Effect size: a statistical basis for clinical practice

José Valladares-Neto

Abstract


OBJECTIVE: Effect size (ES) is the statistical measure which quantifies the strength of a phenomenon and is commonly applied to observational and interventional studies. The aim of this review was to describe the conceptual basis of this measure, including its application, calculation and interpretation.
RESULTS: As well as being used to detect the magnitude of the difference between groups, to verify the strength of association between predictor and outcome variables, to calculate sample size and power, ES is also used in meta-analysis. ES formulas can be divided into these categories: I – Difference between groups, II – Strength of association, III – Risk estimation, and IV – Multivariate data. The d value was originally considered small (0.20 > d ≤ 0.49), medium (0.50 > d≤ 0.79) or large (d ≥ 0.80); however, these cut-off limits are not consensual and could be contextualized according to a specific field of knowledge. In general, a larger score implies that a larger difference was detected.
CONCLUSION: The ES report, in conjunction with the confidence interval and P value, aims to strengthen interpretation and prevent the misinterpretation of data, and thus leads to clinical decisions being based on scientific evidence studies.


Keywords


effect size; P value; statistical interpretation; clinical decision-making; clinical effectiveness.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2th ed. Ney Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum; 1988.

Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size – or why the p value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ 2012;4:279-282.

https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1

Altman DG, Bland JM. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ 1995;311:485.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7003.485

Cohen J. The earth is round (p<.05). Ame Psychol 1994;49:997-1003.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997

Johnson D. The insignificance of statistical significance testing. J Wildl Manage 1999;63:763-72.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3802789

Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA’s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat 2016;70:129-33.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108

Ferguson CJ. An (ES) primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof Psychol Res 2009;40:532-8.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808

Kirk RE. Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educ Psychol Meas1996;56:746-59.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056005002

Pandis N. The effect size. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142: 739-40.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.06.011

Espírito-Santo H, Daniel F. Calculating and reporting effect sizes on scientific papers (1): p < 0.05 limitations in the analysis of mean differences of two groups. RPICS 2015;1:3-16.

Khalilzadeh J, Tasci ADA. Large sample size, significance level, and the effect size: Solutions to perils of using big data for academic research. Tour Manag 2017;62:89-96.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.03.026

Ferrari R, Caram LMO, Garcia T, Paiva SAR, Vale AS, Tanni SE. Effect size. Pneumol Paul 2016;29:73-4.

Fritz CO, Morris PE, Richler JJ. (ES) estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. J Exp Psychol Gen 2012;141:2-18.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024338

Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC. effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2007;82:591-605.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x

Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Delineando a pesquisa clínica. 4th ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2015.

Bakker M, Dijk AV, Wicherts JM. The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspect Psychol Sci 2012;7:543-54.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459060

Anderson SF, Kelley K, Maxwell SE. Sample-size planning for more accurate statistical power: A method adjusting sample effect sizes for publication bias and uncertainty. Psychol Sci 2017;28:1547-62.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617723724

Bradley MT, Brand A. Alpha values as a function of sample size, effect size, and power: accuracy over inference. Psychol Rep 2013;112:835-44.

https://doi.org/10.2466/03.49.PR0.112.3.835-844

Tomczak M, Tomczak E. The need to report effect size estimates revisited. An overview of some recommended measures of effect size. TSS 2014; 1:19-25.

Greenland S, Senn SJ, Rothman KJ, Carlin JB, Poole C, Goodman SN, et al. Statistical tests, p values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. Eur J Epidemiol 2016;31 337-50.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3

Hedges LV. Distributional theory for Glass´s estimator of effect size and related estimators. J Educ Behav Stat 1981;6:107-28.

https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986006002107

Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res 1976;5:3-8.

https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003

Lalongo C. Understanding the effect size and its measures. Biochem Med 2016;26:150-63.

https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2016.015

Levine TR, Hullett CR. Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect size in communication research. Hum Commun Res 2002;28: 612-25.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00828.x

Bakeman R. Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods 2005;37:379-84.

https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192707

Espírito-Santo H, Daniel F. Calculating and reporting effect sizes on scientific papers (2): Guide to report the strength of relationships. RPICS 2017;1:53-64.

Maher JM, Markey, CM, Ebert-May D. The other half of the story: effect size analysis in quantitative research. CBE-Life Sci Educ 2013;12:345-51.

https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-04-0082

Selya AS, Rose JS, Dierker LC, Hedeker D, Mermelstein RJ. A practical guide to calculation Cohen’s f2, a measure of local effect size, from PROC MIXED. Front Psychol 2012;3:1-6.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00111

McHugh ML. The odds ratio: calculation, usage, and interpretation. Biochem Med 2009;19:120-6.

https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2009.011

Téllez A, García CH, Corral-Verdugo V. Effect size, confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research. Psychol Russia 2015;8:27-47.

https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2015.0303

Nyirongo VB, Mukaka MM, Kalilani-Phiri LV. Statistical pitfalls in medical research. Malawi Med J 2008;20:15-18.

https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v20i1.10949




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/1980-6523.2018.1.29437

e-ISSN: 1980-6523

ISSN-L: 0102-9460

 

This journal is a member of, and subscribes to the principles of, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) http://www.publicationethics.org


SJR (SCImago Journal & Country Rank) IMPACT FACTOR:

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Licença Creative Commons

Except where otherwise noted, content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

 

Editorial Policies of Brazilian Scientific Journals. Deposit availability: Blue .

 

Copyright: © 2006-2019 EDIPUCRS