É a modularidade massiva um programa de pesquisa empiricamente progressivo?

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2019.3.34192

Palavras-chave:

Modularismo, Cognição, Psicologia evolucionária, Lakatos

Resumo

A modularidade massiva pode ser descrita como um programa de pesquisa, nos termos da filosofia da ciência de Lakatos. Cumpre, para tanto, identificar o núcleo, mostrar evidências de que ele é assumido como infalsificável (heurística negativa) e examinar estratégias de articulação e sofisticação do cinto de proteção (heurística positiva). No presente trabalho, faço isso com o intuito de responder à pergunta lançada no título. Em atenção a três desenvolvimentos recentes, cujas predições encontraram corroboração empírica, sou levado a inferir que esse programa é, de fato, empiricamente progressivo.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

César Fernando Meurer, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.

Doutor em Filosofia pela Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (2016). Postdoctoral Visiting Scholar junto ao Departamento de Filosofia da Università Degli Studi di Milano (2017- 2018). Pós-doutorando (PNPD/Capes) junto ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia da Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU).

Referências

AL-SHAWAF, L.; LEWIS, D.; BUSS, D. Disgust and mating strategy. Evolution & Human Behavior, [S. l.], v. 36, n. 3, p. 199-205, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.11.003

BARRETT, H. Modules in the flesh. In: GANGESTAD, S.; SIMPSON, J. (ed.) The evolution of mind: fundamental questions and controversies. New York: Guilford Press, 2007. p. 161-170.

BERGHE, P.; FROST, P. Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: a case of gene culture co-evolution? Ethnic and Racial Studies, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 87-113, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.1986.9993516

BJORKLUND, D. In search of a metatheory for cognitive development (or, Piaget is dead and I don’t feel so good myself.) Child Development, [S. l.], v. 68, n. 1, p. 144-148, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1997.tb01932.x

BROWN, R. What evolvability really is. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, [S. l.], v. 65, n. 03, p. 549-572, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axt014

BUSS, D. Mate preference mechanisms: consequences for partner choice and intrasexual competition. In: BARKOW, J.; COSMIDES, L.; TOOBY, J. (ed.) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. p. 249-266.

BUSS, D. The evolution of desire: strategies of human mating. 3. ed. Revised and updated. New York: Basic Books, 2016.

BUSS. D. Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind. 3. ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2008.

CAIN, M. J. Fodor: language, mind and philosophy. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press; Blackwell, 2002.

CAMPOS, L.; OTTA, E.; SIQUEIRA, J. Sex differences in mate selection strategies: content analyses and responses to personal advertisements in Brazil. Evolution and Human Behavior, [S. l.], v. 23, n. 2, p. 395-406, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00099-5

CARRUTHERS, P. On Fodor-fixation, flexibility and human uniqueness.

Mind and Language, [S. l.], v. 23, n. 3, p. 293-303, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.00344.x

CARRUTHERS, P. The architecture of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207077.001.0001

CHAPMAN, H.; ANDERSON, A. Trait physical disgust is related to moral

judgments outside of the purity domain. Emotion, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 2, 341-348, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035120

COSMIDES L.; TOOBY, J. Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In: BARKOW, J.; COSMIDES, L.; TOOBY, J. (ed.). The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. p. 163-228.

COSMIDES, L.; TOOBY, J. Origins of domain specificity: the evolution of functional organization. In: HIRSCHFELD, L.; GELMAN, S. (ed.). Mapping the mind: domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. p. 85-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752902.005

COSMIDES, L.; TOOBY, J.; BARKOW, J. Introduction: evolutionary psychology and conceptual integration. In: BARKOW, J.; COSMIDES, L.; TOOBY, J. (ed.). The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. p. 03-18.

CURTIS, V.; BARRA, M.; AUNGER, R. Disgust as an adaptive system for disease avoidance behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, [S. l.], v. 366, n. 1563, p. 389-401, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0117

DAVEY, G. Disgust: the disease-avoidance emotion and its dysfunctions.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, [S. l.], v. 366, n. 1583, p. 3453-3465, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0039

ERAñA, A. Dual process theories versus massive modularity hypotheses.

Philosophical Psychology, [S. l.], v. 25, n. 6, p. 855-872, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.631994

ERMER, E.; GUERIN, S.; COSMIDES, L.; TOOBY, J.; MILLER, M. Theory of mind broad and narrow: reasoning about social exchange engages ToM areas, precautionary reasoning does not. Social Neuroscience, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 3-4, p. 196-219, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910600989771

ESKINE, K.; KACINIK, N.; PRINZ, J. A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, [S. l.], v. 22, n. 3, p. 295-299, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611398497

EVANS, J.; NEWSTEAD, S.; BYRNE, R. Human reasoning: the psychology of deduction: Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd., 1993.

FESSLER, D.; NAVARRETE, D. Domain-specific variation in disgust sensitivity across the menstrual cycle. Evolution and Human Behavior, [S. l.], v. 24, n. 6, p. 406-417, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00054-0

FISHER, T. Gender roles and pressure to be truthful: the bogus pipeline modifies gender differences in sexual but not non-sexual behavior. Sex Roles, [S. l.], v. 68, n. 7-8, p. 401-414, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0266-3

FODOR, J. The mind doesn’t work that way. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4627.001.0001

FODOR, J. The modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001

FORSTER, M. Prediction. In: CURD, M.; PSILLOS, S. (ed.) The Routledge companion to philosophy of science. 2. ed. London; New York: Routledge, 2014. p. 449-457.

FRASER, H. Modularity and evolutionary constraint on proteins. Nature Genetics, [S. l.], v. 37, n. 4, p. 351-352, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1530

GALLISTEL, C. The replacement of general-purpose learning models with adaptively specialized learning modules. In: GAZZANIGA, M. (ed.) The cognitive neurosciences. 2. ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000. p. 1179-1191.

GOLDBERG, L. A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In: MERVIELDE, I.; DEARY, I.; DE FRUYT, F.; OSTENDORF, F. (ed.) Personality psychology in Europe.Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1999. p. 07-28.

GREENLESS, I.; McGREW, W. Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: analysis of published advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology, [S. l.], v. 15, n. 2, p. 59-72, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(94)90017-5

HAN, J.; BERTIN, N.; HAO, T.; GOLDBERG, D.; BERRIZ, G.; ZHANG, L.; DUPUY, D.; WALHOUT, A.; CUSICK, M.; ROTH, F.; VIDAL, M. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature, [S. l.], v. 430, p. 88-93, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02555

HARRIS, P.; NÚÑEZ, M.; BRETT, C. Let’s swap: early understanding of social exchange by British and Nepali children. Memory & Cognition, [S. l.], v. 29, n. 5, p. 757-764, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200478

HARTWELL, L.; HOPFIELD, J.; LEIBLER, S.; MURRAY, A. From molecular to modular cell in biology. Nature, [S. l.], v. 402, C47-C52, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35011540

HAVLICEK, J.; DVORAKOVA, R.; BARTOS, L.; FLEGR, J. Non-advertised does not mean concealed: body odour changes across the human menstrual cycle. Ethology, [S. l.], v. 112, n. 1, p. 81-90, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01125.x

HAVLICEK, J.; ROBERTS, S.; FLEGR, J. Women’s preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters, [S. l.], v. 1, p. 256-259, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0332

HE, J.; DEEM, M. Hierarchical evolution of animal body plans. Developmental Biology, [S. l.], v. 337, n. 1, p. 157-161, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.09.038

HILLS, T. Animal foraging and the evolution of goal-directed cognition.

Cognitive Science, [S. l.], v. 30, n. 01, p. 03-41, 2006.

JOHNSTON, V.; HAGEL, R.; FRANKLIN, M.; FINK, B.; GRAMMER, K. Male facial attractiveness: evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, [S. l.], v. 22, n. 4, p. 251-267, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00066-6

KELLY, D. Yuck: the nature and moral significance of disgust. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8303.001.0001

KENNAIR, L. Challenging design: how best to account for the world as

it really is. Zygon, [S. l.], v. 38, n. 3, p. 543-558, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9744.00520

KITANO, H. Biological robustness. Nature Reviews Genetics, [S. l.], v. 5, p.826-837, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1471

KITANO, H. Towards a theory of biological robustness. Molecular Systems Biology, [S. l.], v. 137, n. 3, p. 01-07, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100179

KLINGENBERG, C. Morphological integration and developmental modularity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, [S. l.], v. 39, p. 115-132, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110054

KRAUSE, A.; FRANK, K.; MASON, D.; ULANOWICZ, R.; TAYLOR, W.

Compartments revealed in food-web structure. Nature, [S. l.], v. 426, p.

-285, 2003. LAKATOS, I. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In: LAKATOS, I.; MUSGRAVE, A. (ed.) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. p. 91-195. [LAKATOS, I. O falseamento e a metodologia dos programas de pesquisa científica. In: LAKATOS, I.; MUSGRAVE, A. (org.) A crítica e o desenvolvimento do conhecimento. Tradução de Octavio Mendes Cajado. São Paulo: Cultrix; Editora da USP, 1979. p. 109-243.]

LAKATOS, I. History of science and its rational reconstructions. In: BUCK, C.; COHEN, R. (ed.) Boston studies in the philosophy of science.. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1971. v. 28, p. 91-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_7

LITVIN, O.; CAUSTON, H.; CHEN, B.; PEER, D. Modularity and interactions in the genetics of gene expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, v. 106, n. 16, p. 6441-6446, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0810208106

LORENZ, D.; JENG, A.; DEEN, M. The emergence of modularity in biological systems. Physics of Life Reviews, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 129-160, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2011.02.003

MEURER, C. F. Sobre a viabilidade computacional de uma arquitetura cognitiva não-modular. Cognitio-Estudos, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 1, p. 55-73, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23925/1809-8428.2017v14i1p55-73

MONTOYA, J.; PIMM, S.; SOLÉ, R. Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature, [S. l.], v. 442, p. 259-264, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04927

NEWELL, A. Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.

NEYS, W. Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing in reasoning: chronometric and dual task considerations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, [S. l.], v. 59, n. 6, p. 1070-1100, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980543000123

OATEN, M.; STEVENSON, R.; CASE, T. Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, [S. l.], v. 135, n. 2, p. 303-321, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014823

PAWLOWSKI, B.; DUNBAR, R. Impact of market value on human mate choice decisions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, [S. l.], v. 266, n. 1416, p. 281-285, 1999. (1999a). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0634

PAWLOWSKI, B.; DUNBAR, R. Withholding age as putative deception in mate search tactics. Evolution and Human Behavior, [S. l.], v. 20, n. 1, p. 53-69, 1999. (1999b). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00038-5

PENTON-VOAK, I.; PERRETT, D. Female preference for male faces changes cyclically: further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior, [S. l.], v. 21, n. 1, p. 39-49, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00033-1

PINKER, S. How the mind works. London; New York: Penguin Books, 1997.

PUTNAM, H. The ‘corroboration’ of theories. In: SCHILPP, P. (ed.) The philosophy of Karl Popper. La Salle, IL: Open Court Publishing Co., 1974. p. 221-240.

REGNER, A. C. P. Feyerabend/Lakatos: adeus à razão ou construção de uma nova racionalidade? In: PORTOCARRERO, V. (org.) Filosofia, história e sociologia das ciências 1: abordagens contemporâneas. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz, 1994. p. 103-131. Acessível em: http://books.scielo.org/id/rnn6q/pdf/portocarrero-9788575414095-06.pdf

SAMUELS, R. Is the human mind massively modular? In: STAINTON, R. (ed.) Contemporary debates in cognitive science. New York: Blackwell, 2006. p. 37-56.

SCHLOSSER, G.; WAGNER, G. Modularity in development and evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.

SHERLOCK, J.; ZIETSCH, B.; TYBUR, J.; JERN, P. The quantitative genetics of disgust sensibility. Emotion, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 1, p. 43-51, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000101

SOHN, K. Men’s revealed preference for their mates’ ages. Evolution and Human Behavior, [S. l.], v. 38, n. 1, p. 58-62, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.06.007

SPERBER, D. Explaining culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.

SPIRIN, V.; GELFAND, M.; MIRONOV, A.; MIRNY, L. A metabolic network in the evolutionary context: multiscale structure and modularity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, v. 103, n. 23, p. 7500-7505, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510258103

SUGIYAMA, L.; TOOBY, J.; COSMIDES, L. Cross-cultural evidence of cognitive adaptations for social exchange among the Shiwiar of Ecuadorian amazonia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 99, n. 17, p. 11537-11542, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122352999

SYMONS, D. Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: the evolutionary psychology of the human female sexual attractiveness. In: ABRAMSON, P.; PINKERTON, S. (ed.) Sexual nature / sexual culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1995. p. 80-118.

THIEFFRY, D.; SÁNCHEZ, L. Qualitative analysis of gene networks: toward the delineation of cross-regulatory modules. In: SCHLOSSER, G.; WAGNER, G. (ed.) Modularity in development and evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004. p. 222-243.

THORNTON, A.; CLAYTON, N.; GRODZINSKI, U. Animal minds: from computation to evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, London, v. 367, n. 1603, p. 2670-2676, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0270

TOOBY, J.; COSMIDES, L. On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: the role of genetics and adaptation. Journal of Personality, [S. l.], v. 58, n. 1, p. 17-64, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00907.x

TOOBY, J.; COSMIDES, L. The psychological foundations of culture. In: BARKOW, J.; COSMIDES, L.; TOOBY, J. (ed.). The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology nd the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. p. 19-136.

TYBUR, J.; INBAR, Y.; GULER, E.; MOLHO, C. Is the relationship between pathogen avoidance and ideological conservatism explained by sexual strategies? Evolution and Human Behavior, [S. l.], v. 36, n. 6, p. 489-497, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.01.006

TYBUR, J.; LIEBERMAN, D.; GRISKEVICIUS, V. Microbes, mating, and morality: individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, [S. l.], v. 97, n. 1, p. 103 122, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015474

TYBUR, J.; LIEBERMAN, D.; KURZBAN, R.; DESCIOLI, P. Disgust: evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, Washington, v. 120, n. 1, p. 65- 84, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030778

VAN LIER, J.; REVLIN, R.; DE NEIS, W. Detecting cheaters without thinking: testing the automaticity of the cheater detection module. PlosOne, v. 8, n. 1, p. e53827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053827

WAGNER, G. Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. American Zoology, v. 36, n. 1, p. 36-43, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/36.1.36

Downloads

Publicado

2019-12-31

Como Citar

Meurer, C. F. (2019). É a modularidade massiva um programa de pesquisa empiricamente progressivo?. Veritas (Porto Alegre), 64(3), e34192. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2019.3.34192