Native-speakerism and English without Borders Program: investigating language ideologies through a language policy

Taisa Pinetti Passoni

Abstract


English without Borders (EwB) is a Brazilian government-sponsored Program created to enhance linguistic proficiency of potential candidates for outward mobility. Assuming that language ideologies embody as well as are embodied by language policies, this paper aims at examining the native-speakerism ideology. It draws on texts comprising instances of enactment and interpretations of EwB in addition to evidences posed by decisions arising from its implementation to examine how native-speakerism is positioned through the Program. Building on critical language policy approach, it employs critical discourse analysis resources to investigate how native-speakerism is challenged or reinforced by the agenda implemented by EwB. Evidences point to the overlapping of deconstructing and corroborating perspectives, especially regarding local interpretations posed by the Language Center coordinators whose considerations about the linguistic diversity of English are marked by ambivalent thoughts on the issue. The coexistence of such tensions indicates the pervasive nature of native-speakerism concerning English in Brazil.


Keywords


English without Borders; language policy; internationalization; English language; language ideologies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abreu-e-Lima, Denise Martins de, Moraes-Filho, Waldenor Barros, & Sarmento, Simone. 2016. O Programa Idiomas sem Fronteiras. In: Do Inglês sem Fronteiras ao Idiomas sem Fronteiras: a construção de uma política linguística para a internacionalização (p. 293-308). Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG.

Altbach, Philip G. 2006. Globalization and the university: Realities in an unequal world. In: International handbook of higher education. Dordrecht: Springer. p. 121-140.

Ajsic, Adnam & McGroarty, Mary. 2015. Mapping language ideologies. In: Research Methods in language policy and planning: a practical guide (p. 181-192). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

Althusser, Louis. 1971. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In: Lenin and Philosophy and other Essays (p. 121-176). New York: Monthly Review Press.

Balán, Jorge. 2014. Research Universities in Latin America: Public Policy and Political Constraints. In: The Forefront of International Higher Education: A festschrift in honor of Philip G. Altbach (p. 159-176). New York: Springer.

Ball, Stephen J. 1994. Education Reform: a critical and post-structural approach. Buckinghan: Open University Press.

Blommaert, J. 2010. The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Blommaert, Jan & Bulcaen, Chris. 2000. Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, p. 447-466.

Fairclough. Norman. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough. Norman. 1995. Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.

Fairclough. Norman. 2003. Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.

Foucault, Michel. 1977. Vigiar e punir. Petrópolis: Vozes.

Freake, Rachelle. 2012. A cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse study of language ideologies in Canadian newspapers. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Corpus Linguistics Conference. Birmingham University. p. 1-11.

Gramsci, Antonio. 1988. Os intelectuais e a organização da cultura. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.

Grin, François. 2006. Economic Considerations in Language Policy In: An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method. Blackwell Publishing: Oxford. p. 77-94.

Halliday, Michael & Matthiessen, Christian. 2004. An introduction to Functional Grammar. 3th edition. Londres: Oxford University Press.

Holliday, Adrian. 2015. Native-speakerism: Taking the Concept Forward and Achieving Cultural Belief. In: (En)Countering Native-speakerism: Global Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 11-25.

Ives, Peter. 2004. Gramsci’s Politics of Language: engaging the Bakhtin Circle & The Frankfurt School. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Jenkins, Jennifer. 2014. English as a lingua franca in the international university. London: Routledge.

Jenkins, Jennifer. 2015. Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca. In: Englishes in Practice, 2(3), p. 49-85.

Johnson, David Cassels. 2015. Intertextuality and Language Policy. In: Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning: A Practical Guide. London: Wiley Blackwell. p. 166-180.

Jordão, Clarissa. 2016. Decolonizing identities: English for internationalization in a Brazilian university. In: Interfaces Brasil/Canadá, 6(3), p. 191-209.

Kachru, Braj. 1989.World Englishes and applied linguistics. In: Studies in the Linguistics Sciences, 19(1), p. 127-52.

Knight, Jane. 2004. Internationalization remodeled: Definitions, rationales, and approaches. In: Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), p. 5-31.

Kristeva, Julia. 1986. Word, dialogue, and novel. In: T. Moi (Ed.). The Kristeva Reader (p. 34-61). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Kumaravadivelu, B. 2012. Individual identity, cultural globalization and teaching English as an international language: The case for an epistemic break. In: Teaching English as an International Language: Principles and Practices (p. 9-27). New York: Routledge.

Macmillan, Katie. 2005. More Than Just Coding? Evaluating CAQDAS in a Discourse Analysis of News Texts. In: Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), p. 1-18 (Art. 25, Sept.).

Pan, Lin. 2015. Deconstructing the ideological discourses of English in language education. London: Springer.

Ricento, Thomas (Ed.). 2000. Ideology, Politics and Language Policies: Focus on English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ricento, Thomas (Ed.). 2006. An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

Richards, Lyn. 1999. Using NVivo in Qualitative Research. Oxford: Sage Publications.

Thompson, John Brookshire. 1984. Studies in theory of ideology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Tollefson, James W. 2006. Critical Theory in Language Policy. In: An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. p. 42-59.

van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

van Dijk, Teun. A. 1993. Elite discourse and racism. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.

Widdowson, Henry. 2000. Object of language and the language subject: On the mediating role of Applied Linguistics. In: Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20. p. 21-33.

Wodak, Ruth. 2001. The discourse-historical approach. In: Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE Publications. p. 63-95.

Woolard, Kathryn Ann. 1998. Introduction: Language Ideology as a Field of Inquiry. In: Language ideologies: practice and theory. Nova York: Oxford University Press. p. 3-62.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2017.1.26842

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt_BR

e-ISSN: 2178-3640

  This journal is a member of, and subscribes to the principles of, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) http://www.publicationethics.org

Licença Creative Commons

Except where otherwise noted, content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Editorial Policies of Brazilian Scientific Journals.* Deposit availability: Blue .

 

 Copyright: © 2006-2017 EDIPUCRS