From the policymakers’ desks to the classrooms: the relationship between language policy, language-in-education policy and the foreign language teaching-learning process
This article aims to discuss the relationship between language policy, language-in-education policy and the foreign language teaching-learning process. In so doing, a critical review of relevant literature is offered with the purpose to clarify how the areas of enquiry related to language and language-in-education policymaking and enactment are intertwined to the practicalities of foreign language curriculum development and syllabus design. Such connection is represented by the politically-, ideologically- and socioculturally-driven choices of policymakers and policy enactors, as well as their influence on everyday foreign language practice. Criticality and authorship are advocated throughout this article as strategies on which teachers and students should rely in order to challenge predetermined and/or decontextualised directives concerning the foreign language teaching-learning process.
Bagno, M. 2007. Preconceito Linguístico: o que é, como se faz (49th ed.). São Paulo: Edições Loyola.
Baldauf Jr., R. B. 2008. Rearticulating the Case for Micro Language Planning in a Language Ecology Context. In A. J. Liddicoat & R. B. Baldauf Jr. (Eds.). Language Planning and Policies: Language Planning in Local Contexts (8th ed., p. 18-41). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ball, S. 1990. Politics and Policy Making in Education. London: Routledge.
Ball, S. 1998. Big Policies/Small World: An introduction to international perspectives in education policy. In Comparative Education, 34(2), p. 119-130.
Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. 2012. How Schools do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary Schools. Oxon: Routledge.
Barnett, R. 2000. Supercomplexity and the Curriculum. In Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), p. 255-265.
Barnett, R. 2009. Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. In: Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), p. 429-440.
Lo Bianco, J. 2001. Talking Globally: Challenges for Foreign-Language Education from New Citizenship and Economic Globalisation. In: Forum for Modern Language Studies, xxxvii(4), p. 456-475.
Brookfield, S. D. 2005. The Power of Critical Theory for Adult Learning and Teaching. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Buttjes, D. 1990. Culture in German Foreign Language Teaching: Making Use of an Ambiguous Past. In M. Byram & D. Buttjes (Eds.). Mediating Languages and Cultures (p. 47-62). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Byram, M. 2008. From Foreign Language Education to Education for Intercultural Citizenship: Essays and Reflections. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Byrne, D. & Ozga, J. 2008. BERA review 2006: education research and policy. In: Research Papers in Education, 23(4), p. 377-405.
Canale, G. 2016. (Re)Searching culture in foreign language textbooks, or the politics of hide and seek. In Language, Culture and Curriculum, 29(2), p. 225-243.
Cury, C. R. J., 1996. Os Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais e o Ensino Fundamental. In Revista Brasileira de Educação, 2(2), p. 4-17.
Delanty, G. 2000. Citizenship in a global age: Society, culture, politics. New York: Open University Press.
Fávero, O., Horta, J., & Frigotto, G. 1992. Políticas Educacionais no Brasil: desafios e propostas. In Caderno de Pesquisa de São Paulo, 83, p. 5-14, nov.
Forman, R. 2014. How local teachers respond to the culture and language of a global English as a Foreign Language textbook. In Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(1), p. 72-88.
Foucault, M. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.
Fullan, M. 2007. The New Meaning of Educational Change (4th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
García, O. 2012. Ethnic identity and language policy. In B. Spolsky (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of language policy (p. 79-99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gray, J. 2010. The construction of English Culture, Consumerism and Promotion in the ELT Global Coursebook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Guilherme, M. 2014. ‘Glocal’ Languages and North-South Epistemologies. In A. Teodoro & M. Guilherme (Eds.). European and Latin American Higher Education Between Mirrors (p. 55-74). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Jernudd, B. & Nekvapil, J. 2012. History of the field: a sketch. In B. Spolsky (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of language policy (p. 16-36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, R. & Baldauf, Jr, R. B. 1997. Language planning from practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Kramsch, C. 2005. Post 9/11: Foreign languages between knowledge and power. In Applied Linguistics, 26, p. 545-567.
Kramsch, C. 2014. Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. In: Modern Language Journal, 98(1), p. 296-311.
Kroskrity, P. V. 2000. Regimenting Languages. In: P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.). Regimes of language: ideologies, polities, and identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Kumaravadivelu, B. 2006. Understanding language teaching: from method to postmethod. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Liddicoat, A. 2013. Language-in-education Policies: The Discursive Construction of Intercultural Relations. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Marsh, C. 2004. Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum. London: Routledge Falmer.
Mickan, P. 2013. Language Curriculum Design and Socialisation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Moore, R. 2000. For Knowledge: Tradition, progressivism and progress in education—reconstructing the curriculum debate. In Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), p. 17-36.
Nation, I. S. P. & Macalister, J. 2010. Language Curriculum Design. London: Routledge.
Nudzor, H. P. 2009. Re-conceptualising the paradox in policy implementation: a postmodernist conceptual approach. In Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 30(4), p. 501-513.
Nunan, D. 1988. Syllabus Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nunan, D. 2004. Task-based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ozga, J. & Jones, R. 2006. Travelling and embedded policy: the case of knowledge transfer. In: Journal of Education Policy, 21(1), p. 1-17.
Rajaee Nia, M., Abbaspour, E., & Zare, J. 2012. A critical review of recent trends in second language syllabus design and curriculum development. In: International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(2), p. 63-82.
Richards, J. C. 2001a. From Syllabus Design to Curriculum Development. In Curriculum Development in Language Teaching (p. 23-50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. 2001b. The Origins of Language Curriculum Development. In Curriculum Development in Language Teaching (p. 1-22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. 2001c. The Role and Design of Instructional Materials. In Curriculum Development in Language Teaching (p. 251-285). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shohamy, E. 2006. Language policy: Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. London: Routledge.
Shohamy, E., Donitsa-schmidt, S., & Ferman, I. 1996. Test impact revisited: washback effect over time. In: Language Testing, 13, p. 298-317.
Sonntag, S. K. 1995. Elite competition and official language movements. In J. Tollefson, (Ed.). Power and Inequality in Language Education (p. 91-111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spolsky, B. 2004. Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, J. B. 1990. Ideology and Modern Culture: critical social theory in the era of mass communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Tollefson, J. 1981. The Role of Language Planning in Second Language Acquisition. In: Language Learning, 31(2), p. 337-348.
Tollefson, J. 1993. Language policy and power: Yugoslavia, the Philippines, and Southeast Asian refugees in the United States. In: International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 103(1), p. 73-95.
Wait, J. L. Van Der, 1990. Theory and practice in second language syllabus design. In: Per Linguam, 6(1), p. 71-80.
Walter, S. L. & Benson, C., 2012. Language policy and medium of instruction in formal education. In: B. Spolsky, ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 278-300.
Wilkins, D. A. 1976. Notional Syllabus. London: Oxford University Press.
Copyright (c) 2018 BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite BELT - Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal as the site of original publication.
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise specified, material published in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is correctly cited.