-453, 2002.
PITT, David. Mental representation. In: ZALTA, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. [S. l.], Spring 2020 Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-representation. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2021.
PYLYSHYN, Zenon. Computation and cognition: issues in the foundations of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 111-132, 1980.
REIS, Cláudio. Por um pluralismo de estratégias nas ciências cognitivas. Perspectiva Filosófica, [S. l.], v. 46, n. 2, p. 53-70, 2019.
ROLLA, Giovanni. A tensão epistemológica no programa de pesquisa sobre cognição corporificada. Pensando revista de Filosofia, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 17, p. 290-304, 2018.
SHAPIRO, Lawrence. The mind doesn’t work that way: the scope and limits of computational psychology. The quarterly review of biology, [S. l.], v. 76, n. 3, p. 384, 2001.Disponível em: www.jstor.org/stable/2664935. Acesso em: 10 set. 2019.
SHAPIRO, Lawrence. Embodied cognition: new problems of philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2011.
SHAPIRO, Lawrence; STOLZ, Steven A. Embodied cognition and its significance for education. Theory and Research in Education, [S. l.], v. 17, n. 1, p. 19-39, 2018.
STEIN, Sofia Inês Albornoz. A epistemologia naturalizada e a negação de princípios a priori do conhecimento. In: DUTRA, Luiz Henrique de A.; MORTARI, Cézar Augusto (org.). Princípios: Seu Papel na Filosofia e nas Ciências. Florianópolis: NEL/UFSC, 2000.
STRUBE, Gerhard. Cognitive Science: Overview. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. [S. l.], 2001. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290302552_Cognitive_Science_Overview. Acesso em: 20 out. 2021.
TEIXEIRA, João de Fernandes (org.). Mentes e Máquinas: uma introdução à ciência cognitiva. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas, 1998.
TEIXEIRA, João de Fernandes. Mente, cérebro e cognição. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 2000.
THAGARD, Paul. Mente: introdução à ciência cognitiva. Porto Alegre: ArtMed, 1998.
THAGARD, Paul. Cognitive Science. In: STANFORD encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University, c2018. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/cognitive-science. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2020.
THOMPSON, Evan. Mind in life: biology, phenomenology and the sciences of mind. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2007.
VARELA, Francisco; MATURANA, Humberto; URIBE. Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and model. Biosystems, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 4, p. 187-196, 1974.
VARELA, Francisco. Living ways of sense-making: a middle path for neuroscience. In: LIVINGSTON, Paisly. Disorder and order: proceedings of the Stanford International Symposium. Sep. 1981. Saratoga: Anma Libri, 1984. p. 208-233.
VARELA, Francisco, THOMPSON, Eleanor; ROSCH, Evan. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Massachusetts MIT Press, 1991.
VARELA, Francisco. Conhecer: as ciências cognitivas tendências e perspectivas. Lisboa Instituto Piaget, 1994.
VARELA, Francisco. El fenómeno de la vida. Santiago de Chile Dolmen Ediciones, 2000.
VASCONCELLOS, Silvio José Lemos; VASCONCELLOS, Cristiane Teresinha. Uma análise das duas revoluções cognitivas. Psicologia em Estudo, [S. l.], v. 12, n. 2, p. 385-339, 2007.
VON ECKARDT, Barbara. What is Cognitive Science? Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1995.
WILSON, Margaret. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 4, p. 625-636, 2002.
WILSON, Robert A.; KEIL, Frank C. The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999.
WILSON, Robert A.; CLARK, Andy. How to Situate Cognition: Letting Nature Take its Course. In: AYDEDE, M. ROBBINS, P. (ed.). The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition 2005. p. 55-77. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242758605. Acesso em:10 jan. 2020.
WILSON, Robert A.; FOGLIA, Lucia. Embodied Cognition. In: ZALTA, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [S. l.], 2017. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/embodied-cognition. Acesso em: 15 jul. 2019.
WOLOSZYN, kinga; HOHOL, Mateusz. Commentary: the poverty of embodied cognition. Frontiers in psychology, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 845, p. 1-3, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317033596. Acesso em: 10 out. 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Intuitio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The submission of originals to Intuitio implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Intuitio as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.
