Avaliação clínica de restaurações de resina condensável após dois anos
Abstract
O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a performance clínica de uma resina condensável, comparada com uma resina microhíbrida e amálgama em restaurações de dentes posteriores após dois anos. Foram confeccionadas 33 restaurações de Classes I e II, em 6 pacientes, alunos da FOUFPel. Cada paciente deveria apresentar, no mínimo, uma restauração de cada material, que seriam aleatoriamente distribuídas. Os critérios para avaliação clínica (USPHS modificado – amálgama e USPHS adaptado – restaurações de resina) foram utilizados. As restaurações foram classificadas como clinicamente satisfatórias (Alfa & Bravo) e insatisfatórias (Charlie & Delta). A análise estatística foi realizada através dos testes de Friedman e de Kruskal-Wallis. Não foram encontradas diferenças significativas entre os tempos investigados nem entre os materiais testados (p > 0,05). Conclui-se que a maioria das restaurações encontravam-se clinicamente aceitáveis após 2 anos de avaliação clínica.
UNITERMOS: resinas condensáveis; avaliação clínica; dentes posteriores.
SUMMARY
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance of condensable composite with a micro hybrid composite and amalgam used in posterior restorations, after two years. Thirty three class I and II cavities were performed in 6 patients. Each patient should receive al least one restoration with each material, which were randomly assigned. The clinical examination was based on USPHS modified criteria for amalgam and USPHS adapted criteria for composite. The restorations were classified in clinically satisfactory (Alfa & Bravo) and clinically unsatisfactory (Charlie & Delta). Statistical analysis using Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference for times and materials investigated (p > 0.05). The majority of the restorations presented satisfactory performance after two-year follow-up.
UNITERMS: condensable composites; clinical evaluation; posterior teeth.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
COPYRIGHT
The submission of originals to Odonto Ciência implies the transfer by the authors of the right for publication. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication. If the authors wish to include the same data into another publication, they must cite Odonto Ciência as the site of original publication.
CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE
As this journal is open access, the articles are allowed free use in scientific and educational applications, with citation of the source.
According to the type of Creative Commons License (CC-BY 4.0) adopted by Odonto Ciência, the user must respect the requirements below.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
However, only under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests Odonto Ciência endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
For more details on the Creative Commons license, please follow the link in the footer of this website.
