The corporate capture of sustainable development and its transformation into a ‘good Anthropocene’ historical bloc

Leslie Sklair

Resumo


Inspired by Antonio Gramsci’s analysis of bourgeois hegemony and his theoretical formulation of historical blocs, this paper attempts to explain how the concept and practice of sustainable development were captured by corporate interests in the last few decades of the twentieth century and how they were transformed into what we can name a ‘good Anthropocene’ historical bloc at the beginning of the twentyfirst century. This corporate capture is theorised in terms of the transnational capitalist class as represented by corporate, statist/political, professional and consumerist fractions operating at all levels of an increasingly globalising world. In this essay, I propose the term ‘critical Anthropocene narrative’, highlighting the dangers posed by the Anthropocene and the need for radical systems’ change entailing the end of capitalism and the hierarchical state. The critical Anthropocene narrative, thus, stands in radical opposition to the ‘good Anthropocene’ narrative which I argue was invented as a strategy to defend the socio-economic status quo by the proponents of sustainable development and their successors in the Anthropocene era, despite the good intentions of many environmentalists working in corporations, governments, NGOs, and international organizations. The paper concludes with some suggestions on how to deal with the potential existential threats to the survival of humanity.

 

*** A captura corporativa do desenvolvimento sustentável e sua transformação em um bloco histórico do “bom antropoceno” ***

Inspirado na análise da hegemonia burguesa de Antonio Gramsci e sua formulação teórica de blocos históricos, este artigo tenta explicar como o conceito e a prática do desenvolvimento sustentável foram capturados pelos interesses corporativos nas últimas décadas do século 20 e como eles foram transformados em que podemos nomear um bloco histórico “bom antropoceno” no início do século 21. Essa captura corporativa é teorizada em termos da classe capitalista transnacional representada por frações corporativas, estatistas/políticas, profissionais e consumistas que operam em todos os níveis de um mundo cada vez mais globalizado. Neste ensaio proponho o termo “narrativa crítica do Antropoceno”, destacando os perigos colocados pelo Antropoceno e a necessidade de mudanças sistêmicas radicais que implicam no fim do capitalismo e do estado hierárquico. A narrativa crítica do Antropoceno, portanto, opõe-se radicalmente à narrativa do “bom Antropoceno” que, segundo argumento, foi inventada como uma estratégia para defender o status quo socioeconômico pelos proponentes do desenvolvimento sustentável e seus sucessores na era do Antropoceno, apesar das boas intenções de muitos ambientalistas que trabalham em corporações, governos, ONGs e organizações internacionais. O artigo conclui com algumas sugestões sobre como lidar com as possíveis ameaças existenciais à sobrevivência da humanidade. 

Palavras-chave: Desenvolvimento sustentável. O Antropoceno. Blocos históricos. Captura corporativa. Classe capitalista transnacional.


Palavras-chave


Sustainable development. The Anthropocene. Historical blocs. Corporate capture. Transnational capitalist class.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


ANGUS, I. Facing the Anthropocene: fossil capitalism and the crisis of the earth system. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2016.

BERNSTEIN, S. The compromise of liberal environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.

https://doi.org/10.7312/bern12036

BOOTHMAN, D. Gramsci’s historical bloc: structure, hegemony and dialectical interactions. Movimento, Niteroi, v. 4, n. 6, p. 131-150, 2017.

https://doi.org/10.22409/mov.v0i6.362

BURTON, M.; SOMERVILLE, P. Degrowth: a defence. New Left Review, London, v. 115, p. 95-104, 2019.

CASSEGÅRD, C. Eco-Marxism and the critical theory of nature: two perspectives on ecology and dialectics. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, [S. l.], v. 18, n. 3, p. 314-332, 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910x.2017.1324502

CEBALLOS, G.; EHRLICH, P.; DIRZO, R. Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704949114

CRUTZEN, P. Geology of mankind. Nature, v. 415, n. 6867, p. 23, 2002.

https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a.

DALBY, S. Framing the Anthropocene: the good, the bad and the ugly. The Anthropocene Review, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 2, p. 102-106, 2016.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019615618681

D’ALISA, G.; DEMARIA, F.; KALLIS, G. (ed.) Degrowth: a vocabulary for a new era. London: Routledge, 2014.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203796146

ELLIS, E. Anthropocene: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198792987.001.0001

FOSTER, J. B. Marxism in the Anthropocene: dialectical rifts on the left. International Critical Thought. v. 6, n. 3, p. 393-421, 2016.

https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2016.1197787

GOODMAN, D.; DUPOIS, M.; GOODMAN, M. Alternative food networks: knowledge, practice, and politics. New York: Routledge, 2012.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203804520

GORE, A. Rachel Carson and Silent Spring. In: Peter Matthiessen (ed.). Courage for the Earth. New York: Houghton, 2007. p. 63-78.

GREENO, J. (ed.). Making business sense of sustainable development. Cambridge, MA: Arthur D. Little, 1998.

GREER, J.; BRUNO, K. Greenwash: the reality behind corporate environmentalism. Penang: Third World Network, 1996.

HAJER, M. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

HAMILTON, C. Getting the Anthropocene so wrong. The Anthropocene Review. [S. l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 33-51, 2015.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019615618681

HAMILTON, C.; BONNEUIL, C.; Gemenne, F. (eds.) The Anthropocene and global environmental crisis: rethinking modernity in a new epoch. London: Routledge, 2015.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743424-1

HARAWAY, D. Staying with the trouble: Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene. In: MOORE, J. (ed.). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history and the crisis of capitalism. Oakland CA: PM Press, 2016. p. 34-76.

https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780-005

HOLZER, B. Moralizing the corporation: transnational activism and corporate accountability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010.

https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806817

HORNBORG, A. Artifacts have consequences, not agency: toward a critical theory of global environmental history. European Journal of Social Theory, London, v. 20, n. 1, p. 95-110, 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016640536

JAGODZINSKI, J. (ed.) Interrogating the Anthropocene: ecology, aesthetics, pedagogy, and the future in question. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78747-3

JØRGENSEN, F.; JØRGENSEN, D. The Anthropocene as a history of technology: “Welcome to the Anthropocene”. Technology and Culture, Chicago, v. 57, n. 1, p. 231-237, 2016.

https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2016.0026

KLEIN, N. This changes everything: capitalism vs the climate. London: Penguin, 2014.

LATOUR, B. Telling friends from foes in the time of the Anthropocene. In: HAMILTON, C.; BONNEUIL, C.; GEMENNE, F. (ed.). The Anthropocene and global environmental crisis: rethinking modernity in a new epoch. London: Routledge, 2015. p. 145-155.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743424-12

LOCHER, F.; FRESSOZ, J.-B. Modernity’s frail climate: a climate history of environmental reflexivity. Critical Inquiry, Chicago, v. 38, n. 3, p. 579-598, 2012.

https://doi.org/10.1086/664552

LORIMER, J. The Anthropo-scene: a guide for the perplexed. Social Studies of Science, London, v. 47, n. 1, p. 117-142, 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716671039

MALM, A. Fossil capitalism: the rise of steam power and the roots of global warming. London: Verso, 2016.

MARINELLI, M. How to build a “beautiful China” in the Anthropocene: the political discourse and the intellectual debate on ecological civilization. Journal of Chinese Political Science, [S. l.], v. 23, n. 3, p. 365-386, 2018.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-018-9538-7

MEADOWS, D. H.; MEADOWS, D. L.; RANDERS, J.; BEHRENS, W. The limits to growth. New York: New American Library, 1972.

MOORE, J. (ed.). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, history and the crisis of capitalism. Oakland CA: PM Press, 2016.

NEWELL, P. Globalization and the environment: capitalism, ecology and power. Cambridge: Polity, 2012.

NEWELL, P.; PATERSON, M. Climate capitalism: global warming and the transformation of the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511761850

ORESKES, N.; CONWAY, E. Merchants of doubt: how a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. London: Bloomsbury, 2010.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-011-9639-9

ORESKES, N.; CONWAY, E. The collapse of Western civilization. A view from the future. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.

https://doi.org/10.7312/columbia/9780231169547.001.0001

RAWORTH, K. Must the Anthropocene be a Manthropocene? The Guardian, 2014.

Available: theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/20/anthropocene-workinggroup-science-gender-bias.

RICH, B. Mortgaging the Earth: The World Bank, environmental improvement and the crisis of development. London: Earthscan, 1994.

ROBIN, L.; MUIR, C. Slamming the Anthropocene: performing climate change in museums (reCollections). 2015.

Available: https://umaincertaantropologia.org/2015/05/02/slamming-the-anthropocene-performing-climate-change-inmuseums-recollections/.

ROBBINS, P. T. Greening the corporation: management strategy and the environmental challenge. London: Earthscan, 2001.

ROWELL, A. Green backlash: global subversion of the environmental movement. London: Routledge, 1996.

SCHMIDHEINY, S. Changing course: a global business perspective on development and the environment. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1992.

SCHUMACHER, E. F. Small is beautiful: a study of economics as if people mattered. London: Blond and Briggs, 1973.

SEMEL, L. Anthropocene, catastrophism and green political theory. In: HAMILTON, C.; BONNEUIL, C.; GEMENNE, F. (ed.). The Anthropocene and global environmental crisis: rethinking modernity in a new epoch. London: Routledge, 2015. p. 88-99.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743424-1

SKLAIR, Leslie. Capitalism and development in global perspective. In: SKLAIR, Leslie (ed.). Capitalism and development. London: Routledge, 1994.

https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939704000206

SKLAIR, Leslie. The transnational capitalist class. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.

SKLAIR, Leslie. Globalization: capitalism and its alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

SKLAIR, Leslie. Half-baked. Philosophica Critica, v. 2, n. 2, p. 103-116, 2016.

SKLAIR, Leslie. Review article: sleepwalking through the Anthropocene. British Journal of Sociology, London, v. 68, n. 4, p. 775-784, 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12304

SKLAIR, Leslie. The Anthropocene media project: mass media on human impacts on the earth system. Visions of Sustainability, n. 10, 2018.

Available: ojs.unito.it/index.php/visions/article/view/2740/2519.

SKLAIR, Leslie. Globalization and the challenge of the Anthropocene. In: ROSSI, I. (ed.). New frontiers in globalisation research. New York: Springer (forthcoming), 2019.

SKLAIR, L. Terraforming: the Anthropo-scene confronts architecture. In: JONES, P. (ed.). Sociology and Architecture. London: Routledge (forthcoming - 2020).

SKLAIR, L. ed. Neutralizing the Anthropocene. London: Routledge, (forthcoming).

STENGERS, I. Accepting the reality of Gaia: a fundamental shift. In: HAMILTON, C.; BONNEUIL, C.; GEMENNE, F. (ed.). The Anthropocene and global environmental crisis: rethinking modernity in a new epoch. London: Routledge, 2015. p. 134-44.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743424-11

WILLUMS, J. (ed.). The greening of enterprise: business leaders speak out. Bergen: International Chamber of Commerce, 1990.

WULF, A. The invention of nature: the adventures of Alexander von Humboldt, the lost hero of science. London: John Murray, 2016.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2019.2.31970

Direitos autorais 2019 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais

ISSN-L: 1519-6089  -  e-ISSN: 1984-7289

Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais

....................................................................................................................................................................................................

Este periódico é membro do Cope (Committee on Publication Ethics) e adere aos seus princípios. http://www.publicationethics.org


Licença Creative Commons
Exceto onde especificado diferentemente, a matéria publicada neste periódico é licenciada sob forma de uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.

 

Políticas editoriales de revistas científicas brasileñas. Disponibilidad de depósito: Azul .

Copyright: © 2006-2019 Edipucrs