Strategic behavior in digital reading in english as a second/foreign language: a literature review
This paper aims at presenting an overview of recent studies on students’ strategic behavior while reading online texts in English as a second/foreign language. As the digital environment has unique features that may influence reading comprehension, it is necessary that readers develop strategies to better cope with the online demands (Leu et al., 2014; Cho & Afflerbach, 2017). The studies here described made use of a wide range of data collection procedures, approaching qualitative and quantitative methods, by using surveys, observations, interviews and think-aloud protocols. Their findings collaborate to the understanding that Internet/hyperlinked reading is a complex cognitive process, involving not only the transfer of paper-based strategies but also mastering computer and multimedia skills
Afflerbach, Peter & Cho, Byeong-Young. 2010. Determining and describing reading strategies: Internet and traditional forms of reading. In Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction (p. 201-225). New York: Guilford Press.
Ahmadian, Mousa & Pasand, Parastou Gholami. 2017. EFL learners’ use of online metacognitive reading strategies and its relation to their self-efficacy in reading. The reading matrix: an international online journal, 17(2), p. 117-132.
Anderson, Neil J. 2003. Scrolling, Clicking, and Reading English: Online Reading Strategies in a Second/Foreign Language. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 3(3), p. 1-33.
Azmuddin, Ruhil Amal, Nor, Fariza Mohd, & Hamat, Afendi. 2017. Metacognitive Online Reading and Navigational Strategies by Science and Technology University Students. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 17(3), p. 18-36.
Chen, Lisa Wen Chun. 2015. Taiwanese EFL Learners’ Perceived Use of Online Reading Strategies. The IAFOR Journal of Education, 3(2), p. 68-80.
Cho, Byeong-Young & Afflerbach, Peter. 2017. An Evolving Perspective of Constructively Responsive Reading Comprehension Strategies in Multilayered Digital Text Environments. In Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed., p. 109-134). New York: Guilford Press.
Coiro, Julie. 2003. Reading comprehension on the internet: expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56(5), p. 458-464.
Coiro, Julie & Dobler, Elizabeth. 2007. Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), p. 214-257.
Ericsson, K. Anders & Simon, Herbert A. 1980. Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, p. 215-251.
Gagné, Ellen D., Yekovich, Carol Walker, & Yekovich, Frank R. 1993. The cognitive psychology of school learning. New York, USA: Harper Collins.
Grabe, William. 2009. Reading in a second language: moving from theory to practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gilbert, John. 2017. A study of ESL students’ perceptions of their digital reading. The reading matrix: an international online journal, 17(2), p. 179-195.
Hahnel, Carolin, Goldhammer, Frank, Naumann, Johannes, & Kröhne, Ulf. 2016. Effects of linear reading, basic computer skills, evaluating online information, and navigation on reading text. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, p. 486-500.
Huang, Hsin-chou; Chern, Chiou-lan, & Lin, Chih-cheng. 2009. EFL learners’ use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An exploratory study. Computers & Education, 52, p. 13-26.
Kintsch, Walter. 1998. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Leu, DonaldJ., Zawilinski, Lisa; Forzani, Elena, & Timbrell, Nicole. 2014. Best Practices in Teaching the New Literacies of Online Research and Comprehension. In Best Practices in Literacy Instruction (5th ed., p. 343-364). New York: The Guilford Press.
Kintsch, Walter & van Dijk, Teun A. 1978. Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, p. 263-294.
Mokhtari, Kouider & Sheorey, Ravi. 2002. Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25, p. 2-10.
Mokhtari, Kouider & Reichard, Carla A. 2002. Assessing students’ metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, p. 249-259.
Park, Ho-Ryong & Kim, Deoksoon. 2011. Reading-strategy use by English as a second language learners in online reading tasks. Computers & Education, 57, p. 2156-2166.
Park, Ho-Ryong & Kim, Deoksoon. 2017. English language learners’ strategies for reading online texts: Influential factors and patterns of use at home and in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 82, p. 63-74.
Park, Jaehan, Yang, Jae-Seok, & Hsieh, Yi Chin. 2014. University level second language readers’ online reading and comprehension strategies. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), p. 148-172.
Pressley, Michael & Afflerbach, Peter. 1995. Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Sheorey, Ravi & Mokhtari, Kouider. 2001. Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29, p. 431-449.
Taki, Saeed. 2015. Metacognitive online reading strategy use: Readers’ perceptions in L1 and L2. Journal of Research in Reading, 0(0), p. 1-19.
Tien, Ching-Yi & Talley, Paul. 2014. An examination of offline and online reading strategies in EFL contexts. International journal of Applied linguistics and English literature, 3(5), p. 189-197.
Usó-Juan, Esther & Ruiz-Madrid, Maria Noelia. 2009. Reading printed versus online texts: a study of EFL learners’ strategic reading behavior. International Journal of English Studies, 9(2), p. 59-79.
van den Broek, Paul, Risden, Kirsten, & Husebye-Hartmann, Elizabeth. 1995. The role of readers’ standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In Sources of Coherence in reading. Jersey: LEA. p. 353-373.
Zaki, Izyani Mohamad, Hassan, Fauziah, & Razali, Abu Bakar Mohamed. 2008. ESL students’ online and offline reading strategies: scrolling, clicking, flipping and reading. Asian Journal of University Education, 4(2), p. 61-78.
Copyright (c) 2018 BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.