Retentive strength evaluation of resin cements in two-piece zirconia abutments

Authors

  • Gabriel Pinheiro Lacerda University of Juiz de Fora http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3714-5580
  • Rodrigo Furtado de Carvalho University of Juiz de Fora
  • João Paulo Da Silva Sudré University of Juiz de Fora
  • Maria das Graças Afonso de Miranda Chaves University of Juiz de Fora
  • Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Leite University of Juiz de Fora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6523.2017.3.26833

Keywords:

ceramics, luting agents, dental implants, tensile strength.

Abstract

Objective : To evaluate, in vitro, the retentive strength between the two-piece zircônia abutments, comparing different types of resin cements.
Methods: Thirty zirconia parts manufactured by CAD-CAM technology were divided into three groups, according to the resin cement used for their cementation on the metallic titanium bases: dual-curing self-adhesive, dual-curing conventional and chemically activated. The specimens were stored in distilled water (24 hours, 37°C), followed by thermocycling and submitted to 30 s in baths of 5°C and 55°C, 2 s displacement time, with 6,000 cycles. The mechanical cycling tests were
carried out with specimens submerse in distilled water (37°C), with load of 100N, 2 H z frequency and 200,000 cycles. After thermomechanical tests, the specimens were submitted to a tensile test using a universal testing device until the complete separation of, which were analyzed in stereomicroscope, to determine the cementation failure pattern.
Results : The adhesive-type cementation failure occurred in all specimens. The retentive strength values did not differ statistically between the groups.
Conclusion : All three tested resin cements provided enough retentive to the two-piece zirconia abutments.

 

Author Biography

Gabriel Pinheiro Lacerda, University of Juiz de Fora

Departamento de Clínica de Odontológica

References

Kolgeci L, Mericske E, Worni A, Walker P, Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R. Technical complications and failures of zirconia-based prostheses supported by implants followed up to 7 years: a case series. Int J Prosthodont 2014;27(6):544-52. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3807

Novais VR, Lopes C de C, Rodrigues RB, Silva AL, Simamoto Júnior PC, Soares CJ. Degree of Conversion and Mechanical Properties of Resin Cements Cured Through Different All-Ceramic Systems. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(5):484-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300180

Zembic A, Bosch A, Jung RE, Hammerle CH, Sailer I. Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canineand posterior regions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24(4):384-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12044

Chun HJ, Yeo IS, Lee JH, Kim SK, Heo SJ, Koak JY, et al. Fracture strength study of internally connected zirconia abutments reinforced with titanium inserts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30(2):346-50. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3768

Carvalho MA, Sotto-Maior BS, Del Bel Cury AA, Pessanha Henriques GE. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(5): 1096-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.015

Kim JS, Raigrodski AJ, Flinn BD, Rubenstein JE, Chung KH, Mancl LA. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109(4):255-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60054-2

da Silva EM, Miragaya L, Sabrosa CE, Maia LC. Stability of the bond

between two resin cements and an yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramic after six months of aging in water. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(3):568-75. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.003

Gehrke P, Alius J, Fischer C, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F. Retentive strength of twopiece CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutments. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16(6):920-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12060

Blatz MB. Long-term clinical success of allceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 2002;33(6):415-26.

Valentino TA, Borges GA, Borges LH, Vishal J, Martins LR, Correr-

Sobrinho L. Dual resin cement knoop hardness after different activation modes through dental ceramics. Braz Dent J. 2010;21(2):104-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402010000200003

Qeblawi DM, Campillo-Funollet M, Muñoz CA. In vitro shear bond strength of two self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113(2):122-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.08.006

Liu Q, Meng X, Yoshida K, Luo X. Bond degradation behavior of selfadhesive cement and conventional resin cements bonded to silanized ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105(3):177-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60026-7

Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E, Wrbas KT. Water sorption and solubility of four selfetching, self-adhesive resin luting agents. J Adhes Dent 2010;12(1):39-43.

Amaral M, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, Souza RO. Low-temperature

degradation of a failure cementation-TZP ceramic after surface treatments. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013;101(8):1387-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32957

Cattani Lorente M, Scherrer SS, Richard J, Demellayer R, Amez-Droz M, Wiskott. Failure cementation. Surface roughness and EDS characterization of a failure cementation-TZP dental ceramic treated with the CoJetTM Sand. Dent Mater 2010;26(11):1035-1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.06.005

de Souza G, Hennig D, Aggarwal A, Tam LE. The use of MDP-based

materials for retentive to zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(4):859-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.016

Wegner SM, Gerdes W, Kern M. Effect of different artificial aging conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15(3): 267-2.

Castro HL, Corazza PH, Paes-Júnior TA, Della Bona A. Influence of

Y-TZP ceramic treatment and different resin cements on bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater 2012;28(11):1191-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.003

Morresi AL, D’Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D’Arcangelo C, et al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013;29:295-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.013

Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2004;71(2):381-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30097

Att W, Grigoriadou M, Strub JR. ZrO2 three-unit fixed partial dentures: comparison of failure load before and after exposure to a mastication simulator. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34(4):282-90.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01705.x

Kelly JR. Perspectives on strength. Dent Mater. 1995;11(2):103-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80043-3

Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81(6):652-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70103-4

OyagüE RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M, Osorio R.

Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on retentive to densely-sintered zirconium-oxide ceramic. Dent Mater. 2009a;25(2): 172-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.012

Downloads

Published

2018-03-23

Issue

Section

Original Article